Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 53–72 | Cite as

The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility

Article

Abstract

In this article, we examine the empirical association between corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement by investigating their causal effects. Employing a large and extensive US sample, we first find that while the lag of CSR does not affect CG variables, the lag of CG variables positively affects firms’ CSR engagement, after controlling for various firm characteristics. In addition, to examine the relative importance of stakeholder theory and agency theory regarding the associations among CSR, CG, and corporate financial performance (CFP), we also examine the relation between CSR and CFP. After correcting for endogeneity bias, our results show that CSR engagement positively influences CFP, supporting the conflict-resolution hypothesis based on stakeholder theory, but not the CSR overinvestment argument based on agency theory. Furthermore, firms’ CSR engagement with the community, environment, diversity, and employees plays a significantly positive role in enhancing CFP.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Corporate governance Corporate financial performance Conflict resolution 

References

  1. Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in CSR: A Multi-level theory of social change in organizations’. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrist, J. (2000). Estimation of limited-dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: simple strategies for empirical practice, NBER#248.Google Scholar
  3. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, D. (2010). Business and its environment (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, D., Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1–46 (Article 1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bebchuk, L., & Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 78, 409–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1043–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values—a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhimani, A., & Soonawalla, K. (2005). From conformance to performance: The corporate responsibilities continuum. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen, H. (1953). Social responsibilities of the business-man. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  12. Bushman, R., Piotroski, J., & Smith, A. (2005). Insider trading restrictions and analysts’ incentives to follow firms. Journal of Finance, 60, 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cadbury, A. (2000). The corporate governance agenda. Journal of Corporate Governance, Practice-Based Papers, 8, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calton, J., & Payne, S. (2003). Coping with paradox. Business and Society, 42, 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, H. (1996). Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 298–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  17. Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 38(3), 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carroll, A. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carroll, A. (2008). The history of corporate social responsibility: concepts and practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 741–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheung, Y., Tan, W., Ahn, H., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility matter in Asian emerging markets? Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chung, K., & Jo, H. (1996). The impact of security analysts’ monitoring and marketing functions on the market value of firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(4), 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  25. Donham, W. (1927). The social significance of business. Harvard Business Review, 4, 406–419.Google Scholar
  26. Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good? Working Paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, R. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman, M. (1970). Money and income: Comment on Tobin. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fuller, J., & Jensen, M. (2002). Just say no to Wall street: Courageous CEOs are putting a stop to the earnings game and we will all be better off for it. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(4), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garcia-Castro, R., Anno, M., & Canela, M. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gatewood, R., & Carroll, A. (1991). Assessment of ethical performance of organization members: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 667–690.Google Scholar
  34. Goel, A., & Thakor, A. (2008). Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2737–2784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2010). Extreme governance: An analysis of dual-class firms in United States. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 1051–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greene, W. (1993). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analyst Journal, 49, 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2008). A theory of board control and size. Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1797–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.Google Scholar
  42. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heckman, J., & Robb, R., Jr. (1985). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions, Chap. 4. In J. Heckman & B. Singer (Eds.), Longitudinal analysis of labor market data. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (1998). ‘Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, 88, 96–118.Google Scholar
  45. Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9, 7–26.Google Scholar
  46. Hill, R. P., Ainscough, T., Shank, T., & Manullang, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 12, 809–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jo, H., & Kim, Y. (2007). Disclosure frequency and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jo, H., & Kim, Y. (2008). Ethics and disclosure: A study of the financial performance of firms in the seasoned equity offerings market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 855–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lim, T. (2001). Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias. Journal of Finance, 56, 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Linck, J., Netter, J., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60, 2661–2700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Millimet, D. (2001). What is the difference between “endogeneity” and “sample selection bias”? Working paper, Southern Methodist University.Google Scholar
  61. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.Google Scholar
  62. Moffitt, R. (1999). New developments in econometric methods for labor market analysis, Chap. 24. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), The handbook of labor economics, Vol. IIIA. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  63. Morck, R., & Yang, F. (2001). The mysterious growing value of the S&P 500 membership. Working Paper, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
  64. Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribo, J. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationships between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Raheja, C. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ricart, J., Rodriguez, M., & Sanchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical investigation of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance, 5, 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scherer, A., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 502–532.Google Scholar
  68. Shin, H., & Stulz, R. (2000). Firm value, risk, and growth opportunities. NBER Working Paper #7808.Google Scholar
  69. Spitzeck, H. (2009). The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance, 9, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whetten, D., Rands, G., & Godfrey, P. (2002). What are the responsibilities of business to society? In A. Pettigrew, A. Thomas & R. Whittingen (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management (pp. 373–408). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance, Leavey School of BusinessSanta Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA
  2. 2.Graziadio School of Business and ManagementPepperdine UniversityMalibuUSA

Personalised recommendations