Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 107, Issue 4, pp 449–472 | Cite as

The Ethical and Economic Case Against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment



During the last decade, scholarly criticism of sweatshops has grown increasingly sophisticated. This article reviews the new moral and economic foundations of these criticisms and argues that they are flawed. It seeks to advance the debate over sweatshops by noting the extent to which the case for sweatshops does, and does not, depend on the existence of competitive markets. It attempts to more carefully distinguish between different ways in which various parties might seek to modify sweatshop behavior, and to point out that there is more room for consensus regarding some of these methods than has previously been recognized. It addresses the question of when sweatshops are justified in violating local labor laws. And it assesses the relevance of recent literature on coercion and exploitation as it applies to sweatshop labor. It concludes with a list of challenges that critics of sweatshops must meet to productively advance the debate.


Sweatshops Exploitation Coercion Minimum wage Labor law 


  1. Anderson, S. (2006). Coercion. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA. October 1 2010.
  2. Arnold, D. (2003). Philosophical foundations: Moral reasoning, human rights, and global labor practices. In L. Hartman, D. Arnold, & R. E. Wokutch (Eds.), Rising above sweatshops: Innovative approaches to global labor challenges (pp. 77–99). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, D. (2010). Working conditions: Safety and sweatshops. In G. Brenkert & T. Beauchamp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics (pp. 628–653). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2007). Respect for workers in global supply chains: Advancing the debate over sweatshops. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 135–145.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold, D., & Hartman, L. (2003). Moral imagination and the future of sweatshops. Business and Society Review, 108(4), 425–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnold, D., & Hartman, L. (2005). Beyond sweatshops: Positive deviancy and global labour practices. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14.3, 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnold, D., & Hartman, L. (2006). Worker rights and low wage industrialization: How to avoid sweatshops. Human Rights Quarterly, 283, 676–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denis, A. (2001). Coercion and moral responsibility. American Philosophical Quarterly, 38(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, M. (2009). The principle of unconscionability. In Law and economics workshop. Berkeley, UC: Law and Economics Workshop, Berkeley Program in Law and Economics.
  11. Elliot, K., & Freeman, R. (2004). White hats or Don Quixotes? Human rights vigilantes in the global economy. In R. Freeman, J. Hersch, & L. Mishel (Eds.), Emerging labor market institutions for the twenty first century. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Freiman, C., & Nichols, S. (2011). Is desert in the details? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(1), 121–133.Google Scholar
  13. Goodin, R. E. (1987). Exploiting a situation and exploiting a person. In A. Reeve (Ed.), Modern theories of exploitation (pp. 166–200). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Green, L. (2010). Legal obligation and authority. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA. October 1, 2010.
  15. Hall, J., & Leeson, P. (2007). Good for the goose, bad for the gander: International labor standards and comparative development. Journal of Labor Research, 28(4), 658–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison, A., & Scorse, J. (2010). Multinationals and anti-sweatshop activism. American Economic Review, 100(1), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  18. Hayek, F. A. (1968). Competition as a discovery procedure. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), New studies in philosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kristof, N. D. (2009). Where sweatshops are a dream. The New York Times, January 14 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Kristof, N. D., & Wudunn, S. Two cheers for sweatshops. The New York Times, September 24, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. Krugman, P. (1997). In praise of cheap labor. Slate, March 21, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. Maitland, I. (1996). The great non-debate over international sweatshops. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. British Academy of Management annual conference proceedings (6th ed., pp. 593–605). Englewood Cliffs: Pretence Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Mayer, R. (2007a). Sweatshops, exploitation, and moral responsibility. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38(4), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayer, R. (2007b). What’s wrong with exploitation? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(2), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyers, C. (2004). Wrongful beneficence: Exploitation and third world sweatshops. Journal of Social Philosophy, 35(3), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, J. (2003). Why economists are wrong about sweatshops and the antisweatshop movement. Challenge, 46, 93–122.Google Scholar
  27. Morse, S. J. (2000). Uncontrollable urges and irrational people. Virginia Law Review, 88, 1025–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pogge, T. W. (2005). World poverty and human rights. Ethics and International Affairs, 19(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollin, R., Burns, J., & Heintz, J. (2004). Global apparel production and sweatshop labour: Can raising retail prices finance living wages? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell, B. (2006). In reply to sweatshop sophistries. Human Rights Quarterly, 28(4), 1031–1042.Google Scholar
  31. Powell, B. (2010). No sweat: How sweatshops improve lives and economic growth. Boston, MA: Suffolk University. 2010 volume of Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  32. Powell, B., & Clark, J. R. (2010). Guatemala sweatshops: Employee evidence on working conditions. Boston, MA: Suffolk University. 2010 volume of Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  33. Powell, B., & Skarbek, D. (2006). Sweatshops and third world living standards: Are the jobs worth the sweat? Journal of Labor Research, 27(2), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sample, R. (2003). Exploitation: What it is and why it’s wrong. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  35. Silvermint, D. (2011). Oppression and victim agency. Tucson: University of Arizona. 2011 of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  36. Singer, P. (2009). The life you can save: Acting now to end world poverty. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  37. Skarbek, D., Skarbek, E., Skarbek, B., & Skarbek, E. (2011, forthcoming). Sweatshops, opportunity costs, and non-monetary compensation: Evidence from El Salvador. American Journal of Economics and Sociology.Google Scholar
  38. Snyder, J. C. (2008). Needs exploitation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(4), 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snyder, J. C. (2009). Efficiency, equality, and price gouging: A response to Zwolinski. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 303–306.Google Scholar
  40. Snyder, J. C. (2010). Exploitation and sweatshop labor: Perspectives and issues. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 187–213.Google Scholar
  41. Sollars, G. G., & Englander, F. (2007). Sweatshops: Kant and consequences. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 115–133.Google Scholar
  42. Stringham, E. P. (2010). Economic value and costs are subjective. In P. Boettke (Ed.), Handbook on contemporary Austrian economics (pp. 43–66). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Valdman, M. (2008). Exploitation and injustice. Social Theory and Practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(4), 551–572.Google Scholar
  44. Valdman, M. (2009). A theory of wrongful exploitation. Philosophers’ Imprint, 9(6), 1–13.Google Scholar
  45. Varley, P. (1998). The sweatshop quandary: Corporate responsibility on the global frontier. Washington, DC: Investor Responsibility Research Center.Google Scholar
  46. Viscusi, K., Harrington, J., & Vernon, J. (2005). Economics of regulation and antitrust (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  48. Wertheimer, A. (1996). Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Print.Google Scholar
  49. Wertheimer, A. (2008). Exploitation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. January 12, 2010.
  50. Wertheimer, A. (2011). Widening the lens: Philosophical essays on research with human subjects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, W. (2004). Sweatshop exploitation. Fairfax, VA. 10/1 2010.
  52. Wolff, R. P. (1970). In defense of anarchism (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wood, A. W. (1995). Exploitation. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(2), 136–158.Google Scholar
  54. Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23(1), 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimmerman, D. (1981). Coercive wage offers. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(2), 121–145.Google Scholar
  56. Zwolinski, M. (2007). Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 689–727.Google Scholar
  57. Zwolinski, M. (2008). The ethics of price gouging. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(3), 347–378.Google Scholar
  58. Zwolinski, M. (2009). Price gouging, non-worseness, and distributive justice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 295–306.Google Scholar
  59. Zwolinski, M. (2012). Structural exploitation. Social Philosophy and Policy, 29(1).Google Scholar
  60. Zwolinski, M. Exploitation and neglect. San Diego: University of San Diego.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Suffolk UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.University of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations