Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 103, Issue 1, pp 73–93 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias

  • Derek DaltonEmail author
  • Marc Ortegren


Gender is one of the most frequently studied variables within the ethics literature. In prior studies that find gender differences, females consistently report more ethical responses than males. However, prior research also indicates that females are more prone to responding in a socially desirable fashion. Consequently, it is uncertain whether gender differences in ethical decision-making exist because females are more ethical or perhaps because females are more prone to the social desirability response bias. Using a sample of 30 scenarios from prior studies that find gender differences, we examine whether these gender differences remain robust once social desirability is controlled for in the analysis. Our data suggest that the effect of gender on ethical decision-making is largely attenuated once social desirability is included in the analysis. In essence, the social desirability response bias appears to be driving a significant portion of the relationship between gender and ethical decision-making. We discuss several important research implications of this study.


gender social desirability response bias ethics research 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alicke, M.D.: 1985, ‘Global Self-Evaluation as Determined by the Desirability and Controllability of Trait Adjectives’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 1621-1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, S.T., D.M. Messick, and G.R. Goethals: 1989, ‘On Being Better but Not Smarter than Others: The Muhammad Ali Effect,’ Social Cognition 7, 275-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ameen, E. C., D. M. Guffey and J. J. McMillan: 1996, ‘Gender Differences in Determining the Ethical Sensitivity of Future Accounting Professionals’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(5), 591–597Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, D.F and L.A. Ponemon: 1991, ‘Internal Auditors’ Perceptions of Whistle-Blowing and the Influence of Moral Reasoning: An Experiment,’ Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (2), 1-15.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, T., K. Bass and G. Brown: 1996, ‘Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer's Wrongdoing’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(11), 1161–1174Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny: 1986, ‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173-1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernardi, R.A. 2006: ‘Associations between Hofstede’s Cultural Constructs and Social Desirability Response Bias’, Journal of Business Ethics 65, 45-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernardi, R. A. and K. L. Adamaitis: 2006, ‘Data Contamination by Social Desirability Response Bias: An International Study of Students’ Cheating Behavior’, Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting 11, 157–184Google Scholar
  9. Bernardi, R.A. and S.T. Guptill: 2008, ‘Social Desirability Response Bias, Gender, and Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment: An International Study,’ Journal of Business Ethics 81, 797-809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernardi, R.A., M.B. Witek, and M.R. Melton: 2009, ‘A Four-Country Study of the Associations Between Bribery and Unethical Actions’, Journal of Business Ethics 84, 389-403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bierbrauer, G.: 1976, ‘Why Did He Do It? Attribution of Obedience and the Phenomenon of Dispositional Bias,’ European Journal of Social Psychology 9, 67-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christie, P.M.J., I.G. Kwon, P.A. Stoeberl, and R. Baumhart: 2003, ‘A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers: India, Korea, and the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics 46 (3), 263-287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chung, J. and G.S. Monroe: 2003, ‘Exploring Social Desirability Bias’, Journal of Business Ethics 44, 291-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cianci, A.M. and S.E. Kaplan: 2010, ‘The Effect of CEO Reputation and Explanations for Poor Performance on Investors’ Judgments About the Company’s Future Performance and Management’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 35, 478-495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J.R., L.W. Pant and D.J. Sharp: 2001, ‘An Examination of Differences in Ethical-Decision Making Between Canadian Business Students and Accounting Professionals’, Journal of Business Ethics 30 (4), 319-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole, B.C. and D.L. Smith: 1996, ‘Perceptions of Business Ethics: Students vs. Business People’, Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8), 889-896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crandall, V.: 1966, ‘Personality Characteristics and Social Achievement Behaviors Associated with Children’s Social Desirability Response Tendencies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, 447–486Google Scholar
  18. Crowne, D.P. and D. Marlowe: 1960, ‘A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology,’ Journal of Consulting Psychology 24, 349-354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawson, L.M.: 1997, ‘Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession’, Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11), 1143-1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deshpande, S.P., J. Joseph, and R. Prasad: 2006, ‘Factors Impacting Ethical Behavior in Hospitals’, Journal of Business Ethics 69: 207-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunning, D. J.A. Meyerowitz, and A.D. Holzberg: 1989, ‘Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability,’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 1082-1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eagley, A.H.: 1987, Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey).Google Scholar
  23. Edwards, A.: 1953, ‘The Relationship Between the Judged Desirability of a Trait and the Probability that the Trait Will be Endorsed’, Journal of Applied Psychology 37, 90-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernandes, M.F. and D.M. Randall: 1992. ‘The Nature of Social Desirability Response Effects in Ethics Research’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 183-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fleischman, G. and S. Valentine: 2003, ‘Professionals’ Tax Liability and Ethical Evaluations in an Equitable Relief Innocent Spouse Case’, Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1), 27-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ford, R.C. and W.D. Richardson: 1994, ‘Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205-221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geiger, M. A. and B. T. O'Connell: 2000, ‘An Examination of Using Surrogate Measures to Assess Social Desirability Response Bias’, Research in Accounting Ethics 6, 107–120Google Scholar
  28. Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
  29. Glover, S.H., M.A. Bumpus, J.E. Logan and J.R. Ciesla: 1997, ‘Re-Examining the Influence of Indivdidual Values on Ethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(12), 1319-1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goethals, G. R.: 1986, Fabricating and Ignoring Social Reality: Self-Serving Estimates of Consensus. In: J. Suls, T.A. Will (eds.), Social Comparison and Relative Deprivation: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 4. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 135-157Google Scholar
  31. G.R. Goethals, D.M. Messick, S.T. Allison (1991) The Uniqueness Bias: Studies of Constructive Social Comparison. In J. Suls and T.A. Will (eds.), Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research, Vol. 15. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 149-176Google Scholar
  32. Groves, G.M.: 1989, Survey Errors and Survey Costs (Wiley, New York, NY).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Libby, B. and V. Agnello: 2000, ‘Ethical Decision Making and the Law’, Journal of Business Ethics 26 (3), 223-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loe, T.W., L. Ferrell, and P. Mansfield: 2000. ‘A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 25, 185-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lopez, T.J., S.D. Vandervelde, and Y. Wu: 2009. ‘Investor Perceptions of an Auditor’s Adverse Internal Control Opinion’, The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28, 231-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malinowski, C. and K.A. Berger: 1996, ‘Undergraduate Student Attitudes About Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(5), 525-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mason, E.S and P.E. Mudrack: 1996, ‘Gender and Ethical Orientation: A Test of Gender and Occupational Socialization Theories’, Journal of Business Ethics 15: 599-604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mensch, B.S., D.B. Kandel. 1988. Underreporting of Substance Use in a National Longitudinal Youth Cohort. Public Opinion Quarterly 25(1): 100-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moorman, R.H. and P.M. Podsakoff: 1992, ‘A Meta-Analytic Review and Empirical Test of the Potential Confounding Effects of Social Desirability Response Sets in Organizational Behaviour Research’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 65, 131-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nyaw, M.K. and I. Ng: 1994, ‘A Comparative Analysis of Ethical Beliefs: A Four Country Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 13: 543-555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Fallon, M.J. and K.D. Butterfield: 2005, ‘A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996-2003’, Journal of Business Ethics 59: 375-413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Okleshen, M. and R. Hoyt: 1996, ‘A Cross Cultural Comparison of Ethical Perspectives and Decision Approaches of Business Students: United States of America Versus New Zealand’, Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5), 537-549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paulhus, D.L.: 1984. ‘Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 598-609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paulhus, D.L.: 1986, ‘Self-Deception and Impression Management in Test Responses’, in A. Angleiter and J.S. Wiggins (eds), Personality Assessment Via Questionnaire: Current Issues in Theory and Measurement (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Google Scholar
  45. Paulhus, D. L.: 1991, ‘Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR)’, in J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver and L. S. Wrightsman (eds.), Measures of Personality and Psychological Attitudes, Vol. 1 (Academic Press, New York), pp. 37–41Google Scholar
  46. Peltier, B.D., J.A. Walsh: 1990, An Investigation of Response Bias in the Chapman Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 50(1), 803-815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Randall, D.M. and M.F. Fernandes: 1991, ‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 805-817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Randall, D.M. and A.M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6), 457-472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rest, J.: 1986, Moral Development Advance in Research and Theory. (Praeger, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  50. Ross, W.T. and D.C. Robertson: 2003, ‘A Typology of Situational Factors: Impact of Salesperson Decision-Making About Ethical Issues’, Journal of Business Ethics, 46 (3), 213-234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schoderbek, P.P. and S.P. Deshpande: 1996, ‘Impression Management, Overclaiming, and Perceived Unethical Conduct: The Role of Male and Female Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 409-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schultz, J.J., D.A. Johnson, D. Morris, and S. Dyrnes: 1993, ‘An Investigation of the Reporting of Questionable Acts in an International Setting,’ Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Supplement), 75-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singhapakdi, A.: 1999, ‘Perceived Importance of Ethics and Ethical Decisions in Marketing’, Journal of Business Research 45, 89-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, P.L., and E.F. Oakley, III.: 1997, ‘Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 37-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weber, J.: 1992, ‘Scenarios in Business Ethics Research: Review, Critical Assessment, and Recommendations’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 2 (2), 137-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weeks, W. A., C. W. Moore, J. A. McKinney and J. G. Longenecker: 1999, ‘The Effects of Gender and Career Stage on Ethical Judgment’, Journal of Business Ethics 20(4), 301–313Google Scholar
  57. Zerbe, W.J. and D.L. Paulhus: 1987, ‘Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception’, Academy of Management Journal 12 (2), 250-264.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business and Behavioral SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonU.S.A.
  2. 2.Robert Morris UniversityPittsburghU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations