Skip to main content

Empathy, Connectedness and Organisation

Journal of Business Ethics volume 105, pages 131–137 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

In this paper, we conceptually explore the role of empathy as a connectedness organising mechanism. We expand ideas underlying positive organisational scholarship and examine leading-edge studies from neuroscience and quantum physics that give support to our claims. The perspective we propose has profound implications regarding how we organise and how we manage. First, we argue that empathy enhances connectedness through the unconscious sharing of neuro-pathways that dissolves the barriers between self and other. This sharing encourages the integration of affective and cognitive consciousness which facilitates the ability to find common ground for solution building. Second, empathy enhances connectedness through altruistic action. In giving to others, feelings of joy and harmony are activated. This in turn allows personal freedom to be enriched and transcendence from the rational ego-self is reduced to develop a more expansive, integrated and enlightened state underlying connectedness. Finally, empathy enhances connectedness which results in sharing the quantum field of coherence where there is little separation between self and other. This means living beyond self-interest in a coherent world based upon interdependent wholeness rather than atomization and separation. Empathy allows us to find that state of coherent connectedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Armour, A., & Ardell, J. (2004). Basic and clinical neurocardiology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgo, D. (2007). Free jazz in the classroom: An ecological approach to music education. Jazz Perspectives, 1(1), 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., Ryan, R., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, M. (2007). Go put your strength to work. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1999). The Tao of physics. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caza, B., & Caza, A. (2008). Positive organizational scholarship: A critical theory perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J. (2010). West meets east: Enlightening, balancing and transcending. In Conference call for the 71st Academy of Management conference, San Antonio, 8–12 August, 2011.

  • Chia, R. (1999). A rhizomic model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management, 10, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2005). Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to collective outcomes. Paper Presented at the 65th Annual Academy of Management Meeting, August 2005.

  • Cooper, R. (2005). Relationality. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1689–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner, P. (2009). Workplace spirituality and business ethics: Insights from an eastern spiritual tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 377–389. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9776-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., & Santorelli, S. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 570–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (2006). Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J., & Heaphy, E. (2003). The power of high quality connections. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 263–278). San-Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J., Worline, M., Frost, P., & Lilius, J. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 59–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emory University Health Services Center: n/d, Emory Brain Imaging Studies Reveal Biological Basis for Human Cooperation. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/07/020718075131.htm.

  • Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73(6), 2608–2611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gano-Overway, L., Newton, M., Magyar, T., Fry, M., Kim, M., & Guivernau, M. (2009). Influence of caring youth sport contexts on efficacy-related beliefs and social behaviours. American Psychological Association, 45(2), 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greason, P., & Cashwell, G. (2009). Mindfulness and counseling self-efficacy: The mediating role of attention and empathy. Counselor Education & Supervision, 49, 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. (2010). Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organisation–stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 425–438. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0414-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Leitch, C., & Chia, R. (2007). Developing paradigmatic awareness in university business schools: The challenge for executive education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(3), 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D., & Fineman, S. (1990). Organizing processes. Journal of Management Studies, 27(6), 583–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, W., Davis, K., Lozano, A., Tasker, R., & Dostrovsky, J. (1999). Pain-related neurons in the human cingulated cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(5), 403–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring people: The science of empathy and how we connect with others. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobani, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3, e79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahnke, K., & Cooperrider, D. (2008). Appreciative inquiry: Inquiring new questions and dreaming new dreams. In L. Tischler & G. Biberman (Eds.), Spirituality in business: Theory, practice, and future directions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (1995). The interconnected universe: Conceptual foundations of a transdisciplinary unified theory. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, S., Kerr, C., Wasserman, R., Gray, J., Greve, D., & Treadway, M. (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. NeuroReport, 16(17), 1893–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilius, J., Worline, M., Dutton, J., Kanov, J., Frost, P., & Maitlis, S. (2008). Contours of compassion at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., & Robertson, P. (2010). Spirituality in the workplace: Theory and measurement. Journal of Management Inquiry. doi:10.1177/1056492610374648.

  • Masserman, J. H., Wechkin, S., & Terris, W. (1964). “Altruistic” behavior in rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Psychiatry, 121, 584–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, L. (2007). The intention experiment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natale, S., & Sora, S. (2010). Ethics in strategic thinking: Business processes and the global market collapse. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 309–316. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0270-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberman, L., & Ramachandran, V. (2007). The simulating social mind: The role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 310–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Origgi, G., & Sperber, D. (2000). Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language and meta-cognition (pp. 140–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parameshwar, S. (2006). Inventing higher purpose through suffering: The transformation of the transformational leader. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 454–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. (2007). Lift: Becoming a positive force in any situation. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. (2005). Shifting the lens on organizational life: The added value of positive scholarship. Academy of Management Review, 31, 292–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, P. (2006). The global brain [Motion picture]. Las Vegas: Elf Rock Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J., Stapp, H., & Beauregard, M. (2005). Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: A neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 360(1458), 1309–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 413–429. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9743-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. (2007). The mindful brain. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. (2008). Does empathy trigger only altruistic motivation? How about selflessness or justice? Emotion, 8(6), 766–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2009). Leading corporate citizens. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., & Putnam, T. (2006). Organizing for mindfulness: Eastern wisdom and western knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (2004). Spiritual capital. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Strategy and Human Resource Management, Unviersity of Waikato Management School, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Kathryn Pavlovich

  2. Montford College of Business, University of Northern Colorado, Greerly, CO, 80639, USA

    Keiko Krahnke

Authors
  1. Kathryn Pavlovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keiko Krahnke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Pavlovich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlovich, K., Krahnke, K. Empathy, Connectedness and Organisation. J Bus Ethics 105, 131–137 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0961-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0961-3

Keywords

  • Connectedness
  • Empathy
  • Interdependence
  • Organisation
  • Quantum