Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 106, Issue 4, pp 491–502

Moral Stress: Considering the Nature and Effects of Managerial Moral Uncertainty

  • Scott J. Reynolds
  • Bradley P. Owens
  • Alex L. Rubenstein


To better illuminate aspects of stress that are relevant to the moral domain, we present a definition and theoretical model of “moral stress.” Our definition posits that moral stress is a psychological state born of an individual’s uncertainty about his or her ability to fulfill relevant moral obligations. This definition assumes a self-and-others relational basis for moral stress. Accordingly, our model draws from a theory of the self (identity theory) and a theory of others (stakeholder theory) to suggest that this uncertainty arises as a manager faces competing claims for limited resources from multiple stakeholders and/or across multiple role identities. We further propose that the extent to which the manager is attentive to the moral aspects of the claims (i.e., moral attentiveness) moderates these effects. We identify several consequences of managerial moral stress and discuss theoretical, empirical, and practical implications of our approach. Most importantly, we argue that this work paves an important path for considering stress through the lens of morality.


Moral stress Moral decision-making Moral behavior 


  1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.Google Scholar
  4. Badaracco, J. L. Jr. (1997). Defining moments: When managers must choose between right and right. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Badaracco, J. L. Jr. (2001). We don’t need another hero. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 120–126.Google Scholar
  6. Barley, S. R., & Knight, D. B. (1992). Toward a cultural theory of stress complaints. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 1–48.Google Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., Dewall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32, 73–88.Google Scholar
  9. Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2004). Experiencing mistreatment at work: The role of grievance filing, nature of mistreatment, and employee withdrawal. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, A. B., & Skattebo, A. (2004). What is acceptable for women may not be for men: The effect of family conflicts with work on job-performance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butterfield, K. D., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53, 981–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke, R. A., & Rousseau, D. M. (1984). Stress and strain from family roles and work role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corley, M. C., Elswick, R. K., Gorman, M., & Clor, T. (2001). Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
  17. Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fiedler, F. E. (1993). The leadership situation and the black box in contingency theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 1–28). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, R. T. (2001). Role stress, the Type A behavior pattern, and external auditor job satisfaction and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.Google Scholar
  23. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom (with the assistance of Rose D. Friedman). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ganster, D. C. (2005). Executive job demands: Suggestions from a stress and decision-making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 492–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glasberg, A. L., Eriksson, S., Dahlqvist, V., Lindahl, E., Strandberg, G., Söderberg, A., et al. (2006). Development and initial validation of the stress of conscience questionnaire. Nursing Ethics, 13, 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, K. M. (2006). Too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of leader-member exchange on stress. Journal of Social Psychology, 146(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hemingway, M. A., & Smith, C. S. (1999). Organizational climate and occupational stressors as predictors of withdrawal behaviours and injuries in nurses. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunter, L. W., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2007). Feeling the heat: Effects of stress, commitment, and job experience on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issues-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  36. Kahn, R. L., & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 571–650). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kant, I. (1785/1994). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. In Ethical philosophy (2nd ed., J. W. Ellington, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Kidder, R. M. (1995). How good people make tough choices. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  40. Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  42. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. LePine, J. A., LePine, M. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal Applied Psychology, 89, 883–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewis, M. (2000). The self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, shame, pride, and guilt. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 623–636). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  48. Lindsay-Hartz, J. (1984). Contrasting experiences of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lützén, K., Cronqvist, A., Magnusson, A., & Andersson, L. (2003). Moral stress: Synthesis of a concept. Nursing Ethics, 10, 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lyons, N. P. (1994). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality. In B. Puka (Ed.), Moral development: A compendium. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Macmillan, M. B. (2000). An odd kind of fame: Stories of Phineas Gage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. F. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 586–853.Google Scholar
  54. Morris, S. A., Rehbein, K. A., Hosseini, J. C., & Armacost, R. L. (1995). A test of environmental, situational, and personal influences on the ethical intentions of CEOs. Business and Society, 34, 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Motowidlo, S. J., Packard, J. S., & Manning, M. R. (1986). Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 618–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Netemeyer, R. G., Maxham, J. G., I. I. I., & Pullig, C. (2005). Conflicts in the work-family interface: Links to job stress, customer service employee performance, and customer purchase intent. Journal of Marketing, 69, 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parkes, K. R. (1985). Coping in stressful episodes: The role of individual differences, environmental factors, and situational characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1277–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pierce, M. A., & Henry, J. W. (2000). Judgments about computer ethics: Do individual, co-worker, and company judgments differ? Do company codes make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Extending the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: A meta-analytic test of differential relationships with job attitudes and retention criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business and Society, 43, 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  63. Reynolds, S. J. (2006a). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reynolds, S. J. (2006b). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1027–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reynolds, S. J., Schultz, F. C., & Hekman, D. R. (2006). Balancing stakeholder interests: The constraining effects of resource divisibility and stakeholder saliency. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sauter, S. L., & Murphy, L. R. (1995). Organizational risk factors for job stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schuler, R. S. (1980). Definition and conceptualization of stress in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 184–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Selye, H. (1953). The general-adaptation-syndrome in its relationships to neurology, psychology, and psychopathology. In W. Arthur (Ed.), Contributions toward medical psychology: Theory and psychodiagnostic methods (Vol. 1, pp. 234–274). New York: Ronald Press Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  72. Selye, H. (1975). Confusion and controversy in the stress field. Journal of Human Stress, 1, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. (1977). Designs for crisis decision units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 640–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational-behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  76. Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: A theory and research example. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tangney, J. P., & Fischer, K. W. (1995). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  78. Tracy, J. L., & Robbins, R. W. (2006). Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1339–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.Google Scholar
  80. VanSandt, C. V., & Neck, C. P. (2003). Bridging ethics and self leadership: Overcoming ethical discrepancies between employee and organizational standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Waters, J. A., & Bird, F. (1987). The moral dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Wilkinson, J. M. (1987/1988). Moral distress in nursing practice: Experience and effect. Nursing Forum, 23, 16–29.Google Scholar
  85. Wyld, D. C., & Jones, C. A. (1997). The importance of context: The ethical work climate construct and models of ethical decision making—an agenda for research. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott J. Reynolds
    • 1
  • Bradley P. Owens
    • 2
  • Alex L. Rubenstein
    • 3
  1. 1.Foster School of BusinessUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.School of ManagementSUNY BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  3. 3.Department of Management, Warrington College of Business AdministrationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations