Partnership Formation for Change: Indicators for Transformative Potential in Cross Sector Social Partnerships
- 1.4k Downloads
We provide a grounded model for analysing formation in cross sector social partnerships to understand why business and nonprofit organizations increasingly partner to address social issues. Our model introduces organizational characteristics, organizational motives and history of partner interactions as critical factors that indicate the potential for social change. We argue that organizational characteristics, motives and the history of interactions indicate transformative capacity, transformative intention and transformative experience, respectively. Together, these three factors consist of a framework that aids early detection of unnecessary partnering efforts and provide indicators of partners’ transformative potential. Further we discuss the reciprocal, multi-level nature of change in social partnerships through the interplay between the organizational, individual and social levels of reality. The formation stage of partnerships contributes to the partnership and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures a deep understanding of the organisations’ early interactions by placing within a historical context that reveals their dynamics and their potential to deliver organisational and social change.
Keywordspartnerships corporate social responsibility NGO formation motives longitudinal cross sector social interactions organisational characteristics change
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alsop, R. J., 2004. The 18 immutable laws of corporate reputation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Alvarez, M., E. Binkley, J. Bivens, P. Highers, C. Poole and P. Walker: 1990, ‘Case-Based Instruction and Learning: An Interdisciplinary Project’, Proceedings of 34th Annual Conference: 2–18, College Reading Association. Reprint.Google Scholar
- Aquilera, R. V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C. A. And Ganapathi, I., 2007. Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.Google Scholar
- Austin, J. E., 2000. The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Barzelay, M., F. Gaetani, J. C. Cortazar-Velarde and G. Cejudo: 2001, ‘Research on Public Management Policy Change in the Latin American Region: Conceptual Framework, Methodological Guide, and Exemplars’, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/MES/pdf/IADBMethodGuide.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2002.
- Basler, D. and J. Carmin: 2002, ‘The Interpretive Basis of Action: Identity and Tactics in Environmental Movement Organizations’, Academy of Management Proceedings 2002. Best Paper Index, pp. B1–B6.Google Scholar
- Bendell, J., 2000a. Civil Regulation: A new form of democratic governance for the global economy? In: Bendell, J. (ed) Terms of Endearment, Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bendell, J., 2000. Working with Stakeholder pressure for sustainable development.In: J. Bendell (Ed). Terms of Endearment. Business, NGOs and Sustainable. Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
- Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H. and Drumwright, M.E., 2004. Social alliances: Company/Nonprofit Collaboration. California Management Review, 47 (1): 58-90.Google Scholar
- Bouwen, R. and T. Taillieu: 2004, ‘Multi-Party Collaboration as Social Learning for Interdependence: Developing Relational Knowing for Sustainable Natural Resource Management’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14, 137–153.Google Scholar
- Brugmann, J. and C. K. Prahalad: 2007, ‘Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact’, Harvard Business Review February, 1–13.Google Scholar
- C&E: 2010, ‘Corporate–NGO Partnership Barometer’, Summary Report 2010, http://www.candeadvisory.com/projects/report. Accessed Oct 2010.
- Corcoran, T.: 2006, ‘Just Say No to NGOs’, National Post April 1.Google Scholar
- Dreiling, M. and Wolf, B., (2001). Environmental Movement Organisations and Political Strategy. Tactical Conflicts over NAFTA. 14(1): 34-54.Google Scholar
- Earthwatch: 2002, ‘Implementing Corporate Environmental Responsibility’, Directory of Members of the Corporate Environmental Responsibility Group 2002–3003, Bulletin No. 20. Earthwatch, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Earthwatch: 2003, ‘Building Bridges. Making Connections to a Sustainable Future, 2003’, Annual Report. Earthwatch, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Earthwatch: 2004a, ‘Corporate Programmes@Earthwatch Institute’, Earthwatch Website, http://www.earthwatch.org/corporate/. Accessed 3 July 2004.
- Earthwatch: 2004b, ‘Earthwatch’s Mission’, Earthwatch Website, http://www.earthwatch.org/europe/aboutus.html. Accessed 3 July 2004.
- Earthwatch Annual Report 2001.Google Scholar
- Fishel, D., 1993. The Arts Sponsorship Handbook. London: Directory of Social Change.Google Scholar
- Flick, U., 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative research. London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- FTSE4GOOD: 2006, ‘FTSE4GOOD Index Series’, Inclusion Criteria. FTSE The Index Company, London. http://www.ftse.com/Indices/FTSE4Good_Index_Series/Downloads/FTSE4Good_Inclusion_Criteria_Brochure_Feb_06.pdf. Accessed July 2006.
- Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.Google Scholar
- Heap, S.: 1998, ‘NGOs and the Private Sector: Potential for Partnerships?’, INTRAC Occasional Papers Series Number 27. Intrac Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Holzer, B.: 2001, ‘Translational Subpolitics and Corporate Discourse: A Study of Environmental Protest and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Sociology, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Huxham, C., 1993. Pursuing Collaborative Advantage. The journal of Operational Research Society, 44(6) : 599-611.Google Scholar
- Huxham, C. and S. Vangen: 1996, ‘Working Together. Key Themes in the Management of Relationships Between Public and Non-Profit Organizations’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 9(7), 5–17.Google Scholar
- Jamali, D. and T. Keshishian: 2009, ‘Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships between Businesses and NGOs in the Context of CSR’, Journal of Business Ethics 84(1), 277–295.Google Scholar
- Kanter, R. M.: 1999, ‘From Spare Change to Real Change – The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation’, Harvard Business Review May–June, 122–132.Google Scholar
- Korten, D C., 1990 Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global Agenda, West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
- Koza, M. P. and A. Y. Lewin: 1998, ‘The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances’, Organization Science 9(3), 255–263.Google Scholar
- Lindgreen, A. (2008), Managing Market Relationships: Methodological and Empirical Insights. Gower Publishing, Aldershot.Google Scholar
- Long, F. J. and Arnold, M. B., 1995. The Power of Environmental Partnership. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
- Martin, R., 2000. Breaking the Code of Change. Observations and Critique. In: Beer, M., and N. Nohria (Eds.) Breaking the Code of Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Matten, D., and Moon, J., 2008. Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404-424.Google Scholar
- McFarlan, F. W.: 1999, ‘Working on Nonprofit Boards: Don’t Assume the Shoe Fits’, Harvard Business Review November–December, 65–80.Google Scholar
- McKelvey, B.: 1997, ‘Perspective—Quasi-Natural Organization Science’, Organization Science 8(4), 351–380.Google Scholar
- Milne G. R., Iyer E. S., Gooding Williams S. (1996) Environmental Organization Alliance relationships within and across nonprofit business and government sectors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 15(2): 203–215.Google Scholar
- Mitsuhashi, H. and Greve, H., 2009. A Matching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (5): 975 – 995.Google Scholar
- Mortished, C.: 2003, ‘Miner May Have Dug Itself into a Hole’, The Times, p. 23.Google Scholar
- Oliver, P. E., and Johnston, H., 2000. What a Good Idea: Frames and Ideologies in Social Movement Research. Mobilization: An International Journal, 5: 37-54.Google Scholar
- Oster, S. M., 1995. Strategic Management for Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Parkin, S.: 2001, ‘Thirst for Justice’, The Guardian July 11, p. 8.Google Scholar
- Pettigrew, A.: 1985, ‘Contextualist Research and the Study of Organisational Change Process’, in: E. Mumford, R. Hirscheim, G. Fitzgerald and T. Wood-Harper (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 Colloquium, Manchester, UK, 1–3 Sept 1984 (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland).Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Power, M., 2004. The Risk Management of Everything. A Demos Publication. London: Demos.Google Scholar
- Ragin, C. C. (1991) Issues and alternatives in comparative social research. Leiden, The Netherlands; New York: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
- Rio Tinto: Review, Dec 2002.Google Scholar
- Rondinelli,, D. A. and London, T., 2003. How Corporations and Environmental Groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1): 61-76.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. and Alwin, D., 1998. Retrospective versus prospective measurement of life histories in longitudinal research. In Giele, J.Z. & Elder Jr., G.H. Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Seitanidi M.M. (2008) Adaptive Responsibilities: Non-Linear Interactions Across Social Sectors. Cases from Cross Sector Social Partnerships. Emergence: Complexity & Organization E:CO Journal 10 (3): 51-64.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, B. and A. J. Hillman: 2000, ‘The Development of Business-Government Strategies by Diversified Firms’, Strategic Management Journal 21(2), 175–190.Google Scholar
- Smith Ring, P. and A. H. van de Ven: 1994, ‘Development Processes Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships’, Academy of Management Review 19(1), 90–118.Google Scholar
- Stafford, E. R. and Hartman C. L., 2000. Environmentalist-Business Collaborations: Social Responsibility, Green Alliances, and Beyond, in Advertising Research: The Internet, Consumer Behavior, and Strategy, G. Zinkhan, (Ed.), Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 170-192.Google Scholar
- Waddell, S. and L. D. Brown: 1997, Fostering Inter- sectoral Partnering: A Guide to Promoting Cooperation Among Governement, Business and Civil Society Actors. IDR Reports 13(3). Available from: http://www.commdev.org/content/document/detail/1305/.
- Waddock, S. A.: 1991, ‘A Typology of Social Partnership Organizations’, Administration and Society 22(4), 480–515.Google Scholar
- Warner, M. and R. Sullivan: 2004, Putting Partnerships to Work: Strategic Alliances for Development between Government and Private Sector and Civil Society (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield).Google Scholar
- Weisbrod, B. A., (1998) Institutional Form and Organisational Behavior. In: W. W. Powell and S. Clemens (eds) Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven CT: Yale University Press pp. 69-84.Google Scholar
- Westley, F. and H. Vredenburg: 1997, ‘Interorganisational Collaboration and the Preservation of Global Biodiversity’, Organisation Science 8(4), 381–403.Google Scholar
- Young, D. R., 1999. Nonprofit Management Studies in the United States: Current Developments and Future Prospects. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(1): 13-23.Google Scholar