Paternalism and the Pokies: Unjustified State Interference or Justifiable Intervention?
- 686 Downloads
The Australian Productivity Commission and a Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform have recommended implementation of a mandatory pre-commitment system for electronic gambling. Organizations associated with the gambling industry have protested that such interventions reduce individual rights, and will cause a reduction in revenue which will cost jobs and reduce gaming venue support for local communities. This article is not concerned with the design details or the evidence base of the proposed scheme, but rather with the fundamental criticism that a mandatory pre-commitment policy is an unacceptable interference with the liberty of the individual, and of organizations. It is argued that the concept of paternalism is a useful lens with which to study the interactions between business and society on this issue. It is contended that the benefits of a pre-commitment system to problem gamblers and society are socially and economically significant, and the cost to recreational gamblers, particularly the cost in terms of interference with the liberty of the individual, is minimal. Pre-commitment also requires gambling businesses to act in a more socially responsible manner. It is concluded that the proposed legislation constitutes a paternalistic intervention by government on the interaction between business and society, and that this is justified.
KeywordsGambling Paternalism Regulation State intervention Government policy Corporate social responsibility
- Banks, G. (2011). Evidence and social policy: The case of gambling. Presentation to South Australian Centre for Economic Studies, Corporate Seminar, 30 March. http://www.pc.gov.au/speeches/evidence-and-social-policy-gambling. Accessed 29 May 2011.
- Blaszcynski, A., & Gainsbury, S. (2011). Submission to the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform Inquiry into Pre-commitment Scheme. http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/gamblingreform_ctte/precommitment_scheme/submissions.htm. Accessed 12 December 2011.
- Dworkin, G. (1971). Paternalism. In R. A. Wasserstrom (Ed.), Morality and the law (pp. 107–126). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Feinberg, J. (1971). Legal paternalism. In Rights, Justice and the Bounds of Liberty: Essays in Social Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Francis, A. (2011). Wilkie Sets Deadline for Pokies Reform Plan, 29 March. ABC Online. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/29/3177087.htm. Accessed 29 May 2011.
- Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 33, 122–125.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Gillard, J., & Wilkie, A. (2010). Agreement, 2 September. http://resources.news.com.au/files/2010/09/02/1225913/448095-hs-news-file-gillard-wilkie-agreement.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2011.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1963). Law, liberty and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., & Mackellar, J. (2004). Challenges in responsible provision of gambling: Questions of efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency. UNLV Gaming Research and Review Journal, 8, 43–58.Google Scholar
- Hobson, P. (1984). Another look at paternalism. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1, 293–304.Google Scholar
- Homer. (2001). The Odyssey (S. H. Butcher & A. Lang, Vol. XXII, Trans.) New York: The Harvard Classics, P.F. Collier & Son, 1909–14; Bartleby.Google Scholar
- Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform. (2011). First report: The design and implementation of a mandatory pre-commitment system for electronic gaming machines, 6 May 2011, Parliament of Australia, Canberra. http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/gamblingreform_ctte/precommitment_scheme/report/report.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2011.
- Kleinig, J. (1983). Paternalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Mill, J. S. [1964(1859, 1861, 1863)]. Utilitarianism, liberty, representative government. London: Everyman.Google Scholar
- Mond, J., Davidson, T., & McAllister, I. (2011). Public opinion poll on gambling: ANU poll, July, Australian National Institute for Public Policy and ANU College of Arts and Sciences. http://lyceum.anu.edu.au/wp-content/blogs/3/uploads//ANUpoll-%20Gambling1.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2011.
- Newell, P. (2011). National Press Club Address, 23 March. http://www.clubsnsw.com.au/Content/NavigationMenu/PolicyIssues/NationalPressClubAddress/default.htm. Accessed 2 June 2011.
- Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries Inquiry Report, Canberra. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/gambling/docs/finalreport. Accessed 6 September 2011.
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, Productivity Committee Enquiry Report, vol. 1, No. 50, Canberra. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/gambling-2009/report. Accessed 29 August 2011.
- Slutske, W. S., Zhu, G., Meier, M. H., & Martin, N. G. (2011). Disordered gambling as defined by the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders and the south oaks gambling screen: Evidence for a common etiologic structure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130, 743–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, A. [1976(1776)]. In R.H. Campbell & A.S. Skinner (Eds.), The Wealth of Nations (IV ii 9). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ten, C. L. (1980). Mill on liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Thomas, M., & Buckmaster, L. (2010). Paternalism in social policy—When is it justifiable? Parliamentary Library Research Paper no. 8, 2010-11, 15 December, (Parliament of Australia). http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/2010-11/11rp08.pdf. Accessed 28 August 2011.
- Watts, N. (2009). Merrylands sporting and bowling submission to the Productivity Commisssion. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/gambling-2009/submissions. Accessed 5 September 2009.