Enterprise Web Accessibility Levels Amongst the Forbes 250: Where Art Thou O Virtuous Leader?
- 572 Downloads
The research team measured the enterprise web accessibility levels of the Forbes 250 largest enterprises using the fully automatic accessibility evaluation tool Sortsite, and presented the compliance of the evaluated websites to WCAG 1.0, WCAG 2.0 and Section 508 accessibility levels. Given the recent attention to organizational leaders having ethical duties towards their dedicated employees, we propose that ‘societal citizenship behaviour’ concerns ethical duties of organizational leaders towards society in general and in particular to those who have less means to assert their needs. In effect, we found enterprise website accessibility levels to be in need of significant improvement. An interpretation of a positive path forward to better enterprise website accessibility levels is put forth based on a focus-group interaction and using BNML—a novel Business Narrative Modelling Language.
KeywordsWCAG Section 508 Website evaluation Website accessibility levels BNML
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the anonymous reviewers of the Journal of Business Ethics whose help and motivating comments guided us to shape the final manuscript as presented above: a guiding hand which will also, we are sure, lead us to the definition of new research objectives in the quest for website accessibility for all.
- Bjork, S., & Holopainen, J. (2005). Patterns in game design. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media.Google Scholar
- Bradbard, D. A., & Peters, C. (2010). Web accessibility theory and practice: An introduction for university faculty. The Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
- Brewer, J. (2006). Why standards harmonization is essential to web accessibility. Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/harmon.
- Chisholm, W. A., & Henry, S. L. (2005). Interdependent components of web accessibility. In Proceedings of the 2005 international cross-disciplinary workshop on web accessibility—W4A, Chiba, Japan, pp. 31–37.Google Scholar
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Cullen, K., Kubitschke, L., Boussios, T., Dolphin, C., & Meyer, I. (2009, October). Web accessibility in European countries: Level of compliance with latest international accessibility specifications, notably WCAG 2.0, and approaches or plans to implement those specifications. European Commission.Google Scholar
- Drews, W. (2008). A Web 2.0 tourism information system for accessible tourism. In P. O’Conner, W. Hopken, & U. Gretzel (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism, proceedings of the international conference in Innsbruck, Austria (pp. 164–174). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
- EU. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). European Commission, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- EU. (2006). i2010 eGovernment Action Plan: Accelerating eGovernment in Europe for the benefit of all. Retrieved August 15, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=25286.
- EU. (2010). Council conclusions on Digital Agenda for Europe. In 3017th transport, telecommunications and energy council meeting, Brussels, 31 May, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
- Figueira, M. M. (2010). Outliers identification. Polytechnic Institute of Viseu. Retrieved August 17, 2010 from http://www.ipv.pt/millenium/arq12.htm.
- Forbes.com. (2011). The world’s leading companies. Retrieved March 15, 2011 from http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/18/global-09_The-Global-2000_Rank.html.
- Gonçalves, R., Martins, J., Pereira, J., Oliveira, M. A., & Ferreira, J. J. P. (2011). Accessibility levels of Portuguese enterprise websites: Equal opportunities for all? Behaviour & Information Technology. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.563802.
- Gonçalves, R., & Oliveira, M. A. (2010). Interacting with technology in an ever more complex world. In C. Wagner (Ed.), Strategies and technologies for a sustainable future (pp. 257–268). Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.Google Scholar
- Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. New York, USA: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
- Grubbs, F. E. (1969). Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics, American Statistical Association and American Society for Quality, 11(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
- ISO. (1997). ISO 9241: Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminal (VDT), parts 1–17.Google Scholar
- ISO. (2002). ISO TS 16071—ergonomics of human system interaction—Guidance on accessibility for human-computer interfaces.Google Scholar
- ISO. (2006). ISO 9241-110—ergonomics of human system interaction—part 110—dialogue principles. Berlin: Beuth.Google Scholar
- ISO. (2008). ISO 9241-171—ergonomics of human-system interaction—guidance on software accessibility.Google Scholar
- ITAW. (2010). Section 508 laws. Retrieved December 20, 2010 from http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?fuseAction=Laws.
- Kurniawan, S. H., Ellis, R. D., & Zaphiris, P. (2001). Usability and accessibility comparison of governmental, organizational, educational and commercial aging/health-related websites. WebNet Journal: Internet Technologies, Applications & Issues, 3(3), 45–52.Google Scholar
- Lazar, J., Beavan, P., Brown, J., Coffey, D., Nolf, B., Poole, R., et al. (2010). Investigating the accessibility of state government web sites in Maryland. In P. Langdon, J. Clarkson, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Designing inclusive interactions, proceedings of the 2010 Cambridge workshop on universal access and assistive technology (pp. 69–78). London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lee, H.-W. (2010). Maximizing knowledge preservation and transformation in organization. African Journal of Business Management, 4(17), 3769–3774.Google Scholar
- Lew, P., Olsina, L., & Becker, P. (2011). An integrated strategy to systematically understand and manage quality in use for web applications. Requirements Engineering, 1–32. doi: 10.1007/s00766-011-0128-x.
- Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- McGee-Cooper, A., & Trammell, D. (2010). Servant leadership learning communities®: Incubators for great places to work. In D. van Dierendonck & K. Patterson (Eds.), Servant leadership—developments in theory and research (pp. 130–144). Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Mendenhall, W., & Sincich, T. L. (2007). Statistics for engineering and the sciences (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Mertins, K., Ruggaber, R., Popplewell, K., & Xu, X. (2008). Preface to enterprise interoperability III—new challenges and industrial approaches (pp. 5–6). London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Oliveira, M. A., & Ferreira, J. J. P. (2011). Facilitating qualitative research in business studies—using the business narrative to model value creation. African Journal of Business Management, 5(1), 68–75.Google Scholar
- Pernice, K., & Nielsen, J. (2001). Beyond ALT text: Making the web easy to use for users with disabilities. California, USA: Nielsen Norman Group.Google Scholar
- Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sortsite. (2010). Web site testing tool. Retrieved February 8, 2010 from http://www.powermapper.com/products/sortsite/index.htm.
- Spears, L. C. (2010). Servant leadership and Robert K. Greenleaf’s legacy. In D. van Dierendonck & K. Patterson (Eds.), Servant leadership—developments in theory and research (pp. 11–24). Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Thatcher, J., Kirkpatrick, A., Urban, M., Lawson, B., Henry, S., Burks, M., et al. (2006). Web accessibility: Web standards and regulatory compliance. New York: Friends of ED.Google Scholar
- Trewin, S., Cragun, B., Swart, C., Brezin, J., & Richards, J. (2010). Accessibility challenges and tool features: An IBM web developer perspective. In Proceedings of the 2010 international cross disciplinary conference on web accessibility (W4A) (pp. 1–10). Raleigh, NC: ACM.Google Scholar
- Trompenaars, F., & Voerman, E. (2009). Servant-leadership across cultures—harnessing the strength of the world’s most powerful leadership philosophy. Oxford, UK: Infinite Ideas Limited.Google Scholar
- UN. (2006). Global audit of web accessibility. Retrieved March 14, 2012 from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/gawanomensa.htm.
- USAB. (2010). United States Access Board—update of the 508 standards and the telecommunications act guidelines. Retrieved April 28, 2011 from http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/update-index.htm.
- W3C. (2005). Social factors in developing a web accessibility business case for your organization. Retrieved April 3, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/soc.
- W3C. (2006). Conformance evaluation of web sites for accessibility. Retrieved March 25, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/conformance.html.
- W3C. (2008a). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Retrieved March 14, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.
- W3C. (2008b). WAI mission and organization. Retrieved January 18, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/about.html.
- WHO. (2006). Disability and Rehabilitation: WHO action-plan 2006–2011.Google Scholar
- Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case study research—theory, methods, practice. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar