Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 115, Issue 3, pp 531–553 | Cite as

The Bright and Dark Sides of Religiosity Among University Students: Do Gender, College Major, and Income Matter?

Article

Abstract

We develop a theoretical model involving religiosity [intrinsic (I), extrinsic-social (Es), and extrinsic-personal (Ep), Time 1], Machiavellianism (Time 2), and propensity to engage in unethical behavior (Time 2) to investigate direct and indirect paths. We collected two-wave panel data from 359 students who had some work experiences. For the whole sample, intrinsic religiosity (I) indirectly curbed unethical intentions through the absence of Machiavellianism, the bright side of religiosity. Both extrinsic-social (Es) and extrinsic-personal (Ep) directly, while extrinsic-social (Es) indirectly, exacerbated unethical intentions, the dark side of religiosity. Multiple-group analyses across gender, college major, and income showed that the bright side existed directly for low-income students, but indirectly for males and females, business majors, and low-income students. Our novel finding showed that Ep undermined unethical intentions indirectly for females. For the dark side, Es incited unethical intentions directly for males, business students, and low-income individuals, but indirectly for females, psychology majors, and low-income people. The Machiavellianism–unethical intentions relationship was the strongest for high-income participants. Religiosity had the highest number of significant paths for low-income individuals and the strongest dark side for males and high-income students, but the highest bright outcome for females. Our novel, original findings foster theory development and testing, add new vocabulary to the conversation of religiosity and unethical intentions, and improve practice.

Keywords

Religiosity Religious Orientation Scale Machiavellianism Unethical intentions Theft Corruption Deception Gender Major Income ASPIRE 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.Google Scholar
  3. Angelidis, J., & Ibrahim, N. (2004). An exploratory study of the impact of degree of religiousness upon an individual’s corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 119–128.Google Scholar
  4. Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V. K. G., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141.Google Scholar
  5. Ariely, D. (2008). How honest people cheat. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 24.Google Scholar
  6. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.Google Scholar
  7. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Treviño, L. K. (2008). Introduction to special topic forum: Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33, 670–684.Google Scholar
  8. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.Google Scholar
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal, 49, 9–15.Google Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.Google Scholar
  12. Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2013). Management: Leading & collaborating in the competitive world (10th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  13. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shephard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.Google Scholar
  14. Beu, D. S., Buckley, M. R., & Harvey, M. G. (2003). Ethical decision-making: A multidimensional construct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  15. Bjarnason, D. (2007). Concept analysis of religiosity. Home Health Care Management and Practice, 19(5), 350–355.Google Scholar
  16. Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 229–243.Google Scholar
  17. Brettfeld, K., & Wetzels, P. (2011). Religious affiliation, religiosity, and juvenile delinquent behavior. Monatsschrift fur Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 94(6), 409–430.Google Scholar
  18. Burton, E. J. (2004, November 11). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  19. Chen, Y. J., & Tang, T. L. P. (2006). Attitude toward and propensity to engage in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across major among university students. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
  20. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cochran, J. K., Wood, P. B., & Arneklev, B. J. (1994). Is the religiosity-delinquency relationship spurious? A test of arousal and social-control theories. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(1), 92–132.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1,500 articles published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 1–73.Google Scholar
  24. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.Google Scholar
  25. Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281–1303.Google Scholar
  26. Conroy, S. J., & Emerson, T. L. N. (2004). Business ethics and religion: Religiosity as a predictor of ethical awareness among students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 383–396.Google Scholar
  27. Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Hoegl, M. (2004). Cross-national differences in managers’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors: A test of institutional anomie theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 411–421.Google Scholar
  28. Culliton, J. W. (1949). Business and religion. Harvard Business Review, 27(3), 265–271.Google Scholar
  29. De Jonge, J., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2009). Convergence of self-reports and coworker reports of counterproductive work behavior: A cross-sectional multi-source survey among health care workers. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 699–707.Google Scholar
  30. Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 35–47.Google Scholar
  31. Deshpande, S. P. (1997). Manager’s perception of proper ethical conduct: The effect of sex, age, and level of education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 79–85.Google Scholar
  32. Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 622–635.Google Scholar
  33. Du, L. Z., Tang, T. L. P., & Yang, D. T. (2007). Money profile and unethical behavior: A study of full-time employees and university students in China. In L. A. Parrish (Ed.), Business ethics in focus (Chapter 7, pp. 135–148). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Egbert, N., Mickley, J., & Coeling, H. (2004). A review and application of social scientific measures of religiosity and spirituality: Assessing a missing component in health communication research. Health Communication, 16(1), 2–27.Google Scholar
  35. Evans, J. M., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2006). Who’s in the ethics driver’s seat? Factors influencing ethics in the MBA curriculum. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 278–293.Google Scholar
  36. Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Dunaway, R. G., & Burton, V. S. (1995). Religion and crime reexamined: The impact of religion, secular controls, and social ecology an adult criminality. Criminology, 33(2), 195–224.Google Scholar
  37. Feiner, M. (2004). The Feiner points of leadership. New York: Warner Business Books.Google Scholar
  38. Flere, S., Edwards, K. J., & Klanjsek, R. (2008). Religious orientation in three central European environments: Quest, intrinsic, and extrinsic dimensions. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  39. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130.Google Scholar
  40. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., & Bruursema, K. (2007). Does your coworker know what you’re doing? Convergence of self- and peer-reports of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(1), 41–60.Google Scholar
  41. Francis, L. J., & Hills, P. R. (2008). The development of the Meaning in Life Index (MILI) and its relationship with personality and religious behaviours and beliefs among UK undergraduate students. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 11(2), 211–220.Google Scholar
  42. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.Google Scholar
  43. Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727.Google Scholar
  44. Geyer, A. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2005). Religion, morality, and self-control. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), The handbook of religion and spirituality (pp. 412–432). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Gibbons, D. (2007). Faiths & religions of the world. The history, culture, and practice of beliefs. San Diego, CA: Thunder Bay Press.Google Scholar
  46. Gilbert, J. A., & Tang, T. L. P. (1998). An examination of organizational trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 321–338.Google Scholar
  47. Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 142–155.Google Scholar
  48. Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2010). Robin Hood under the hood: Wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organization Science, 21(6), 1176–1194.Google Scholar
  49. Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 985–1003.Google Scholar
  50. Greenleaf, R. (1970). The servant as leader. Newton Center, MA: Robert K. Greenleaf Center.Google Scholar
  51. Heney, D. (2012, April 16). Pastor of St. Paschal Baylon Catholic Church, Thousand Oaks, CA. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  52. Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hoffman, J. J. (1998). Are women really more ethical than men? Maybe it depends on the situation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(1), 60–73.Google Scholar
  54. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. M. (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revision. In N. C. Smith & J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in marketing (pp. 775–784). Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  55. James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  56. Jones, G. E., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1996). An experimental examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 511–523.Google Scholar
  57. Kercheval, N. (2004, May 21). Full-time MBA students required to visit federal prisons and interview white-collar criminals (p. 1). Baltimore, MD: The Daily Record.Google Scholar
  58. Kerley, K. R., Copes, H., Tewksbury, R., & Dabney, D. A. (2011). Examining the relationship between religiosity and self-control as predictors of prison deviance. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(8), 1251–1271.Google Scholar
  59. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.Google Scholar
  60. Kotter, J. P. (2008). A sense of urgency. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kriger, M., & Seng, Y. (2005). Leadership with inner meaning: A contingency theory of leadership based on the worldviews of five religions. Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 771–806.Google Scholar
  62. Lam, K. C., & Hung, B. W. S. (2005). Ethics, income and religion. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 199–214.Google Scholar
  63. Latham, G. P., Stajkovic, A. D., & Locke, E. A. (2010). The relevance and viability of subconscious goals in the workplace. Journal of Management, 36(1), 234–255.Google Scholar
  64. Laufer, A., & Solomon, Z. (2011). The role of religious orientations in youth’s posttraumatic symptoms after exposure to terror. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(3), 687–699.Google Scholar
  65. Lavric, M., & Flere, S. (2008). The role of culture in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being. Journal of Religion and Health, 47(2), 164–175.Google Scholar
  66. Leavitt, H. J. (1989). Educating our MBAs: On teaching what we haven’t taught. California Management Review, 31(3), 38–50.Google Scholar
  67. Litzky, B. E., Eddleston, K. A., & Kidder, D. L. (2006). The good, the bad, and the misguided: How managers inadvertently encourage deviant behaviors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 91–103.Google Scholar
  68. Liu, B. C., & Tang, T. L. P. (2011). Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718–727.Google Scholar
  69. Machiavelli, N. (1966). The prince. New York: Bantam. (Original work published 1513).Google Scholar
  70. Malinowski, C., & Berger, K. A. (1996). Undergraduate student attitudes about hypothetical marketing dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 525–535.Google Scholar
  71. Maltby, J. (2002). The Age Universal I-E Scale-12 and orientation toward religion: Confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 136(5), 555–560.Google Scholar
  72. Maltby, J., Lewis, C. A., & Day, L. (1999). Religious orientation and psychological well-being: The role of the frequency of personal prayer. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 363–378.Google Scholar
  73. Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Decide to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1401–1422.Google Scholar
  74. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 294–305.Google Scholar
  75. McDaniel, S. W., & Burnett, J. J. (1990). Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluative criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 101–112.Google Scholar
  76. Merritt, J. (2002, October 21). The best B-schools. Business Week, pp. 85–100.Google Scholar
  77. Merritt, J. (2004, October 18). Welcome to ethics 101. Business Week, p. 90.Google Scholar
  78. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  79. Milton, C. L. (2009). Transparency in nursing leadership: A chosen ethic. Nursing Science Quarterly, 22(1), 23–26.Google Scholar
  80. Mintzberg, H., & Gosling, J. (2002). Educating managers beyond borders. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 64–76.Google Scholar
  81. Murphy, K. R. (1993). Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Groves, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  82. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2009). Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 405–420.Google Scholar
  83. Patwardhan, A. M., Keith, M. E., & Vitell, S. J. (2012). Religiosity, attitude toward business, and ethical beliefs: Hispanic consumers in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1147-8.
  84. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 78–95.Google Scholar
  85. Piffa, P. K., Stancatoa, D. M., Côtéb, S., Mendoza-Dentona, R., & Keltnera, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of the United States of America (PNAS), 109(11), 4086–4091.Google Scholar
  86. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.Google Scholar
  87. Randolph-Seng, B., & Nielsen, M. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303–315.Google Scholar
  88. Rayburn, J. M., & Rayburn, L. G. (1996). Relationship between Machiavellianism and Type A personality and ethical-orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1209–1219.Google Scholar
  89. Rettinger, D. A., & Jordan, A. E. (2005). The relations among religion, motivation, and college cheating: A natural experiment. Ethics and Behavior, 15(2), 107–129.Google Scholar
  90. Richards, C. H., Gilbert, J., & Harris, J. R. (2002). Assessing ethics education needs in the MBA program. Teaching Business Ethics, 6(4), 447–476.Google Scholar
  91. Ritter, B. A. (2006). Can business ethics be trained? A study of the ethical decision-making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 153–164.Google Scholar
  92. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.Google Scholar
  93. Ryckman, R. M., Van Den Borne, B., Thornton, B., & Gold, J. A. (2004). Intrinsic–extrinsic religiosity and university students’ willingness to donate organs posthumously. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 196–205.Google Scholar
  94. Rynes, S. L., Trank, C. Q., Lawson, A. M., & Ilies, R. (2003). Behavioral coursework in business education: Growing evidence of a legitimacy crisis. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3), 269–283.Google Scholar
  95. Sappenfield, M. (2012, June 17). Pastor of St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church, Murfreesboro, TN.Google Scholar
  96. Sardžoska, E., & Tang, T. L. P. (2009). Testing a model of behavioral intentions in the Republic of Macedonia: Differences between the private and the public sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 495–517.Google Scholar
  97. Sardžoska, E., & Tang, T. L. P. (2012). Work-related behavioral intentions in Macedonia: Coping strategies, work environment, love of money, job satisfaction, and demographic variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 373–391.Google Scholar
  98. Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
  99. Schneider, M., & Prasso, S. (2002, April 1). How an MBA can bend your mind. Business Week, p. 12.Google Scholar
  100. Schoorman, F. D., & Mayer, R. C. (2008). The value of common perspectives in self-reported appraisals: You get what you ask for. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 148–159.Google Scholar
  101. Sedikides, C. (2010). Why does religiosity persist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
  102. Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relations between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 17–36.Google Scholar
  103. Simons, T. (2002). The high cost of lost trust. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 18.Google Scholar
  104. Simons, T., Friedman, R., Liu, L. A., & Parks, J. M. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among black and non-black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 650–665.Google Scholar
  105. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  106. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Lee, D. J., Nisius, A. M., & Yu, G. B. (2012). The influence of love of money and religiosity on ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1334-2.
  107. Skinner, B. F. (1972). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  108. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232.Google Scholar
  109. Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 56–77.Google Scholar
  110. Tang, T. L. P. (2007). Income and quality of life: Does the love of money make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 375–393.Google Scholar
  111. Tang, T. L. P. (2010). Money, the meaning of money, management, spirituality, and religion. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 7(2), 173–189.Google Scholar
  112. Tang, T. L. P. (2012). Detecting honest people’s lies in handwriting: The power of the Ten Commandments and internalized ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 389–400.Google Scholar
  113. Tang, T. L. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Effects of personal values, perceived surveillance, and task labels on task preference: The ideology of turning play into work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 99–105.Google Scholar
  114. Tang, T. L. P., & Chen, Y. J. (2008). Intelligence vs. wisdom: The love of money, Machiavellianism, and unethical behavior across college major and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  115. Tang, T. L. P., & Chiu, R. K. (2003). Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: Is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong employees? Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 13–30.Google Scholar
  116. Tang, T. L. P., Cunningham, P. H., Frauman, E., Ivy, M., & Perry, T. L. (2012). Attitudes and occupational commitment among public personnel: Differences between baby boomers and Gen-Xers. Public Personnel Management, 41(2), 327–360.Google Scholar
  117. Tang, T. L. P., & Liu, H. (2012). Love of money and unethical behavior intention: Does an authentic supervisor’s personal integrity and character (ASPIRE) make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 295–312.Google Scholar
  118. Tang, T. L. P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 61(3), 25–31.Google Scholar
  119. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Akande, A., Allen, M. W., Alzubaidi, A. S., Ansari, M. A., et al. (2006). The love of money and pay level satisfaction: Measurement and functional equivalence in 29 geopolitical entities around the world. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 423–452.Google Scholar
  120. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicai, F., Garber, I., Vlerick, P., Liang, J., Akande, A., Allen, M. W., Alzubaidi, A. S., Borg, M. G., Charles-Pauvers, B., Cheng, B. S., Chiu, R. K., Codoban, I., Du, L. Z., Garcia de la Torre, C., Higgs, R. C., Jen, C. K., Kazem, A. M., Kim, K., Luna-Arocas, R., Malovics, E., Moreira, A., Nnedum, A. U. O., Osagie, J. E., Özbek, M. F., Osman-Gani, A., Pereira, F. C., Pholsward, R., Pitariu, H. D., Polic, M., Sardzoska, E., Stembridge, A. F., Tang, T. L. N., Tombolani, M., Trontelj, M., Urbain, C., Canova, L., & Manganelli, A. M. (2011). The love of money is the root of all evil: Pay satisfaction and CPI as moderators. In L. A. Toombs (Ed.), Best paper proceedings of the 2011 annual meeting of the academy of management. Published online at the web site of Academy of management: http://program.aomonline.org/2011/pdf/AOM_2011_Annual_Meeting_Program.pdf.
  121. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Davis, G. M. T., Dolinski, D., Ibrahim, A. H. S., & Wagner, S. L. (2008). To help or not to help? The Good Samaritan effect and the love of money on helping behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 865–887.Google Scholar
  122. Tang, T. L. P., & Talpade, M. (1999). Sex differences in satisfaction with pay and co-workers: Faculty and staff at a public institution of higher education. Public Personnel Management, 28(3), 345–349.Google Scholar
  123. Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, T. L. N. (2010). Finding the lost sheep: A panel study of business students’ intrinsic religiosity, Machiavellianism, and unethical behavior intention in a public institution. Ethics and Behavior, 20(5), 352–379.Google Scholar
  124. The Daily Record. (2003, April 5). Commentary: Education, ethics, and sentences for Enronizing financial reports. Baltimore, MD, p. 1.Google Scholar
  125. Tiliopoulos, N., Bikker, A. P., Coxon, A. P. M., & Hawkin, P. K. (2007). The means and ends of religiosity: A fresh look at Gordon Allport’s religious orientation dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(8), 1609–1620.Google Scholar
  126. Tracey, P. (2012). Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1–48.Google Scholar
  127. Traiser, S., & Eighmy, M. A. (2011). Moral development and narcissism of private and public university business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 325–334.Google Scholar
  128. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  129. Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.Google Scholar
  130. Trimble, D. E. (1997). The religious orientation scale: Review and meta-analysis of social desirability effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 970–986.Google Scholar
  131. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.Google Scholar
  132. Vitell, S. J. (2009). The role of religiosity in business and consumer ethics: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 155–167.Google Scholar
  133. Vitell, S. J., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2009). Religiosity and moral identity: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 601–613.Google Scholar
  134. Vitell, S. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2003). Consumer ethics: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 151–162.Google Scholar
  135. Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 175–181.Google Scholar
  136. Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2006). The role of money and religiosity in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 117–124.Google Scholar
  137. Vitell, S. J., Singh, J. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2007). Consumers’ ethical beliefs: The roles of money, religiosity and attitude toward business. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 369–379.Google Scholar
  138. Watson, P. J., Morris, R. J., & Hood, R. W. (1989). Sin and self-functioning: Antireligious humanistic values, individualism, and the community. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17(2), 157–172.Google Scholar
  139. Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.Google Scholar
  140. Webster, R. L., & Harmon, H. A. (2002). Comparing levels of Machiavellianism of today’s college students with college students of the 1960s. Teaching Business Ethics, 8(4), 435–445.Google Scholar
  141. Wong, H. M. (2008). Religiousness, love of money, and ethical attitudes of Malaysian evangelical Christians in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 169–191.Google Scholar
  142. Wright, T. A., & Goodstein, J. (2007). Character is not “dead” in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33(6), 928–958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rinker School of BusinessPalm Beach Atlantic UniversityWest Palm BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management and Marketing, Jennings A. Jones College of BusinessMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations