Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 105, Issue 2, pp 187–196 | Cite as

Marketization of Education: An Ethical Dilemma

  • Samuel M. NataleEmail author
  • Caroline Doran


The Marketing of Education has become epidemic. Business practices and principles now commonly suffuse the approach and administration of Higher Education in an attempt to make schools both more competitive and “branded.” This seems to be progressing without reference to the significant ethical challenges as well as the growing costs to society, students, and educators in pursuing a model with such inherent conflicts. The increased focus on narrowly defined degrees targeted to specific job requirements rather than the focus on raising the level of students’ ability to engage in more abstract and critical thinking is accelerating. The impact on student world views and the lack of engagement with meaningful and challenging discourse has severely impaired their ability to become both engaged and reflective. This model has also impacted faculty morale as concern with lack of academic rigor continues to grow. An ethical crisis has emerged within education internationally and intervention is urgently needed.


Education Marketization of education Ethics in education College rankings Enrollment management Faculty morale Merit-based aid 


  1. Altbach, P. G. (2009, April 30). It’s the faculty, stupid! The Times Higher Education Supplement, 1894, 40.Google Scholar
  2. Benton, T. H. (2011, February). A perfect storm in undergraduate education, Part I. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
  3. Bohm, A., Davis, D., Meares, D., & Pearce, D. (2002). The global student mobility 2025 report: Forecasts of the global demand for international education. Canberra: IDP.Google Scholar
  4. Bridenthal, R. (2005, August). Review of the book University, inc: The corporate corruption of higher education, by J. Washburn. Radical Teacher, 73, 35–37.Google Scholar
  5. Daniel, J. (2006). Preface. In J. Knight (Ed.), Higher education crossing borders: A guide to the implications of the general agreement on trade in services (GATS) for cross-border education. Commonwealth of Learning and UNESCO.Google Scholar
  6. Diver, C. (2005, November). Is there life after rankings? The Atlantic. Retrieved from
  7. Edirisooriya, G. (2009). A market analysis of the latter half of the nineteenth-century American higher education sector. History of Education, 38(1), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmiston, D. (2009). An examination of integrated marketing communication in US public institutions of higher education. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 8(3), 152–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehrenberg, R. C. (2005). Method or madness? Inside the U.S. News & World Report college rankings. Journal of College Admission, 189, 29–35.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs, P. (2001). Higher education as a market: A problem or solution? Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldspink, C. (2007). Rethinking educational reform. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hossler, D. (2000). The problem with college rankings. About Campus, 5, 20–24.Google Scholar
  13. Hossler, D. R. (2004). How enrollment management has transformed—or ruined—higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 34, B3.Google Scholar
  14. IES (2009). Digest of education statistics: Chapter 3 post secondary education. Retrieved from
  15. Kaplan, G. R. (1996). Profits r us: notes on the commercialization of America’s schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 1–12. Retrieved March 17, 2011, from EBSCOhost. Google Scholar
  16. Klassen, M. L. (2000). Lots of fun, not much work, and no hassles: Marketing images of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(2), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knight, J. (2006). Higher education crossing borders: A guide to the implications of the general agreement on trade in services (GATS) for cross-border education. Commonwealth of Learning and UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  18. Lingenfelter, P. E. (2006). The unfunding of public education. Presented at the Public Affairs Week, Baruch College, City College of New York. Retrieved from
  19. Lock, G., & Lorenz, C. (2007). Revisiting the university front. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26, 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marklein, M. B. (2007). Colleges taking another look at value of merit-based aid. USA Today. Retrieved from
  21. Marris, E. (2005). Corporate culture nets big bucks for university heads. Nature, 434, 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsuura, K. (2006). Foreword. In J. Knight (Ed.), Higher education crossing borders: A guide to the implications of the general agreement on trade in services (GATS) for cross-border education. Commonwealth of Learning and UNESCO.Google Scholar
  23. Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyerson, G. (2005, August). Review of the book Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education review, by D. Bok. Radical Teacher, 73, 33–35.Google Scholar
  25. Miscamble, W. D. (2006). The corporate university: A Catholic response. America, 14–17.Google Scholar
  26. Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman, S., & Jahdi, K. (2009). Marketisation of education: Marketing, rhetoric and reality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ng, I. C. L., & Forbes, J. (2009). Education as service: The understanding of university experience through the service logic. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19(1), 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicholls, J., Harris, J., Morgan, E., Clarke, K., & Sims, D. (1995). Marketing higher education: The MBA experience. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(2), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raduntz, H. (2007). Chapter 13: The Marketization of Education within the Global Capitalist Economy. In Globalizing Education: Policies, Pedagogies, & Politics (pp. 231–245). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C. (2010). Grading in American colleges and universities. Retrieved from
  32. SHEEO. (2009). State higher education finance FY 2008. Retrieved from
  33. Sigler, W. (2007). The age of outcomes. College and University, 83(2), 53–56, 58–60.Google Scholar
  34. Thacker, L. (2005). Confronting the commercialization of admissions. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(25), B26. Retrieved March 17, 2011, from EBSCOhost.Google Scholar
  35. Tilak, J. B. G. (2009). Higher education: A public good or a commodity for trade? Prospects, 38, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yassi, A., Dharamsi, S., Speigel, J., Rojas, A., Dean, E., & Woolard, R. (2010). The good, the bad, and the ugly of partnered research: Revisiting the sequestration thesis and the role of universities in promoting social justice. International Journal of Health Services, 40(3), 485–505.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kellogg CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordEngland, UK
  2. 2.St. Mary’s College of CaliforniaMoragaUSA

Personalised recommendations