Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, 104:59 | Cite as

Investigating the Effects of Moral Disengagement and Participation on Unethical Work Behavior

  • Adam Barsky
Article

Abstract

With massive corruption uncovered in numerous recent corporate scandals, investigating psychological processes underlying unethical behavior among employees has become a critical area of research for organizational scientists. This article seeks to explain why people engage in deceptive and fraudulent activities by focusing on the use of moral-disengagement tactics or rationalizations to justify egregious actions at work. In addition, participation in goal-setting is argued to attenuate the relationship between moral disengagement and unethical behavior. Across two studies, a lab simulation and field survey, a measure of moral disengagement was developed for use with working adults. The hypothesized main and interactive effects of moral disengagement, participation, and unethical behavior were tested and largely confirmed.

Keywords

Moral disengagement Business ethics Participation Self-regulation 

References

  1. Agle, B. R., & Caldwell, C. B. (1999). Understanding research on values in business. Business and Society, 38(3), 326–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., & Budhwar, P. S. (2004). Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 1389–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A., Barbaranaelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barsky, A. (2008). Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal-setting: A review and theory development. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barsky, A., & Kaplan, S. (2007). If you feel bad, it’s unfair: A quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bersoff, D. M. (2001). Why good people sometimes do bad things: Motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. In J. Dienhart, D. Moberg, & R. Duska (Eds.), The next phase of business ethics: Integrating psychology and ethics (Vol. 3, pp. 239–262). New York: JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beu, D. S., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). This is war: How the politically astute achieve crimes of obedience through the use of moral disengagement. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bok, S. (1978). Lying to children. The Hastings Center Report, 8(3), 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowen, S. (2004). Organizational factors encouraging ethical decision making: An exploration into the case of an exemplar. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R. R., Pugh, S. D., & Vaslow, J. B. (2000). Just doing business: Modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, M., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  22. Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Froggartt, K. L., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., et al. (1988). Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13, 8–22.Google Scholar
  23. Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 1019–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cullen, J. B., Victor, B., & Stephens, C. (2001). An ethical weather report assessing the organizations ethical climate. Organizational Dynamics, 79, 50–62.Google Scholar
  25. Dachler, H. P., & Wilpert, B. (1978). Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., & Huber, G. P. (2000). Moral intensity and managerial problem solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eichenwald, K. (2002). Andersen guilty in effort to block inquiry on Enron. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  29. Eichenwald, K. (2005). A conspiracy of fools: A true story. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  30. Erez, M., Earley, P. C., & Hulin, C. L. (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as a moral virtue. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 13–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Frey, B. F. (2000). The impact of moral intensity on decision making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Friedrich, C. J. (1937). Constitutional government and politics. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
  36. Glanz, J. (2004, May 9). Torture is often a temptation and almost never works. The New York Times, A4. Google Scholar
  37. Gottlieb, J. Z., & Sanzgiri, J. (1996). Towards an ethical dimension of decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1275–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Green, S., & Weber, J. (1997). Influencing ethical development: Exposing students to the AICPA code of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 777–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenberg, J. (1998). The cognitive geometry of employee theft: Negotiating “the line” between taking and stealing. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 147–193). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  40. Griffin, R. W., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (2004). The dark side of organizational behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Grover, S. (1993). Lying, deceit, and subterfuge: A model of dishonesty in the workplace. Organization Science, 4, 478–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grover, S. (2005). The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: The causes and management of workplace lying. The Academy of Management Executive, 19, 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  44. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1992). LISREL VIII: Analysis of linear structural relations. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  45. Kohlberg, L. (1969). The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  46. Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54, 576–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kramer, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Ethical cognition and the framing of organizational dilemmas: Decision makers as intuitive lawyers. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics (pp. 59–85). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Latham, G. P. (2001). The reciprocal effects of science on practice: Insights from the practice and science of goal-setting. Canadian Psychology, 42, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Latham, G. P., & Marshall, H. A. (1982). The effects of self-set, participatively set and assigned goals on the performance of government employees. Personnel Psychology, 35, 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Latham, G. P., Steele, T. P., & Saari, L. M. (1982). The effects of participation and goal difficulty on performance. Personnel Psychology, 35, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Latham, G. P., Winters, D. C., & Locke, E. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leana, C. R., Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1990). Fact and fiction in analyzing participation research: A critique of Cotton, Vellrath, Froggatt, Lengnick-Hall, and Jennings. Academy of Management Review, 15, 137–147.Google Scholar
  54. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preference. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 68–90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1984). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2009). Has goal setting gone wild or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979). Participation in decision-making: One more look. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 265–339). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  59. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision-making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ludwig, T. D., & Geller, E. S. (1997). Assigned versus participative goal setting and response generalization: Managing injury control among professional pizza deliverers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lund, D. B. (2000). An empirical examination of marketing professionals: Ethical behavior in differing situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intention. Business Society, 41(1), 84–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Messick, D. M., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1996). Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  65. Miller, K. I., & Monge, P. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction and productivity: A meta analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 727–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mitchell, T. R. (1973). Motivation and participation: An integration. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 670–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Molinsky, A. L., & Margolis, J. D. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Murphy, K. R. (1993). Honesty in the workplace. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  69. Newman, K. (1993). Procedural justice and ethical decision-making. Social Justice Research, 6, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Eaglewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  71. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ordonez, L. D., Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). On good scholarship, goal setting, and scholars gone wild. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pelton, J., Ground, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2003). The moral disengagement scale: Extension with an American minority sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Peterson, D. K. (2002). The relationship between unethical behavior and the dimensions of the ethical climate questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  78. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schweitzer, M., & Gibson, D. (2008). Fairness, feelings, and ethical decision- making: Consequences of violating community standards of fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schweitzer, M., Ordonez, L. D., & Douma, B. (2004). The dark side of goal setting: The role of goals in motivating unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Simon, H. A. (1945). Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  83. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Somers, M. J. (2001). Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: A study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stevenson, R. W. (1992, June 17). Sears ducks, then tries to cover. The New York Times, D1.Google Scholar
  88. Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tang, T. L.-P., & Chiu, R. K. (2003). Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: Is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong employees? Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1998). Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 330–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 684–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  94. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  95. Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2003). Managing ethics in business organizations: A social science perspective. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2001). Organizational justice and ethics program follow through: Influences on employees’ helpful and harmful behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(4), 651–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Umphress, E. (2003). In the name of the company: Unethical behaviors perpetrated by employees in response to fair treatment and accountability. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 64, 989.Google Scholar
  100. U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology. (1986, October 29). Investigation of the challenger accident; report of the committee on science and technology, house of representatives. US Government Printing Office. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/challenger/64_420.pdf.
  101. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28, 622–632.Google Scholar
  103. Weber, J. (1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2001). Investigating influences on managers’ moral reasoning: The impact of context and personal and organizational factors. Business Society, 40(1), 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and MarketingThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations