Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 101, Supplement 1, pp 33–44 | Cite as

Serving Two Masters: The Contradictory Organization as an Ethical Challenge for Managerial Responsibility

  • Mar PéreztsEmail author
  • Jean-Philippe Bouilloud
  • Vincent de Gaulejac
Article

Abstract

“No one can serve two masters.” This Bible quotation highlights an irreducible contradiction, which echoes numerous organizational settings. This article considers the under-explored ethical implications of paradoxical injunctions created by such a contradiction at the managerial level. Contradictory organizational constraints turn into paradoxant systems, where the organization structurally settles paradoxical injunctions which challenge managerial ethics in practice. We then ask what managerial responsibility means in such contexts and find that managers have then to reshape their practice as a situated construction through constant mediation between different “masters” and bricolage (i.e., tinkering with concepts). An ethnographic case study of an anti-money laundering service in an investment bank illuminates this phenomenon from a practice perspective. The possibility to enact an actual ethical practice within the contradictory organization relies on a new role of the manager. This implies drawing on an approach of responsible management as an enactment of ethics in practice which is situated within the framework of a new conception of both the organization, as a structurally “paradoxant system,” and the manager as a mediator in charge of enacting coherence.

Keywords

Complex organizations Contradictory organizations Ethics-as-practice Managerial ethics Paradoxical injunction Paradoxant system Responsible management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the editors of this Special Issue and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, as well as Lionel Dahan for his help in copy-editing this article.

References

  1. Abrams, F. W. (1951). Management’s responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review, 29(3), 29–34.Google Scholar
  2. Adobor, H. (2006). Exploring the role performance of corporate ethics officers. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 57–75.Google Scholar
  3. Allard-Poesi, F. (2003). Sens Collectif et construction collective du sens. In B. Vidaillet (Ed.), Le Sens de l’Action–Karl Weick: Sociopsychologie de l’organisation. Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, K. (1989). Ethics in practice—Managing the moral corporation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C. (1977). Organizational learning and management information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2(2), 113–123.Google Scholar
  6. Argyris, C. (1986). Reinforcing organizational defensive routines: An unintended human resources activity. Human Resource Management, 25(4), 541–555.Google Scholar
  7. Aristotle. (1953). Metaphysics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 159–178.Google Scholar
  9. Aubert, N. (2003). Le Culte de l’Urgence. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  10. Aubert, N., & Gaulejac, V. de (1991). Le Coût de l’Excellence. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  11. Bakken, T. (2009). Risk, responsibility and conscience. In C. Garsten & T. Hernes (Eds.), Ethical dilemmas in management (pp. 11–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bartunek, J. (1988). The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 137–162). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  13. Bateson, G. (1978). Steps to an ecology of the mind. London: Palladin.Google Scholar
  14. Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251–264.Google Scholar
  15. Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  16. Bevan, D., & Corvellec, H. (2007). The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a Levinasian approach to managerial ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), 208–219.Google Scholar
  17. Bloodgood, J. M., & Chae, B. K. (2010). Organizational paradoxes: Dynamic shifting and integrative management. Management Decision, 48(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
  18. Boholm, A., & Corvellec, H. (2011). A relational theory of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 175–190.Google Scholar
  19. Bouilloud, J. P. (2009). Devenir Sociologue. Toulouse: Erès.Google Scholar
  20. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  21. Brunsson, N. (1985). The irrational organization. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  23. Cassel, C., Johnson, P., & Smith, K. (1997). Opening the black box: Corporate codes of ethics in their organizational context. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(10), 1077–1093.Google Scholar
  24. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18, 107–122.Google Scholar
  25. Corvellec, H. (2010). Organizational risk as it derives from what managers value: A practice-based approach to risk assessment. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18(3), 145–154.Google Scholar
  26. Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. (1984). Towards a model of organizations as interpreting systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–296.Google Scholar
  28. Deslandes, G. (2011). Wittgenstein and the practical turn in business ethics. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 16(1), 48–54.Google Scholar
  29. Edwards, J., & Wolfe, S. (2004). The compliance function in banks. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 12(3), 216–224.Google Scholar
  30. Edwards, J., & Wolfe, S. (2005). Compliance: A review. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 13(1), 48–59.Google Scholar
  31. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  32. Enriquez, E. (1990). L’entreprise comme lien social, un colosse aux pieds d’argile. In R. Sainsaulieu (Ed.), L’entreprise, une affaire de société (pp. 203–228). Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
  33. Enriquez, E. (1997). Les jeux du pouvoir et du désir dans l’entreprise. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
  34. Ethiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. (2004a). Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Science, 50(2), 159–173.Google Scholar
  35. Ethiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. (2004b). Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: an evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 404–437.Google Scholar
  36. Ethiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. (2009). Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organization Science, 20(1), 4–21.Google Scholar
  37. Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.Google Scholar
  38. Favarel-Guarrigues, G., Lascoumes, P., & Godefroy, T. (2009). Les Sentinelles de l’argent sale: les banques aux prises avec l’antiblanchiment. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  39. Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 359–372.Google Scholar
  40. Fowers, B. J. (2003). Reason and human finitude: In praise of practical wisdom. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(4), 415–426.Google Scholar
  41. Garsten, C., & Hernes, T. (Eds.). (2009). Ethical dilemmas in management. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Gaulejac, V. de (2005). La Société Malade de la Gestion. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  43. Gaulejac, V. de (2011). Travail: les Raisons de la Colère. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  44. Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.Google Scholar
  45. Giordano, Y. (2003). Les Paradoxes: une perspective communicationnelle. In V. Perret & E. Josserand (Eds.), Le Paradoxe: penser et gérer autrement les organisations. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  46. Godechot, O. (2001/2005). Les traders: essai de sociologie des marchés financiers. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  47. Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2007). Ethics in practitioner research: An issue of quality. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 199–211.Google Scholar
  48. Handy, C. (1994). The age of paradox. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hartman, E. M. (2008). Reconciliation in business ethics: Some advice from Aristotle. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 253–265.Google Scholar
  50. Hennestad, B. W. (1990). The symbolic impact of double bind leadership: Double bind and the dynamics of organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 27(3), 265–280.Google Scholar
  51. Hernes, T. (2007). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Holt, R. (2006). Principles and practice: Rhetoric and the moral character of managers. Human Relations, 59(12), 91–105.Google Scholar
  53. Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal code, real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Jensen, T., Sandström, J., & Helin, S. (2009). Corporate codes of ethics and bending of moral space. Organization, 16(4), 529–545.Google Scholar
  56. Kant, E. (1785). Fondation de la métaphysique des mœurs. Paris: Fernand Nathan.Google Scholar
  57. Kant, E. (1797). Théorie et Pratique: Sur un prétendu droit de mentir par humanité. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  58. Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (1998). Twelve Gordian knots when developing an organizational code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 853–869.Google Scholar
  59. Kierkegaard, S. (1843/2004). Either/or: A fragment of life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  60. Koehn, D. (1995). A role for virtue ethics in the analysis of business practice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(3), 533–539.Google Scholar
  61. LaFollette, H. (1997). Ethics in practice: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  62. Lemmon, E. J. (1962). Moral dilemmas. In The philosophical review (Vol. 70, pp. 139–158). (Reprinted in Gowans, 1987, pp. 101–114).Google Scholar
  63. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  64. Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.Google Scholar
  65. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.Google Scholar
  66. Luscher, L., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
  67. MacIntryre, A. (1985). After virtue, a study in moral theory (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  68. March, J. G. (1988). Decisions and organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 227–244.Google Scholar
  71. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  72. Mill, J. S. (1861/1979). Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  73. Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of “direct” research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 580–589.Google Scholar
  74. Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 19–32.Google Scholar
  75. Nielsen, R. P. (2010). Practitioner-based theory building in organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 401–406.Google Scholar
  76. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.Google Scholar
  77. Pagès, M., Bonetti, M., de Gaulejac, V., & Descendre, D. (1979/1998). L’emprise de l’organisation. Paris: Desclée De Brouwer.Google Scholar
  78. Perret, V., & Josserand, E. (2003). Le Paradoxe: penser et gérer autrement les organisations. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  79. Perrow, C. (1972/1986). Complex organizations. New York: McGraw Hill-Random House.Google Scholar
  80. Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 3(1), 267–292.Google Scholar
  81. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578.Google Scholar
  82. Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42.Google Scholar
  83. Provis, C. (2010). Virtuous decision making for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 3–16.Google Scholar
  84. Randall, G., & Martin, P. (2003). Developing and using stories or narratives to transmit values and legacy. Organizational Development Journal, 21(3), 44–50.Google Scholar
  85. Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A., & Schwartz, E. (1998). Doing research in business and management. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  86. Reynaud, J.-D. (1989). Les Règles du jeu: L’action collective et la régulation sociale. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  87. Reynaud, J.-D. (1995). Le conflit, la négociation et la règle. Paris: Octares Edition.Google Scholar
  88. Richardson, K. A. (2008). Managing complex organizations: Complexity thinking and the science and art of management. E:CO, 10(2), 13–26.Google Scholar
  89. Riggio, R. E., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The emotional and social intelligences of effective leadership: An emotional and social skill approach. Journal of Management Psychology, 23(2), 169–185.Google Scholar
  90. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  91. Rowland, W. (2005). Greed Inc: Why corporations rule out world and how we let it happen. Toronto: Thomas Allen.Google Scholar
  92. Sartre, J. P. (1946/1996). L’Existentialisme est un humanisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  93. Selart, M., & Johansen, S. (2011). Ethical decision-making in organizations: The role of leadership stress. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 129–143.Google Scholar
  94. Sherry, J. F. (2008). The ethnographer’s apprentice: Trying consumer culture from inside-out. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 85–95.Google Scholar
  95. Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.Google Scholar
  96. Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  97. Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724–736.Google Scholar
  98. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Towards a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
  99. Solomon, R. C. (1999). Business ethics and virtue. In R. E. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics (pp. 30–37). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  100. Solow, D., & Szmerekovsky, J. G. (2006). The role of leadership: What management science can give back to the study of complex systems. E:CO, 8(4), 52–60.Google Scholar
  101. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1022–1040.Google Scholar
  102. Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity, the unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.Google Scholar
  103. Stansbury, J. (2009). Reasoned moral agreement: Applying discourse ethics within organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
  104. Taylor, R. (2002). Virtue ethics: An introduction. New York: Prometheus books.Google Scholar
  105. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  106. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledge—Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Vadera, A. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Brianna, B. C. (2009). Making sense of whistle-blowing’s antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(4), 553–586.Google Scholar
  108. Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.Google Scholar
  109. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  110. Vandekerckhove, W., & Commers, M. S. R. (2004). Whistle blowing and rational loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 225–233.Google Scholar
  111. Vogel, R. (2005). The market for virtue. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  112. Wagner, J. A, I. I. I. (1978). The organizational double-bind: Toward an understanding of rationality and its complement. Academy of Management Review, 3(4), 786–795.Google Scholar
  113. Wansbrough, H. (Ed.). (1985). Bible (the New Jerusalem). Darton: Longman & Todd and Les Editions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  114. Watzlawick, P. (1971). Patterns of psychotic communication. In P. Doucet & C. Laurin (Eds.), Patterns of psychosis. Amsterdam: Exerpta Medica.Google Scholar
  115. Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  116. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  117. Weick, K. E., Obstfeld, D., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.Google Scholar
  118. White, D. W., & Lean, E. (2008). The impact of perceived leader integrity on subordinates in a work team environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 765–778.Google Scholar
  119. Williams, B. (1965). Ethical consistency. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplement), 39, 103–124. (Reprinted in Gowans, 1987, pp. 115–137).Google Scholar
  120. Willmott, H. (1997). Rethinking management and managerial work: Capitalism, control and subjectivity. Human Relations, 50(11), 1329–1351.Google Scholar
  121. Wittezaele, J. J., (dir.) (2008). La Double Contrainte. L’héritage des paradoxes de Bateson en Sciences Humaines. Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  122. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Designs and methods. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mar Pérezts
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-Philippe Bouilloud
    • 2
  • Vincent de Gaulejac
    • 3
  1. 1.ESCP Europe/CNAMParisFrance
  2. 2.ESCP EuropeParisFrance
  3. 3.Université de Paris 7 DiderotParisFrance

Personalised recommendations