Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 104, Issue 2, pp 269–282 | Cite as

Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability and Price Effects on Consumer Responses

  • Sungchul ChoiEmail author
  • Alex Ng


The lack of attention to sustainability, as a concept with multiple dimensions, has presented a developmental gap in green marketing literature, sustainability, and marketing literature for decades. Based on the established premise of customer–corporate (C–C) identification, in which consumers respond favorably to companies with corporate social responsibility initiatives that they identify with, we propose that consumers would respond similarly to companies with sustainability initiatives. We postulate that consumers care about protecting and preserving favorable economic environments (an economic dimension of sustainability) as much as they care about natural environments. Thus, we investigate how two sustainability dimensions (i.e., environmental and economic) and price can influence consumer responses. Using an experimental method, we demonstrate that consumers favor sustainability in both dimensions by giving positive evaluations of the company and purchase intent. In addition, consumers respond more negatively to poor company sustainability than to high company sustainability. In comparison, consumers respond more negatively to the company’s poor commitment to caring for the environment than to the company’s poor commitment to economic sustainability. We also find that consumers do not respond favorably to low prices when they have information about the firm’s poor environmental sustainability. Finally, we find support for an interaction effect between consumer support for sustainability and corporate sustainability; that is, consumers evaluate a company more favorably if the company shares the consumers’ social causes. Overall, we conclude, from our empirical study, support for the idea that consumers do respond to multiple dimensions of sustainability.


Sustainability Environment Economical Experiment Consumer responses 


  1. Baghi, I., Rubaltelli, E., & Tedeschi, M. (2009). A strategy to communicate corporate social responsibility: Cause related marketing and its dark side. Journal of Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 15–26.Google Scholar
  2. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), 139–168.Google Scholar
  3. Belz, F., & Peattie, K. (2009). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. West-Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & van Bruggen, G. H. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, Peter. A. (1997). The company and the product: Consumer associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 68, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chabowski, B. R., Mena, J. A., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronin, J. J., Smith, J. S., Gleim, M. R., Ramirez, E., & Martinez, J. D. (2011). Green marketing strategies: An examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeSimone, L., & Popoff, F. (1997). Eco-efficiency: The business link to sustainable development. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Duton, J. M., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Figge, F., & T. Hahn. (2001). Sustainable value added measuring corporate contributions to sustainability. In Conference proceedings on the 2001 business strategy and the environment conference (pp. 83–92). Leeds: Leeds University, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hockerts, K. (1996). The SusTainAbility Radar (STAR*), a step towards corporate sustainability accounting. Discussion paper. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Hockerts, K. (1999). The sustainability radar—a tool for the innovation of sustainable products and services. Greener Management International, 25, 29–49.Google Scholar
  17. Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2003). Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Isa, M. K. M. (2003, May 12). Applying the triple bottom line approach. Business Times.Google Scholar
  19. Kassiola, J. J. (2003). Explorations in environmental political theory: thinking about what we value (p. 12). Armonk, NY: M E Sharpe.Google Scholar
  20. Ketola, T. (2008). A holistic corporate responsibility model: Integrating values, discourses and actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2005). How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics, 55(4), 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Milliman, J., Von Glinow, M. A., & Nathan, M. (1991). Organizational life cycles and strategic international human resource management in multinational companies: Implications for congruence theory. Academy of Management Review, 16, 318–339.Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, R. W., Wooliscroft, B., & Higham, J. (2010). Sustainable market orientation: A new approach to managing marketing strategy. Journal of Macromarketing, 20(2), 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. L. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To Be or Not to Be: Central Questions in Organizational Identification. In David. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171–207). Thousand Oaks, CA): Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Prothero, A., McDonagh, P., & Dobscha, S. (2010). Is green the new black? Reflections on a green commodity discourse. Journal of Macromarketing, 20(2), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pujari, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. (2003). Green and competitive influences on environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 56, 657–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rios, F. J. M., Martinez, T. L., Moreno, F. F., & Soriano, P. C. (2006). Improving attitudes toward brands with environmental associations: An experimental approach. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaefer, A., & Crane, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability and consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaltegger S., & Sturm. A. (1998). Eco-efficiency by eco-controlling. Zürich: VDF.Google Scholar
  34. Schaltegger, S., & Sturm, A. (1990). Okologische Rationalitat. Die Unternehmung, 4, 273–290.Google Scholar
  35. Schaltegger, S., & Sturm, A. (1992). O¨ kologieorientierte Entscheidungen in Unternehmen. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  36. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh, J., de los Salmones Sanchez, M. M. G., & del Bosque, I. R. (2008). Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets: A cross-cultural evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United Nations. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Available at
  40. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). American FactFinder. Available at
  41. Varey, R. J. (2010). Marketing means and ends for a sustainable society: A welfare agenda for transformative change. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Venkatesh, R., & Mahajan, V. (1997). Products with branded components: An approach for premium pricing and partner selection. Marketing Science, 16(2), 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada

Personalised recommendations