Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 105, Issue 3, pp 337–356 | Cite as

Stakeholder-Defined Corporate Responsibility for a Pre-Credit-Crunch Financial Service Company: Lessons for How Good Reputations are Won and Lost



This paper presents a study that identifies a stakeholder-defined concept of Corporate Responsibility (CR) in the context of a UK financial service organisation in the immediate pre-credit crunch era. From qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups with employees and customers, we identify, in a wide-ranging stakeholder-defined concept of CR, six themes that together imply two necessary conditions for a firm to be regarded as responsible—both corporate actions and character must be consonant with CR. This provides both empirical support for a notable, recent theoretical contribution by Godfrey (in Acad Manag Rev 30:777–798, 2005) and novel lessons for reputation management practice.


Corporate Responsibility Stakeholders Reputation 


  1. Ahmad, S. J., O‘Regan, N., & Ghobadian, A. (2003). Managing for performance: Corporate responsibility and internal stakeholders. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, & R. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–42). Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  3. Arjoon, S. (2005). Corporate governance: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, A. B., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening Stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant leadership: Renewing yourself and connecting with others through mindfulness, hope and compassion. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Books.Google Scholar
  8. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13, 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromley, D. (2002). Comparing corporate reputations: League tables, quotients, benchmarks or case studies? Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, R. (2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organization Studies, 26, 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, A. B. (1998). The 4 faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2000). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. London: Random House Business Books.Google Scholar
  16. Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J., & Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organisational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5, 211–217.Google Scholar
  17. Cowton, C. J. (2002). Integrity, responsibility and affinity: Three aspects of ethics in banking. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cramer, J., Van der Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Balancing between thinking and acting. Paper presented at the inter-disciplinary CSR research conference, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  19. Crook, C. (2005). The good company: A survey of corporate social responsibility (pp. 3–18). London: The Economist Newspaper.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. V., & Roper, S. (2003). Corporate reputation and competitiveness. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
  23. Duska, R. F. (2005). A look at integrity in financial services. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 59, 26–28.Google Scholar
  24. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. Elkington, J. (2001). The chrysalis economy. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame and Fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15, 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2002). The global reputation quotient project: First steps towards a cross-nationally valid measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4, 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  36. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grayson, D., & Hodges, A. (2005). Why CSR has lost its way. European Business Forum, 20, 33.Google Scholar
  40. Gunter, M. (2006). The green machine. Fortune Magazine, July.
  41. Hanke, T., & Stark, W. (2009). Strategy development: Conceptual framework on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2009). Segmenting stakeholders in terms of corporate responsibility: Implications for reputation management. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoffman, S., & Muller, S. (2009). Consumer boycotts due to factory relocation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.Google Scholar
  45. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34, 1152–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organization research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. MacMillan, K., Money, K., & Downing, S. (2000). Successful business relationships. Journal of General Management, 26, 69–83.Google Scholar
  49. MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrand, C. (2004). Giving your organisation SPIRIT: An overview and call to action for directors on issues of corporate governance, corporate reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of General Management, 30, 15–42.Google Scholar
  50. MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrand, C. (2005). Reputation in relationships: Measuring experiences, emotions and behaviors. Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mahon, J. F., & Wartick, S. L. (2003). Dealing with stakeholders: How reputation, credibility and framing influence the game. Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 457–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Miles, M. P., Munilla, L. S., & Darroch, J. (2006). The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 1, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics, 15, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Menguec, B. (2005). Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 1184–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. New York Times. (2004). The republicans: The convention in New York—Bush accepts: ‘Our tested and confident nation can achieve anything’. New York Times, September 3 (accessed at on September 9, 2010).Google Scholar
  63. New York Times. (2005). When the Joneses wear jeans. New York Times, May 29 (accessed at on September 9, 2010).Google Scholar
  64. New York Times. (2008a). What created this monster? New York Times, March 23 (accessed at on September 9, 2010).Google Scholar
  65. New York Times. (2008b). The housing-loan crisis. New York Times, October 26 (accessed at on September 9, 2010).Google Scholar
  66. Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pater, A., & van Lierop, L. (2006). Sense and sensitivity: The roles of organisation and stakeholders in managing corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & Society, 43, 296–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Polonsky, M. J., & Jevons, C. (2006). Understanding issue complexity when building a socially responsible brand. European Business Review, 18, 340–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Polonsky, M. J., & Scott, D. (2005). An empirical examination of the stakeholder strategy matrix. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 1199–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 433–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Roome, N., & Jonker, J. 2004. Whistling in the dark. Paper presented at the inter-disciplinary CSR research conference, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  74. Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1413–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sachs, S., & Ruehli, E. (2005). Changing managers’ values towards a broader stakeholder orientation. Corporate Governance, 5, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schnietz, K. E., & Epstein, M. J. (2005). Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scholder Ellen, P., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 158–166.Google Scholar
  79. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smidts, A., Pruyn, T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1051–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sonenshein, S. (2010). We’re changing—or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic changes implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 477–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  84. Vitell, S. J., & Hidalgo, E. R. (2006). The impact of corporate ethical values and enforcement of ethical codes on the perceived importance of ethics in business: A comparison of U.S. and Spanish managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vogel, D. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47, 19–45.Google Scholar
  86. Waddock, S. (2002). Leading corporate citizens. Vision, values, value added. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  87. Waddock, S. (2003). What will it take to create a tipping point for corporate responsibility? Working paper no. 21, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
  88. Waddock, S. (2004a). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109, 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Waddock, S. (2004b). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Waddock, S., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walsh, G., Mitchell, V.-W., Jackson, P. R., & Beatty, S. E. (2009). Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal of Management, 20, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–770.Google Scholar
  93. Williams, R. J., & Barrett, J. D. (2000). Corporate philanthropy, criminal activity, and firm reputation: Is there a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.Google Scholar
  96. Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wood, D. J., Logsdon, J. M., Lewellyn, P. G., & Davenport, K. (2006). Global business citizenship. A transformative framework for ethics and sustainable capitalism. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  98. Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carola Hillenbrand
    • 1
  • Kevin Money
    • 1
  • Stephen Pavelin
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Management, Henley Business SchoolUniversity of ReadingHenley-on-Thames, OxfordshireUK
  2. 2.School of EconomicsUniversity of ReadingReading, BerkshireUK

Personalised recommendations