Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 103, Issue 2, pp 189–202 | Cite as

New Approaches to Evaluating the Performance of Corporate–Community Partnerships: A Case Study from the Minerals Sector

  • Ana Maria Esteves
  • Mary-Anne Barclay


A continuing challenge for researchers and practitioners alike is the lack of data on the effectiveness of corporate–community investment programmes. The focus of this article is on the minerals industry, where companies currently face the challenge of matching corporate drivers for strategic partnership with community needs for programmes that contribute to local and regional sustainability. While many global mining companies advocate a strategic approach to partnerships, there is no evidence currently available that suggests companies are monitoring these partnerships to see if they do, in fact, represent ‘strategic’ investments. This article argues that applying the management concept of ‘investment performance’ to corporate–community partnerships requires questioning traditional evaluation methods that focus on the results of programmes or activities. We adopt a case study approach to introduce an evaluation framework that considers performance from both corporate and community perspectives and that conceptualises partnership performance as comprising four aspects: (1) the contribution of the partnership to the overall portfolio of a company’s community investment programmes, (2) the appropriateness of the partnership model, (3) the effectiveness of the partnering relationship and (4) the ability of the partners to achieve programme goals. The application of this evaluation framework to an established corporate–community partnership programme provided some useful insights as to how partnership performance can be improved.


cross-sectoral partnerships evaluation mining industry corporate social responsibility social licence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A., Ganapathi, J.: 2007, ‘Putting the s back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations’, Academy of Management Review Vol. 32 (3): 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B. and Rahman, S. (eds): 2002, ‘Unfolding stakeholder thinking: theory, responsibility and engagement’, Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, M.L.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review Vol. 32 (3): 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, C.: 1975, ‘Up the Hierarchy’, Journal of Extension 13(2): 7-12.Google Scholar
  5. Buchholz, R.A. and Rosenthal, S.B.: 2006, ‘Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1): 137-148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Business Partners for Development: 2002a, Endearing Myths, Enduring Truths: Enabling Partnerships Between Business, the Civil Society and the Public Sector (Knowledge Resource Group, Business Partners for Development, London).Google Scholar
  7. Business Partners for Development: 2002b, Tri-Sector Partnership Results and Recommendations: Putting Partnering to Work (Business Partners for Development, London).Google Scholar
  8. Caplan, K., J. Mugabi and L. Stott: 2006, Turning Partnership Evaluation on Its Head: Considerations for Partnership Practitioners (Draft), (Building Partnerships for Development, London). Retrieved September 7, 2007, from
  9. Carroll, A.B.: 1989, ‘Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management’, Cincinnati: South-West.Google Scholar
  10. Chandra, S.: 2003, ‘Regional Economy Size and the Growth-Instability Frontier: Evidence from Europe’, Journal of Regional Science 43 (1): 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandra, S. and Shadel, W.G.: 2007, ‘Crossing disciplinary boundaries: Applying financial portfolio theory to model the organization of the self-concept’, Journal of Research in Personality 41 (2): 346–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarkson, M.: 1996, ‘Redefining the Corporation: A Stakeholder Perspective’, Policy Options (December), 6–10.Google Scholar
  13. Clarkson, M: 1998, ‘The Corporation and its stakeholders: classic and contemporary readings’, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Covey, J. and L. D. Brown: 2001, Critical Cooperation: An Alternative Form of Civil Society-Business Engagement (Institute for Development Research Reports No. 17(1), London).Google Scholar
  15. Cragg, W. and Greenbaum, A.: 2002, ‘Reasoning about responsibilities: mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed,’ Journal of Business Ethics 39: 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dashwood, H.: 2007, ‘Towards sustainable mining: The corporate role in the construction of global standards’, The Multination Business Review, 15(1): 47-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esteves, A.M.: 2008, ‘Evaluating community investments in the mining sector using multi-criteria decision analysis to integrate SIA with business planning’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28: 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, R.E.: 1984, ‘Strategic management: a stakeholder approach’, Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  19. Goodpaster, K.: 1991, ‘Business ethics and stakeholder analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Googins, B.K. and Rochlin, S.A.: 2000, ‘Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships’, Business and Society Review 105 (1): 127-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunningham, N., Kagan, R.A. and Thornton, D. 2004 ‘Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance’, Law and Social Inquiry 29 (2): 307-341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, T.M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics’, Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 404-37.Google Scholar
  23. Kapelus, P.: 2002, ‘Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the ‘community’: the case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi,’ Journal of Business Ethics 39: 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kok, P., van der Wiele, T., McKenna, R. and Brown, A.: 2001, ‘A Corporate Social Responsibility audit within a quality management framework’, Journal of Business Ethics 31: 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Labonne, B.: 2002, ‘Commentary: Harnessing mining for poverty reduction, especially in Africa’, Natural Resources Forum 26: 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D.: 2001, ‘Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’, Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117-127.Google Scholar
  27. Porritt, J.: 2005, ‘Capitalism as if the World Matters’, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  28. Reed, B.: 1999, A Path for Evolving Business/Nonprofit Relationships: Expanding the Value Exchange. Unpublished Presentation to Boston College Centre for Corporate Community Relations Dialogue on Cross-Sector Partnerships, February.Google Scholar
  29. Selsky, J.W. and Parker, B.:2005, ‘Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice’, Journal of Management 31(6): 849-873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snider, J., Hill, R.P. and Martin, D.: 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A view from the world’s most successful firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 48: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suchman, M.: 1995, ‘Managing legitimacy; Strategic and institutional approaches’, The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 391-425.Google Scholar
  32. Van der Flier, and Gruis, V.: 2002, ‘The applicability of portfolio analysis in social management’, European Journal of Housing Policy 2(2): 183-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van der Veen, P. and G. McMahon: 2007, Strategic Drivers of the Mining Industry: From Enclave Production to Industrial Clusters. Proceedings from the Third International Conference on Sustainable Development Indicators in the Minerals Industry, Milos, Greece.Google Scholar
  34. Warner, M.: 2003, ‘The New Broker. Business Partners for Development’, Overseas Development Institute: London.Google Scholar
  35. Williamson, O.E.: 1975, ‘Markets and hierarchies; Analysis and antitrust implications’, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Yaziji, M.: 2004, ‘Turning Gadflies into Allies’, Harvard Business Review 82(2), 110–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Social Responsibility in MiningUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations