Abstract
This study supports the idea that fields form around issues, and describes the roles of various stakeholders in the structuring, shaping, and legitimating of the emerging field of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). A model of the institutional history of the CSR field is outlined, of which a key stage is the appearance of CSR rating agencies as the significant players and Institutional Entrepreneurs of the field. We show to which extent the creation and further development of CSR rating agencies, and the activism of other significant stakeholders of the field (typically portrayed as “standard setters” and “regulatory agents”), contribute to the institutionalization of CSR. With this in mind, among various stakeholders that legitimate the field of CSR, we present the efforts of global and local stakeholders such as the European Union, the United Nations, the International Organization for Standardization, and governments and their interactions. We suggest that the different paths of CSR development and institutionalization in France and in the United States depend on the nature of local and global stakeholders’ involvement in this process and their interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Generally, CSR rating agencies offer two types of ranking services: investor-solicited and company-solicited notations which address, respectively, investors (fund managers and financial companies) and rated entities (companies, university/business school, community, etc.).
ISO is a (quasi-autonomous) non-governmental organization that forms a bridge between the public and private sectors. While many of its member institutes are part of the governmental structure of their countries, or are mandated by their government, other members have their roots uniquely in the private sector (having been set up by national partnerships of industry associations).
CREF Choice Account is the world’s largest socially screened fund for individual investors with $7.9 billion in assets and more than 200,000 investors.
Coke dropped from KLD’s Broad Market Social Index | Atlanta Business Chronicle, Tuesday, July 18, 2006.
Exclusion was, most of the time, applied to companies which made over 5 % of their turnover from debatable industries.
References
Antal, A. B., & Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France: A mix of national traditions and international influences. Business and Society, 46(1), 9–32.
Avetisyan, E., & Hockerts, K. (2012). Consolidation of ESG rating industry: Motivations and impacts. Paper accepted to be presented at Annual Academy of Management Conference in Boston, 3–7 August 2012.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946–967.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268–295.
Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 329–342.
Déjean, F., Gond, J. P., & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57(6), 741–764.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
DiMaggio, P. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920–1940. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional–stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
European Commission. (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility.
Evans, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (3rd ed., pp. 501–510). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ferrary, M. (2009). A stakeholder’s perspective of human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 31–43.
Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skills and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 397–405.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Reconciling aspiration with application (pp. 9–23). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205.
Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 196–214.
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives—a stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 448–461.
Goodpaster, K. (1991). Business and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53–74.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–49). London: Sage.
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). The role of professional associations in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36, 5–31.
Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(4), 929–964.
Hardy, C. (1994). Under-organized interorganizational domains: The case of refugee systems. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 30, 278–296.
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–486.
Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(3), 56–67.
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.
Janney, J. J., Dess, G., & Forlani, V. (2009). Glass houses? Market reactions to firms joining the UN global compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 407–423.
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 215–233.
Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25, 161–187.
Leblebici, H., Salanchik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of inter-organizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333–363.
Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 255–266.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 283–297.
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Wither social initiatives by business? Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945.
Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 109–120.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
Mitroff, I.l. (1983). Stakeholders of the organizational mind: Toward a new view of policy making. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mosley, D., Pietri, P. H., & Megginson, L. C. (1996). Management: Leadership in action. NY: Harper Collins.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
Pettigrew, A. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. NY: Harper and Row.
Porter, T. M. (1994). Making things quantitative. In M. Power (Ed.), Accounting and science, natural inquiry and commercial reason (pp. 36–56). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629–652.
Rowley, T. (1998). Does relational context matter? An empirical test of a network theory of stakeholder influences. Paper presented at the annual Academy of Management Meeting, San Diego, CA.
Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143–156.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511.
Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164–183). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1983). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 1–16). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Sharfman, M. P. (1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg and Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 287–296.
Slager, R., Gond, J.-P., & Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 763–790.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). The roaring nineties: A new history of the world’s most prosperous decade. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39.
Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of interorganizational domains. Human Relations, 36, 269–284.
Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87–108.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769.
Welford, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia: 2004 Survey results. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 33–52.
Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.
Wood, D. J., & Jones, E. J. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229–267.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avetisyan, E., Ferrary, M. Dynamics of Stakeholders’ Implications in the Institutionalization of the CSR Field in France and in the United States. J Bus Ethics 115, 115–133 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1386-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1386-3