Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 107, Issue 3, pp 255–264 | Cite as

Authentic Leadership and Behavioral Integrity as Drivers of Follower Commitment and Performance

  • Hannes LeroyEmail author
  • Michael E. Palanski
  • Tony Simons


The literatures on both authentic leadership and behavioral integrity have argued that leader integrity drives follower performance. Yet, despite overlap in conceptualization and mechanisms, no research has investigated how authentic leadership and behavioral integrity relate to one another in driving follower performance. In this study, we propose and test the notion that authentic leadership behavior is an antecedent to perceptions of leader behavioral integrity, which in turn affects follower affective organizational commitment and follower work role performance. Analysis of a survey of 49 teams in the service industry supports the proposition that authentic leadership is related to follower affective organizational commitment, fully mediated through leader behavioral integrity. Next, we found that authentic leadership and leader behavioral integrity are related to follower work role performance, fully mediated through follower affective organizational commitment. These relationships hold when controlling for ethical organizational culture.


Affective organizational commitment Authentic leadership Behavioral integrity Ethical organizational culture Work role performance 


  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behaviour: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership. Theory, research, & managerial applications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, C. D., Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2005). Looking forward but learning from our past: Potential challenges to developing authentic leadership theory and authentic leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 622–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, C., Ferris, G. F., & Perrewé, P. L. (2005). Leader political skill and authentic leadership. In W. L. Gardner, B. J. Avolio, & F. O. Walumbwa (Eds.), Authentic leadership theory and practice: Origins effects and development. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Driscoll, C., & McKee, M. (2007). Restorying a culture of ethical and spiritual values: A role for leader storytelling. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., et al. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31, 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffin, M., Neal, A., & Parker, S. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behaviors in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Leaders, values and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson, K. T. (2005). Towards authenticity: A sartrean perspective on business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 23–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, M. B. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 38, 283–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In M. Williams (Ed.), Handbook of methodological innovation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Liedtka, J. (2007). Strategy making and the search for authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindell, M., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practices in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations—extension and test of a 3-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer, J. P., & Gagné, M. (2008). Employee engagement from a self-determination theory perspective. Industrial and Organizational Perspectives, 1, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. K., Hersovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  32. Palanski, M. E., Kahai, S. S., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Team virtues and performance: An examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and leadership: Clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Impact of behavioral integrity on follower job performance: A three-study examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 765–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simons, T. L. (1999). Behavioral integrity as a critical ingredient for transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simons, T. L. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simons, T. L. (2008). The integrity dividend: Leading by the power of your word. Jossey Bass: San Francisco.Google Scholar
  39. Simons, T. L., Friedman, R., Liu, L. A., & McLean-Parks, J. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among black and non-black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 650–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simons, T. L., & McLean-Parks, J. (2000). The sequential impact of behavior integrity on trust, commitment, discretionary service behavior, customer satisfaction, and profitability. Paper presented at the annual Academy of Management Conference, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
  41. Simons, T., Tomlinson, E., & Leroy, H. (2011). Research on behavioral integrity: A promising construct for positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sparrowe, R. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 419–439.Google Scholar
  43. Verbos, A. K., Gerard, J. A., Forshey, P. R., Harding, C. S., & Miller, J. S. (2007). The positive ethical organization: Enacting a living code of ethics and ethical organizational identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and analysis of a multidimensional theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J., & Oke, A. (2011). Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of positivity and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 89–126.Google Scholar
  46. Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 901–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 695–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannes Leroy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael E. Palanski
    • 2
  • Tony Simons
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Center of Organization StudiesKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Rochester Institute of TechnologyRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations