Skip to main content
Log in

Partnership Formation for Change: Indicators for Transformative Potential in Cross Sector Social Partnerships

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide a grounded model for analysing formation in cross sector social partnerships to understand why business and nonprofit organizations increasingly partner to address social issues. Our model introduces organizational characteristics, organizational motives and history of partner interactions as critical factors that indicate the potential for social change. We argue that organizational characteristics, motives and the history of interactions indicate transformative capacity, transformative intention and transformative experience, respectively. Together, these three factors consist of a framework that aids early detection of unnecessary partnering efforts and provide indicators of partners’ transformative potential. Further we discuss the reciprocal, multi-level nature of change in social partnerships through the interplay between the organizational, individual and social levels of reality. The formation stage of partnerships contributes to the partnership and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures a deep understanding of the organisations’ early interactions by placing within a historical context that reveals their dynamics and their potential to deliver organisational and social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsop, R. J., 2004. The 18 immutable laws of corporate reputation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, M., E. Binkley, J. Bivens, P. Highers, C. Poole and P. Walker: 1990, ‘Case-Based Instruction and Learning: An Interdisciplinary Project’, Proceedings of 34th Annual Conference: 2–18, College Reading Association. Reprint.

  • Aquilera, R. V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C. A. And Ganapathi, I., 2007. Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., 2000. The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M., F. Gaetani, J. C. Cortazar-Velarde and G. Cejudo: 2001, ‘Research on Public Management Policy Change in the Latin American Region: Conceptual Framework, Methodological Guide, and Exemplars’, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/MES/pdf/IADBMethodGuide.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2002.

  • Basler, D. and J. Carmin: 2002, ‘The Interpretive Basis of Action: Identity and Tactics in Environmental Movement Organizations’, Academy of Management Proceedings 2002. Best Paper Index, pp. B1–B6.

  • Bendell, J., 2000a. Civil Regulation: A new form of democratic governance for the global economy? In: Bendell, J. (ed) Terms of Endearment, Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendell, J., 2000. Working with Stakeholder pressure for sustainable development.In: J. Bendell (Ed). Terms of Endearment. Business, NGOs and Sustainable. Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H. and Drumwright, M.E., 2004. Social alliances: Company/Nonprofit Collaboration. California Management Review, 47 (1): 58-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, R. and T. Taillieu: 2004, ‘Multi-Party Collaboration as Social Learning for Interdependence: Developing Relational Knowing for Sustainable Natural Resource Management’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14, 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann, J. and C. K. Prahalad: 2007, ‘Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact’, Harvard Business Review February, 1–13.

  • Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby and M. Middleton Stone: 2006, ‘The Design and Implementation of Cross- Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature’, Public Administration Review 66: 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J., M., Gibbons, M. J., and Shaye, G., 2001. Enterprise Schemes for Nonprofit Survival, Growth and Effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3): 271-288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, J. and Cook J. 2008, Stakeholder dialogue and organisational learning: Changing relationships between companies and NGOs. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17 (1): 35-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C&E: 2010, ‘Corporate–NGO Partnership Barometer’, Summary Report 2010, http://www.candeadvisory.com/projects/report. Accessed Oct 2010.

  • Carmin, J. and Basler, D., 2002. Selecting Repertoires of Action in Environmental Movement Organisations. Organization & Environment 15(4): 365-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, T.: 2006, ‘Just Say No to NGOs’, National Post April 1.

  • Crane, A. 1998. Exploring Green Alliances Organization & Environment,. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6): 559-579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Anheier, H. K. 1990. The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 137-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P. and Teegen, H., 2002. Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: theory and implications. International Business Review, 11:665-684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreiling, M. and Wolf, B., (2001). Environmental Movement Organisations and Political Strategy. Tactical Conflicts over NAFTA. 14(1): 34-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earthwatch: 2002, ‘Implementing Corporate Environmental Responsibility’, Directory of Members of the Corporate Environmental Responsibility Group 2002–3003, Bulletin No. 20. Earthwatch, Oxford.

  • Earthwatch: 2003, ‘Building Bridges. Making Connections to a Sustainable Future, 2003’, Annual Report. Earthwatch, Oxford.

  • Earthwatch: 2004a, ‘Corporate Programmes@Earthwatch Institute’, Earthwatch Website, http://www.earthwatch.org/corporate/. Accessed 3 July 2004.

  • Earthwatch: 2004b, ‘Earthwatch’s Mission’, Earthwatch Website, http://www.earthwatch.org/europe/aboutus.html. Accessed 3 July 2004.

  • Earthwatch Annual Report 2001.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabig, H. and Boele, R., 1999. The Changing Nature of NGO activity in a globalizing world: Pushing the Corporate Responsibility Agenda. IDS Bulletin, 30:58-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishel, D., 1993. The Arts Sponsorship Handbook. London: Directory of Social Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U., 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative research. London, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • FTSE4GOOD: 2006, ‘FTSE4GOOD Index Series’, Inclusion Criteria. FTSE The Index Company, London. http://www.ftse.com/Indices/FTSE4Good_Index_Series/Downloads/FTSE4Good_Inclusion_Criteria_Brochure_Feb_06.pdf. Accessed July 2006.

  • Googins, B. K., & Rochlin, S. A., 2000. Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105: 127-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap, S.: 1998, ‘NGOs and the Private Sector: Potential for Partnerships?’, INTRAC Occasional Papers Series Number 27. Intrac Publications, Oxford.

  • Holzer, B.: 2001, ‘Translational Subpolitics and Corporate Discourse: A Study of Environmental Protest and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Sociology, London School of Economics.

  • Huxham, C., 1993. Pursuing Collaborative Advantage. The journal of Operational Research Society, 44(6) : 599-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. and S. Vangen: 1996, ‘Working Together. Key Themes in the Management of Relationships Between Public and Non-Profit Organizations’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 9(7), 5–17.

  • Huxham, C. and MacDonald, D., 1992. Introducing Collaborative Advantage: Achieving Inter-Organizational Effectiveness through Meta-strategy. Management Decision, 30(3): 50-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2000. Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1159-1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, E., 2003. Theory of alliances: Partnerships and partner characteristics. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1):41-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. and T. Keshishian: 2009, ‘Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships between Businesses and NGOs in the Context of CSR’, Journal of Business Ethics 84(1), 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1999, ‘From Spare Change to Real Change – The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation’, Harvard Business Review May–June, 122–132.

  • Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R. & Kostwinder, E. (2008). Partnerships for development. European Management Journal, 26, (4), 262-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D C., 1990 Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global Agenda, West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, M. P. and A. Y. Lewin: 1998, ‘The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances’, Organization Science 9(3), 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. & Hardy, C. 1999. Building bridges for refugees: Toward a typology of bridging organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1): 48-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Ber, M.J. and Branzei, O., 2009. (Re) Forming Strategic Cross-Sector Partnerships Relational Processes of Social Innovation. Business & Society. 49 (1): 140-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A. (2008), Managing Market Relationships: Methodological and Empirical Insights. Gower Publishing, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, F. J. and Arnold, M. B., 1995. The Power of Environmental Partnership. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald S. and Piekkari, R., 2005. Out of control: personal networks in European collaboration. R&D Management, 35, 4: 441-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., 2000. Breaking the Code of Change. Observations and Critique. In: Beer, M., and N. Nohria (Eds.) Breaking the Code of Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., and Moon, J., 2008. Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. 1983. Design guidelines for social problem solving interventions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(2): 177-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan, F. W.: 1999, ‘Working on Nonprofit Boards: Don’t Assume the Shoe Fits’, Harvard Business Review November–December, 65–80.

  • McKelvey, B.: 1997, ‘Perspective—Quasi-Natural Organization Science’, Organization Science 8(4), 351–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S., and Stephen, W. J. D., 1966. Spatial Relationships in Flocks of Sandhill Cranes (Grus Canadensis). Ecology, Vol. 47 (2): 323-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne G. R., Iyer E. S., Gooding Williams S. (1996) Environmental Organization Alliance relationships within and across nonprofit business and government sectors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 15(2): 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuhashi, H. and Greve, H., 2009. A Matching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (5): 975 – 995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortished, C.: 2003, ‘Miner May Have Dug Itself into a Hole’, The Times, p. 23.

  • Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Phillips, N. and Zyglidopoulos, S. 1997. The evolution of corporate social responsiveness: An exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business & Society, 36(3): 296-322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C., 1990. Determinants of interorganisational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15(2): 241-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. E., and Johnston, H., 2000. What a Good Idea: Frames and Ideologies in Social Movement Research. Mobilization: An International Journal, 5: 37-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, S. M., 1995. Strategic Management for Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, S.: 2001, ‘Thirst for Justice’, The Guardian July 11, p. 8.

  • Pettigrew, A.: 1985, ‘Contextualist Research and the Study of Organisational Change Process’, in: E. Mumford, R. Hirscheim, G. Fitzgerald and T. Wood-Harper (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 Colloquium, Manchester, UK, 1–3 Sept 1984 (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland).

  • Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., 2004. The Risk Management of Everything. A Demos Publication. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1991) Issues and alternatives in comparative social research. Leiden, The Netherlands; New York: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rio Tinto: Review, Dec 2002.

  • Rondinelli,, D. A. and London, T., 2003. How Corporations and Environmental Groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1): 61-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. and Alwin, D., 1998. Retrospective versus prospective measurement of life histories in longitudinal research. In Giele, J.Z. & Elder Jr., G.H. Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi M.M. (2008) Adaptive Responsibilities: Non-Linear Interactions Across Social Sectors. Cases from Cross Sector Social Partnerships. Emergence: Complexity & Organization E:CO Journal 10 (3): 51-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M.M., 2010. The Politics of Partnerships. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A., (2009) Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics 85: 413-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Ryan, A., 2007. Forms of corporate community involvement: From partnerships to philanthropy. A critical review. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12: 247-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J.W. and Parker, B.: 2005, ‘Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice’, Journal of Management, 31(6): 1-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, B. and A. J. Hillman: 2000, ‘The Development of Business-Government Strategies by Diversified Firms’, Strategic Management Journal 21(2), 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., 2005. Expanding the Frontier of Global Knowledge: Introduction. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change 2(1):3-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Ring, P. and A. H. van de Ven: 1994, ‘Development Processes Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships’, Academy of Management Review 19(1), 90–118.

  • Stafford, E. R. and Hartman C. L., 2000. Environmentalist-Business Collaborations: Social Responsibility, Green Alliances, and Beyond, in Advertising Research: The Internet, Consumer Behavior, and Strategy, G. Zinkhan, (Ed.), Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 170-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S., 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 463-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, S. and L. D. Brown: 1997, Fostering Inter- sectoral Partnering: A Guide to Promoting Cooperation Among Governement, Business and Civil Society Actors. IDR Reports 13(3). Available from: http://www.commdev.org/content/document/detail/1305/.

  • Waddock, S.: 1989, ‘Understanding Social Partnerships. An Evolutionary Model of Partnership Organisations’, Administration & Society, 21(1): 78-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A.: 1991, ‘A Typology of Social Partnership Organizations’, Administration and Society 22(4), 480–515.

  • Warner, M. and R. Sullivan: 2004, Putting Partnerships to Work: Strategic Alliances for Development between Government and Private Sector and Civil Society (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield).

  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L.K. and Cochran, P.L., 1999. Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices. Academy of Management Review, 42:539-552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A., (1998) Institutional Form and Organisational Behavior. In: W. W. Powell and S. Clemens (eds) Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven CT: Yale University Press pp. 69-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F. and H. Vredenburg: 1997, ‘Interorganisational Collaboration and the Preservation of Global Biodiversity’, Organisation Science 8(4), 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.J., 1991. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W. W. Jr and Samu, S, 2003. Dimensions of Business and Nonprofit Collaborative Relationships. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 11(1): 3-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R., 1999. Nonprofit Management Studies in the United States: Current Developments and Future Prospects. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(1): 13-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. and George G., 2002. Absorptive Capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 185-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria May Seitanidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seitanidi, M.M., Koufopoulos, D.N. & Palmer, P. Partnership Formation for Change: Indicators for Transformative Potential in Cross Sector Social Partnerships. J Bus Ethics 94 (Suppl 1), 139–161 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0784-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0784-2

Keywords

Navigation