New Approaches to Evaluating the Performance of Corporate–Community Partnerships: A Case Study from the Minerals Sector

Abstract

A continuing challenge for researchers and practitioners alike is the lack of data on the effectiveness of corporate–community investment programmes. The focus of this article is on the minerals industry, where companies currently face the challenge of matching corporate drivers for strategic partnership with community needs for programmes that contribute to local and regional sustainability. While many global mining companies advocate a strategic approach to partnerships, there is no evidence currently available that suggests companies are monitoring these partnerships to see if they do, in fact, represent ‘strategic’ investments. This article argues that applying the management concept of ‘investment performance’ to corporate–community partnerships requires questioning traditional evaluation methods that focus on the results of programmes or activities. We adopt a case study approach to introduce an evaluation framework that considers performance from both corporate and community perspectives and that conceptualises partnership performance as comprising four aspects: (1) the contribution of the partnership to the overall portfolio of a company’s community investment programmes, (2) the appropriateness of the partnership model, (3) the effectiveness of the partnering relationship and (4) the ability of the partners to achieve programme goals. The application of this evaluation framework to an established corporate–community partnership programme provided some useful insights as to how partnership performance can be improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A., Ganapathi, J.: 2007, ‘Putting the s back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations’, Academy of Management Review Vol. 32 (3): 836–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B. and Rahman, S. (eds): 2002, ‘Unfolding stakeholder thinking: theory, responsibility and engagement’, Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett, M.L.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review Vol. 32 (3): 794–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, C.: 1975, ‘Up the Hierarchy’, Journal of Extension 13(2): 7-12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchholz, R.A. and Rosenthal, S.B.: 2006, ‘Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1): 137-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Business Partners for Development: 2002a, Endearing Myths, Enduring Truths: Enabling Partnerships Between Business, the Civil Society and the Public Sector (Knowledge Resource Group, Business Partners for Development, London).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Business Partners for Development: 2002b, Tri-Sector Partnership Results and Recommendations: Putting Partnering to Work (Business Partners for Development, London).

  8. Caplan, K., J. Mugabi and L. Stott: 2006, Turning Partnership Evaluation on Its Head: Considerations for Partnership Practitioners (Draft), (Building Partnerships for Development, London). Retrieved September 7, 2007, from www.bpdws.org.

  9. Carroll, A.B.: 1989, ‘Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management’, Cincinnati: South-West.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chandra, S.: 2003, ‘Regional Economy Size and the Growth-Instability Frontier: Evidence from Europe’, Journal of Regional Science 43 (1): 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandra, S. and Shadel, W.G.: 2007, ‘Crossing disciplinary boundaries: Applying financial portfolio theory to model the organization of the self-concept’, Journal of Research in Personality 41 (2): 346–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarkson, M.: 1996, ‘Redefining the Corporation: A Stakeholder Perspective’, Policy Options (December), 6–10.

  13. Clarkson, M: 1998, ‘The Corporation and its stakeholders: classic and contemporary readings’, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Covey, J. and L. D. Brown: 2001, Critical Cooperation: An Alternative Form of Civil Society-Business Engagement (Institute for Development Research Reports No. 17(1), London).

  15. Cragg, W. and Greenbaum, A.: 2002, ‘Reasoning about responsibilities: mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed,’ Journal of Business Ethics 39: 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dashwood, H.: 2007, ‘Towards sustainable mining: The corporate role in the construction of global standards’, The Multination Business Review, 15(1): 47-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Esteves, A.M.: 2008, ‘Evaluating community investments in the mining sector using multi-criteria decision analysis to integrate SIA with business planning’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28: 338–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman, R.E.: 1984, ‘Strategic management: a stakeholder approach’, Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goodpaster, K.: 1991, ‘Business ethics and stakeholder analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Googins, B.K. and Rochlin, S.A.: 2000, ‘Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships’, Business and Society Review 105 (1): 127-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gunningham, N., Kagan, R.A. and Thornton, D. 2004 ‘Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance’, Law and Social Inquiry 29 (2): 307-341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, T.M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics’, Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 404-37.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kapelus, P.: 2002, ‘Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the ‘community’: the case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi,’ Journal of Business Ethics 39: 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kok, P., van der Wiele, T., McKenna, R. and Brown, A.: 2001, ‘A Corporate Social Responsibility audit within a quality management framework’, Journal of Business Ethics 31: 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Labonne, B.: 2002, ‘Commentary: Harnessing mining for poverty reduction, especially in Africa’, Natural Resources Forum 26: 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D.: 2001, ‘Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’, Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117-127.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Porritt, J.: 2005, ‘Capitalism as if the World Matters’, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reed, B.: 1999, A Path for Evolving Business/Nonprofit Relationships: Expanding the Value Exchange. Unpublished Presentation to Boston College Centre for Corporate Community Relations Dialogue on Cross-Sector Partnerships, February.

  29. Selsky, J.W. and Parker, B.:2005, ‘Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice’, Journal of Management 31(6): 849-873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Snider, J., Hill, R.P. and Martin, D.: 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A view from the world’s most successful firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 48: 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Suchman, M.: 1995, ‘Managing legitimacy; Strategic and institutional approaches’, The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 391-425.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Van der Flier, and Gruis, V.: 2002, ‘The applicability of portfolio analysis in social management’, European Journal of Housing Policy 2(2): 183-202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Van der Veen, P. and G. McMahon: 2007, Strategic Drivers of the Mining Industry: From Enclave Production to Industrial Clusters. Proceedings from the Third International Conference on Sustainable Development Indicators in the Minerals Industry, Milos, Greece.

  34. Warner, M.: 2003, ‘The New Broker. Business Partners for Development’, Overseas Development Institute: London.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Williamson, O.E.: 1975, ‘Markets and hierarchies; Analysis and antitrust implications’, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yaziji, M.: 2004, ‘Turning Gadflies into Allies’, Harvard Business Review 82(2), 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Maria Esteves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esteves, A.M., Barclay, MA. New Approaches to Evaluating the Performance of Corporate–Community Partnerships: A Case Study from the Minerals Sector. J Bus Ethics 103, 189–202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0860-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • cross-sectoral partnerships
  • evaluation
  • mining industry
  • corporate social responsibility
  • social licence