Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 108, Issue 1, pp 61–79 | Cite as

Sustainability Practices and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Top Global Corporations

  • Rashid AmeerEmail author
  • Radiah Othman


Sustainability is concerned with the impact of present actions on the ecosystems, societies, and environments of the future. Such concerns should be reflected in the strategic planning of sustainable corporations. Strategic intentions of this nature are operationalized through the adoption of a long-term focus and a more inclusive set of responsibilities focusing on ethical practices, employees, environment, and customers. A central hypothesis, that we test in this paper is that companies which attend to this set of responsibilities under the term superior sustainable practices, have higher financial performance compared to those that do not engage in such practices. The target population of this study consists of the top 100 sustainable global companies in 2008 which have been selected from a universe of 3,000 firms from the developed countries and emerging markets. We find significant higher mean sales growth, return on assets, profit before taxation, and cash flows from operations in some activity sectors of the sample companies compared to the control companies over the period of 2006–2010. Furthermore, our findings show that the higher financial performance of sustainable companies has increased and been sustained over the sample. Notwithstanding sample limitation, causal evidence reported in this paper suggests that, there is bi-directional relationship between corporate social responsibilities practices and corporate financial performance.


Environment Ethics Diversity Performance Sustainability 



We are thankful to Research Management Institute, University Teknologi Mara for the research grant for this paper.


  1. Acciona. (2008). Acciona Sustainability Report.Google Scholar
  2. Accor. (2008). Accor Annual Report.Google Scholar
  3. Adam, C., & Zutshi, A. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Why business should act responsibly and be accountable. Australian Accounting Review, 14(3), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adidas. (2008). Adidas Sustainable Performance Review.Google Scholar
  5. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Evaluating sustainability: Need for standards. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 2(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
  7. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, M. T. (1990). Working ethics: Strategies for decision making and organizational responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Buchanan, D., Fitzgerald, L., Ketley, D., Gollop, R., Jones, J. L., Lamont, S. S., et al. (2005). No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cacioppe, R., Forster, N., & Fox, M. (2007). A survey of managers’ perceptions of corporate ethics and social responsibility and action that may affect companies’ success. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  13. De Vaus, D. A. (1986). Surveys in social research. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Diageo Plc. (2008). Diageo Corporate Citizenship Report.Google Scholar
  15. Dowling, G. R. (2001). Creating corporate reputations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, M. J. (1996). Improving environmental accounting with full environmental cost accounting. Environmental Quality Management, Autumn, 11–22.Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34, 585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fadul, J., Halliburton, R., & Maurer, R. A. (2004). Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and firm value in the oil and gas industry, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26–29 September, Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrick, W. C. (2006). Corporations, be good! The story of corporate social responsibility. Indianapolis, IN: Dogear Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine 13, September 32–33.Google Scholar
  21. Gelb, D. S., & Strawser, J. A. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosure: An alternative explanation for increased disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(1), 874–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henri, J.-F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting Organization and Society, 35(1), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Intel. (2008). Intel Social Responsibility Report.Google Scholar
  26. Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurucz, E., Colbert, B., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 83–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, D. D., Faff, R. W., & Smith, K. L. (2009). Reviving the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved financial performance? Australian Journal of Management, 34, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopez, V. M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McElhaney, K. A., Toffel, M. W., & Hass, N. (2005). Designing a sustainability management system at BMW group: The Designworks/USA case study. Greener Management International, 46, 103–116.Google Scholar
  31. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14301 and other criteria. Corporate Social and Environmental Management Journal, 9, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
  34. Patten, M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patten, M. (2008). Does the market value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from the response to the 2004 tsunami relief effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). The awakening Giant: Continuity and change in ICI. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). ‘The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business and Society, 36, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rimmer, M., Macneil, J., Chenhall, R., Smith, K., & Watts, L. (1996). Reinventing competitiveness: Achieving best practices in Australia. South Melbourne: Pitman.Google Scholar
  40. Roberts, W. P., & Dowling, R. G. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rondinelli, D. A., & Berry, M. A. (2000). Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations. Social responsibility and sustainable development. European Management Journal, 18(1), 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schaltegger, S., & Synnestvedt, T. (2002). The link between ‘green’ and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 65, 339–346.Google Scholar
  44. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainable performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting. Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3, 1–19.Google Scholar
  45. Scholtens, B. (2008). A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 68, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh, K. R., Murty, H. R., Dikshit, A. K., & Gupta, S. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stone, B. A. (2001). Special-purpose taxonomy of corporate social performance concepts. Accounting and the Public Interest, 1, 42–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sustainability–UNEP. (1997). The 1997 Benchmark Survey: The Third International Progress Report on Company Environmental Reporting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Székely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2009). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23, 628–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tenuta, P. (2010). The measurement of sustainability. Review of Business Research, 10(2), 163–171.Google Scholar
  51. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance—financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wagner, M. (2007). Integration of environmental management with other managerial functions of the firm: Empirical effects on drivers of economic performance. Long Range Planning, 40, 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wagner, M. (2011). Corporate performance implications of extended stakeholder management: New insights on mediation and moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 942–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wagner, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2003). How does sustainability performance relate to and business competitiveness? Greener Management International, 44, 5–16.Google Scholar
  55. Wagner, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2004). The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance. An empirical analysis in EU manufacturing. European Management Journal, 22(5), 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warhurst, A. (2002). Sustainability indicators and sustainability performance management. Report to the Project: Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD), International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Warwick, England.
  57. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.Google Scholar
  58. World Commission on Environment, Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Accounting Research Institute, Faculty of AccountancyUniversiti Teknologi MaraShah Alam SelangorMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Accountancy, College of BusinessMassey University New ZealandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations