Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 97–118 | Cite as

A Framework for Assessing Immorally Manipulative Marketing Tactics

  • Shlomo Sher
Article

Abstract

A longstanding debate exists in both academic literature and popular culture about whether non-informative marketing tactics are manipulative. However, given that we tend to believe that some marketing tactics are manipulative and some are not, the question that marketers, their critics, and consumers need to ask themselves is that of how to actually determine whether any particular marketing tactic is manipulative and whether a given manipulative tactic is, in fact, immoral. This article proposes to operationalize criteria that can be used by marketers for making such determinations and attempts to provide some clarification toward our under- standing of the concept of manipulation and the conditions for the moral acceptability of manipulative marketing practices. It argues that a marketing tactic is manipulative if it is intended to motivate by undermining what the marketer believes is his/her audience’s normal decision-making process either by deception or by playing on a vulnerability that the marketer believes exists in his/her audience’s normal decision-making process. Such a tactic is morally objectionable on several grounds, which make it morally impermissible unless outweighed by sufficient “redemptive” moral considerations.

Keywords

deception ethical decision-making exploitation manipulation marketing ethics moral framework 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrington, R. L.: 1982, ‘Advertising and Behavior Control’, Journal of Business Ethics 1(1), 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, S. and Martinson, D.L.: 2001, ‘The TARES Test: Five Principles for Ethical Persuasion’, Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16(2), 148-175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carson T. L.: 1988, ‘On the Definition of Lying: A Reply to Jones and Revisions’ Journal of Business Ethics 7(7), 509-514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson, T. L., R. E. Wokutch and K. F. Murrmann: 1982, ‘Bluffing in Labor Negotiations: Legal and Ethical Issues’, Journal of Business Ethics 1(1), 13-22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crisp, R.: 1987, ‘Persuasive Advertising, Autonomy, and the Creation of Desire’, Journal of Business Ethics 6(5), 413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunningham, A.: 2003, ‘Autonomous Consumption: Buying into the Ideology of Capitalism’, Journal of Business Ethics 48(3), 229-236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durham, T.R.: 1984, ‘Information, Persuasion, and Control in Moral Appraisal of Advertising Strategy’, Journal of Business Ethics 3(3), 173-180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emamalizadeh, H.: 1985, ‘The Informative and Persuasive Functions of Advertising: A Comment’’, Journal of Business Ethics. 4, 151-153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Federal Trade Commission: June 3, 2004, ‘KFC’s Claims that Fried Chicken is a Way to “Eat Better” Don’t Fly’, http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/06/kfccorp.shtm.
  10. Gardner, D. M.: 1975, ‘Deception in Advertising: A Conceptual Approach’, The Journal of Marketing 39(1), 40-46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gogoi, P.: October 9, 2006, ‘Wal-Mart’s Jim and Laura: The Real Story’ Businessweek.com. http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/oct2006/db20061009_579137.htm.
  12. Greenspan, P.: 2003, ‘The Problem with Manipulation’, American Philosophical Quarterly 40(2), 155-164Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, S.D.: 1976, ‘Informational vs. Persuasive Advertising: An Appraisal’, Journal of Advertising 5(3), 5-8Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, S.D. and Vitell, S. J.: 2006, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Revision and Three Questions’, Journal of Macromarketing 26(2), 143-153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, G. E.: 1986, ‘Lying and Intentions’, Journal of Business Ethics 5(4), 347-349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyers-Levy, J. and Malaviya, P.: 1999, ‘Consumer’s Processing of Persuasive Advertisements: An Integrative Framework of Persuasion Theories’, Journal of Marketing 63, 45-60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Public Radio: March 6, 2008, ‘Airborne Settles Suit over False Claims’, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87937907.
  18. Phillips, M. J.: 1997, Ethics and Manipulation in Advertising: Answering a Flawed Indictment (Quorum Books, Westport, CT)Google Scholar
  19. Rudinow, J.: 1978, ‘Manipulation’, Ethics 88(4), 338-347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Santilli, P.C.: 1983, ‘The Informative and Persuasive Functions of Advertising: A Moral Appraisal’, Journal of Business Ethics 2(1), 27-33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shabbir, H. and Thwaites, D.: 2007, ‘The Use of Humor to Mask Deceptive Ads: It’s No Laughing Matter’, Journal of Advertising 36(2), 75-85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shaver, D.: 2003, ‘Toward an Analytical Structure for Evaluating the Ethical Content of Decisions by Advertising Professionals’, Journal of Business Ethics 48(3), 291-300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shin, A.: December 12, 2006, ‘FTC Moves to Unmask Word-of-Mouth Marketing’, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/11/AR2006121101389.html.
  24. Sneddon, A.: 2001, ‘Advertising and Deep Autonomy’, Journal of Business Ethics 33(1), 15-28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Valdman, M.: 2009, ‘A Theory of Wrongful Exploitation’, Philosopher’s Imprint 9(6), 1–14.Google Scholar
  26. Waide, J.: 1987, ‘The Making of Self and World in Advertising’, Journal of Business Ethics 6(2), 73-79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood, A.: 1995 ‘Exploitation’, Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation 12(2), 136-158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USC Levan Institute for Humanities and EthicsLos AngelesU.S.A.
  2. 2.Los AngelesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations