Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Institutionalizing Ethical Innovation in Organizations: An Integrated Causal Model of Moral Innovation Decision Processes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 July 2012

Abstract

This article answers several calls—coming as well from corporate governance practitioners as from corporate governance researchers—concerning the possibility of complying simultaneously with requirements of innovation and ethics. Revealing the long-term orientation as the variable which permits us to link the principal goal of organization, being “survival,” with innovation and ethic, the article devises a framework for incorporating ethics into a company’s processes and strategies for innovation. With the principal goal of organizations being “survival” in the long-term, it is assumed that innovation is necessary in order to realize a going concern. Firms that do not innovate and adapt to rapidly changing business environments are less likely to be sustainable. Thus, it is in a business’ best interests to adopt an innovation process for long-term success. We posit that there are two simultaneous sources of innovation and change that are unavoidable and embedded in the corporate landscape. First, we argue for genetically embedded, Darwinian explanations for adaptations that enable an entity’s survival. This view is combined with more conventional, social science explanations for change. Our new, comprehensive model of the governance of innovation processes hinges on the one hand on an organization’s long-term orientation, which we argue, is not possible without a consideration of an ethical dimension. On the other hand, the model employs, for the first time, the concept of duality, in order to make the positive coexistence of innovation and ethic analytically visible. Guided by this concept the roots of the ethic within innovation are traced from both natural science forces for change, and cultural pressures operating on members of an organization. We present our Integrated Causal Model of Innovation and propose theoretical relationships that will generate numerous avenues for future research in the field, and help managers to reorient their governance strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, W. J. (1978). The productivity dilemma. Baltimore: J. Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S., Tashchian, A., & Shore, T. H. (2001). Codes of ethics as signals for ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 29, 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview.

  • Aristotle (2006). Metaphysics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Stilwell, KS: Digireads.

  • Baucus, M. S., Norton, W. I., Jr., Baucus, D. A., & Human, S. E. (2008). Fostering creativity and innovation without encouraging unethical behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, John Douglas. (2008). For-profit corporations in a just society: A social contract argument concerning the rights and responsibilities of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly.

  • Blasco, M., & Zolner, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Mexico and France: Exploring the role of normative institutions. Business and Society, 49(2), 216–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomer, A., Jagoda, K., & Landry, J. (2010). Canadian oil sands: How innovation and advanced technologies can support sustainable development. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, S. E. (1990). Experience effects in auditing: The role of task-specific knowledge. The Accounting Review, 65(January), 72–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, M. (1949). Natural philosophy of cause and chance. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brans, J.-P., & Gallo, G. (2007). Ethics in OR/MS: Past, present and future. Annals of Operations Research, 153, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy (2nd ed.). Oslo, Norway: Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., & Hansen, M. (2010). Trustworthiness, governance, and wealth creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., & Perrewe, P. L. (1995). Institutionalization of organizational ethics through transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 829–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1995). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. In B. Carlsson (Ed.), Technological systems and economic performance: The case of factory automation (pp. 21–56). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Chambers, R. (1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation. London: John Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champoux, J. E. (2011). Organizational behaviour: Integrating individuals, groups and organizations (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17(2), B37–B53. Application Series, Educational Issues in the Management Sciences and Operational Research (Oct.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (1998). The stakeholder corporation: A business philosophy for the information age. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 182–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (2007). The evolution of directors duties: bridging the divide between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Journal of General Management, 32(3), 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 1, 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2004). Social exchange: The evolutionary design of a neurocognitive system. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (Vol. III). New York: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, P., & Highfield, C. (1990). The arrow of time. New York: Fawcett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species (1958 edition). New York: New American Library.

  • Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting!, towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1987). The blind watchmaker. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R., Fort, T. L., Frederick, W. C., & Hauserman, N. R. (1999). Nature’s place in legal and ethical reasoning: An interactive commentary. American Business Law Journal, 36(4), 633–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, M. J., Gerde, V. W., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2011). Socially responsible modeling: A stakeholder approach to the implementation of ethical modeling in operations research. OR Spectrum, 33, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893/1967). De la division du travail social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (PUF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1991). The society of individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y. (2000). Innovation and ethics: Ethical considerations in the innovation business. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics (Chap. 42, Sect. 42.3). The Addison-Wisely Publishing.

  • Fisher, C. D. (1986). Organizational socialization: An integrative review. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 4, 101–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. (1995). Values, nature, and culture in the American Corporation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. (2004). The evolutionary firm and its moral (dis)contents. In R. E. Freeman & P. H. Werhane (Eds.), Business, science, and ethics. The Ruffin lecture series 4 (pp. 145–176). Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.

  • Frederick, W. C., & Weber, J. (1987). The values of corporate managers and their critics: An empirical description and normative implications. In W. C. Frederick & L. Preston (Eds.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (pp. 131–152). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusari, A. (2004). A reconsideration on the method of economic and social sciences: Procedure, rules, classifications. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(5/6), 501–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D. J. (1979). Evolutionary Biology. New York: Sinauer Associates.

  • Gallo, G. (2004). Operations research and ethics: Responsibility, sharing and cooperation. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor, G. H. (2002). Innovation by design: What it takes to keep your company on the cutting edge. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M. C. (2010). Giving voice to values: How to speak your mind when you know what’s right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, J., Rönnberg Sjödin, D., & Frishammar, J. (2010). Open innovation and the stage-gate process: A revised model for new product development. California Management Review, 52, 106–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, P. (2009). Primal management. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G., & Rousseau, D. (2009). Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: It’s already happening! Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 534–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2004). Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 815–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaler, J. (2000). Positioning business ethics in relation to management and political philosophy. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1783). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten Können. Riga, Lithuania: Friedrich Hartknoch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, M., & Wempe, J. (1998). Twelve gordian knots when developing an organizational code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(8), 853–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. New York: Currency & Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., Mehra, A., & Dunn, M. B. (2011). From blue sky research to problem solving: A philosophy of science theory of new knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, C. W., Slaven, M. P., & Maltz, A. (2005). Improving supply-chain reconfiguration decisions at IBM. Interfaces, 35, 460–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Menestrel, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Ethics outside, within, or beyond OR models? European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1994). Goal setting theory. In H. F. O’Neil & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory, research (pp. 1–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhman, N. (1996). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1944/2001). A scientific theory of culture and other essays. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility from a resource and knowledge perspective. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munir, K. A. (2005). The social construction of events. Organization Studies, 26(1), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M. (2011). Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 409–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1902 [1982]). Di un nuovo errore nello interpretare le teorie dell’economia matematica. Giornale degli Economisti, 12(15), 401–433; reprinted in Busino, G. (Ed.) (1982). Ouvres Complètes 26: Écrites d’économie politique (pp. 488–520). Genéve: Librairie Droz.

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. J. (1970). Economy and society, a study in the integration of economic and social theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, M. (2010). Institutional normativity and the evolution of morals: A behavioural approach to ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petzinger, T. (1999). The new pioneers. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1997). New directions for organization theory problems and prospects. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (2007). What were they thinking: Unconventional wisdom about management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, B. D., & White, R. E. (1999). The evolution of social structure: Why biology matters. Academy of Management Review, 24, 843–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 239–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). Theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1984). Wirtschaftsethik (1st ed.). Gütersloh: Gerhard Mohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, M. (1993). Integrating economics, ecology and thermodynamics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, J. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. G. (1985). Grundprobleme der Entstehung von Selbsthilfeorganizationen in Entwicklungsländern. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1997). Resources, values, and development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1993). Approaches to organisational culture and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. S., & Singer, A. E. (1997). Observer judgments about moral agents’ ethical decisions: The role of justice and moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (1991). The world’s religions. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, S. A. (2005). Maximizing federal natural gas royalties. Interfaces, 35, 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stückelberger, C. (2002). Global trade ethics. Geneva: WCC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Elsbach, K. D., Greenwood, R., Meyer, J. W., & Zilber, T. B. (2010). Organizations and their institutional environments: Bringing meaning, values, and culture back in. Academy of Management Journal, 6, 1234–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 40, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suurs, R. A. A., Hekkert, M. P., Kieboom, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2010). Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development. Energy Policy, 38(1), 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taormina, R. J. (2009). Organizational socialization: The missing link between employee needs and organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(7), 650–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2000). Mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1185–1196). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Barrett, H. C. (2003). The second law of thermodynamics is the first law of psychology: Evolutionary developmental psychology and the theory of tandem, coordinated inheritances: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 858–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, A. (2007). The role of finance and corporate governance in national systems of innovation. Organization Studies, 28(10), 1461–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Barnett, S. (2002). Ethics codes and sales professionals’ perceptions of their organizations’ ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(3), 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. (2005). Business ethics: Concepts and cases. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasieleski, D., & Hayibor, S. (2009). Effects of the use of the availability heuristic on ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behaviour in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., Gerde, V. W., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2008). A blueprint for designing an ethics program in an academic setting. In D. Swanson & D. G. Fisher (Eds.), Advancing business ethics education (pp. 85–101). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 4, 490–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1993). The moral sense. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T., Tsui-Auch, L. S., & McGuire, J. (2007). Corporate governance reform as institutional innovation: The case of Japan. Organization Science, 18(6), 973–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemansky, M. W. (1937). Heat and thermodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CEREFIGE—ICN Business School, Nancy-Metz, 13 Rue Michel Ney, 54000, Nancy, France

    E. Günter Schumacher & David M. Wasieleski

  2. Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, 918 Rockwell Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15282, USA

    David M. Wasieleski

Authors
  1. E. Günter Schumacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Wasieleski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Wasieleski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schumacher, E.G., Wasieleski, D.M. Institutionalizing Ethical Innovation in Organizations: An Integrated Causal Model of Moral Innovation Decision Processes. J Bus Ethics 113, 15–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1277-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1277-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation