Abstract
This study starts from the observation that there are relatively few controversial issues in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Given its strong normative background, CSR is rather an atypical discipline, especially in comparison with moral philosophy or applied ethics. Exploring the mainstream CSR agenda, this situation was echoed by widespread consensus on what was considered to be “good practice”: reducing pollution, shutting down sweatshops, discouraging tax evasion, and so on. However, interpretation of these issues through the lens of moral pluralism unveils latent controversies. The moral appraisal of good practices within CSR depends on key moral concepts (such as harm, responsibility, intention, and consequences), which have various—and often incompatible—interpretations. In a nutshell, this article argues that from a moral pluralist standpoint, all CSR topics are potentially controversial.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archard, D. (Ed.). (1996). Philosophy and pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arrington, R. (1982). Advertising and behavioral control. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 3–12.
Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: Free Press.
Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka Uranium Mine. Organization and Environment, 13(1), 3–38.
Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Necrocapitalism. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1541–1563.
Barry, J. (1999). Environment and social theory. London: Routledge.
Bendheim, C. L., Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1998). Determining best practice in corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment analysis: An industry-level study. Business & Society, 37(3), 306–338.
Berlin, I. (1979). Against the current: Essays in the history of ideas. London: Hogarth Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Block, W. (1977). Coase and Demsetz on private property rights. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 1(2), 111–115.
Block, W. (2008). Labor economics from a free-market perspective: Employing the unemployable. Toh Tuck Link, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Boatright, J. R. (2010). Finance ethics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Brown, C. S. (2005). The sustainable enterprise: Profiting from best practice. London: Kogan Page.
Callicott, J. B. (1999). Beyond the land ethic: More essays in environmental philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.
Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(October), 1–44.
Cohen, G. A. (2000). If you are an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cunningham, A. (1999). Responsible advertisers: A contractualist approach to ethical power. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 14(2), 82–94.
Davidson, K. (1996). Selling sin: The marketing of socially unacceptable products. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Den Uyl, D. J. (1984). The new crusaders: The corporate social responsibility debate. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Dunne, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility. In M. Tadajewski (Ed.), Key concepts in critical management studies (pp. 62–66). London: Sage.
Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2009). Green to gold. Chichester: Wiley.
Feinberg, J. (1984). Harm to others. New York: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13.
Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.
Grant, M., & O’Connor, J. (Eds.). (2005). Corporate social responsibility and alcohol: The need and potential for partnership. New York: Routledge.
Griffin, A. (2008). New strategies for reputation management: Gaining control of issues, crises and corporate social responsibility. London: Kogan Page.
Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Hennigfeld, J., Pohl, M., & Tolhurst, N. (Eds.). (2006). The ICCA handbook on corporate social responsibility. Chichester: Wiley.
Heugens, P., van Oosterhout, H., & Kaptein, M. (2006). Foundations and applications for contractualist business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 211–228.
Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues. What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.
Idowu, S. O., & Filho, W. L. (Eds.). (2009). Professionals’ perspectives of corporate social responsibility. London: Springer.
Kekes, J. (1993). The morality of pluralism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kinder, P., Domini, A., & Lydenberg, S. (1993). Investing for good: Making money while being socially responsible. New York: Harper Business.
Kirkpatrick, J. (1986). A philosophic defense of advertising. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 42–48.
Korten, D. (2001). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New York: Wiley.
Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2006). Normative perspectives for ethical and socially responsible marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 154–177.
Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. S. J. (2008). Business and society: Stakeholder relations, ethics and public policy. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Lee, M.-D. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73.
Lindgreen, A., Hingley, M. K., & Vanhamme, J. (Eds.). (2009). The crisis of food brands: Sustaining safe, innovative and competitive food supply. Burlington, VT: Gower.
Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1–7.
Loughran, T., McDonald, B., & Yun, H. (2008). A wolf in sheep’s clothing: The use of ethics-related terms in 10-K reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 39–49.
MacIntyre, A. (1998). A short history of ethics: A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric age to the twentieth century. New York: Routledge.
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Viking Press.
Mankiw, G. N. (2011). Principles of microeconomics. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(June), 268–305.
May, S., Cheney, G., & Roper, J. (2009). The debate over corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCloskey, H. J. (1969). Meta-ethics and normative ethics. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
McGee, R. W. (Ed.). (2012). The ethics of tax evasion. New York: Springer.
Moon, J. (2002). Corporate social responsibility: An overview. In C. Hartley (Ed.), The international directory of corporate philanthropy (pp. 3–14). London: Europa Publications.
Munthe, C. (2011). The price of precaution and the ethics of risks. New York: Springer.
Nader, R., Green, M., & Seligman, J. (1976). Taming the giant corporation. New York: Norton.
OECD. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: Partners for progress. Paris: OECD.
Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.
Passas, N., & Goodwin, N. (Eds.). (2004). It’s legal but it ain’t right. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Philander, G. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of global warming and climate change. London: Sage.
Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Prasad, A. (Ed.). (2003). Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Quinn, W. (1989). Actions, intentions, and consequences: The doctrine of double effect. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 18(4), 334–351.
Rawls, J. (1987). The idea of an overlapping consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1), 1–25.
Reich, R. B. (2008). Supercapitalism: The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. New York: Vintage/Random House.
Reich, R. B. (2010). Aftershock: The next economy and America’s future. New York: Knopf Doubleday.
Renouard, C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 85–97.
Richter, U. H. (2010). Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 625–649.
Ridley-Duff, R. (2007). Communitarian perspectives on social enterprise. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 382–392.
Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross, R. J. S. (2004). Poverty and abuse in the new sweatshops. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Seethaler, S. (2009). Lies, damned lies, and science: How to sort through the noise around global warming, the latest health claims, and other scientific controversies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Sharfman, M. (1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 287–296.
Shaw, W. H. (2009). Marxism, business ethics, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 565–576.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (1988). Moral dilemmas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45–57.
Starr, W. C. (1983). Codes of ethics: Towards a rule-utilitarian justification. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(2), 99–106.
Stone, C. (1975). Where the law ends: The social control of corporate behaviour. New York: Harper & Row.
Thompson, L. J. (2008). Gender equity and corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 87–106.
Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2008). Too good to be true! The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 273–283.
Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., & Tolhurst, N. (Eds.). (2010). The A to Z of corporate social responsibility. Chichester: Wiley.
Vogel, J. (Ed.). (1997). Crapped out: How gambling ruins the economy and destroys lives. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.
Waldron, J. (1988). The right to private property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Weissman, R. (2008). The system implodes: The 10 worst corporations of 2008. Multinational Monitor, 29(3). Retrieved November 10, 2011 from http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2008/112008/weissman.html.
Wellman, C. (1963). The ethical implications of cultural relativity. The Journal of Philosophy, 60(7), 169–184.
Werther, B. W., & Chandler, D. (2010). Strategic social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. London: Sage.
Wong, D. B. (1984). Moral relativity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Woodward, P. A. (Ed.). (2001). The doctrine of double effect: Philosophers debate a controversial moral principle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eabrasu, M. A Moral Pluralist Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: From Good to Controversial Practices. J Bus Ethics 110, 429–439 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1491-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1491-3