Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 94, Supplement 1, pp 139–161 | Cite as

Partnership Formation for Change: Indicators for Transformative Potential in Cross Sector Social Partnerships

  • Maria May SeitanidiEmail author
  • Dimitrios N. Koufopoulos
  • Paul Palmer
Article

Abstract

We provide a grounded model for analysing formation in cross sector social partnerships to understand why business and nonprofit organizations increasingly partner to address social issues. Our model introduces organizational characteristics, organizational motives and history of partner interactions as critical factors that indicate the potential for social change. We argue that organizational characteristics, motives and the history of interactions indicate transformative capacity, transformative intention and transformative experience, respectively. Together, these three factors consist of a framework that aids early detection of unnecessary partnering efforts and provide indicators of partners’ transformative potential. Further we discuss the reciprocal, multi-level nature of change in social partnerships through the interplay between the organizational, individual and social levels of reality. The formation stage of partnerships contributes to the partnership and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures a deep understanding of the organisations’ early interactions by placing within a historical context that reveals their dynamics and their potential to deliver organisational and social change.

Keywords

partnerships corporate social responsibility NGO formation motives longitudinal cross sector social interactions organisational characteristics change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsop, R. J., 2004. The 18 immutable laws of corporate reputation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, M., E. Binkley, J. Bivens, P. Highers, C. Poole and P. Walker: 1990, ‘Case-Based Instruction and Learning: An Interdisciplinary Project’, Proceedings of 34th Annual Conference: 2–18, College Reading Association. Reprint.Google Scholar
  3. Aquilera, R. V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C. A. And Ganapathi, I., 2007. Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, J. E., 2000. The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Barzelay, M., F. Gaetani, J. C. Cortazar-Velarde and G. Cejudo: 2001, ‘Research on Public Management Policy Change in the Latin American Region: Conceptual Framework, Methodological Guide, and Exemplars’, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/MES/pdf/IADBMethodGuide.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2002.
  6. Basler, D. and J. Carmin: 2002, ‘The Interpretive Basis of Action: Identity and Tactics in Environmental Movement Organizations’, Academy of Management Proceedings 2002. Best Paper Index, pp. B1–B6.Google Scholar
  7. Bendell, J., 2000a. Civil Regulation: A new form of democratic governance for the global economy? In: Bendell, J. (ed) Terms of Endearment, Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Bendell, J., 2000. Working with Stakeholder pressure for sustainable development.In: J. Bendell (Ed). Terms of Endearment. Business, NGOs and Sustainable. Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H. and Drumwright, M.E., 2004. Social alliances: Company/Nonprofit Collaboration. California Management Review, 47 (1): 58-90.Google Scholar
  10. Bouwen, R. and T. Taillieu: 2004, ‘Multi-Party Collaboration as Social Learning for Interdependence: Developing Relational Knowing for Sustainable Natural Resource Management’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14, 137–153.Google Scholar
  11. Brugmann, J. and C. K. Prahalad: 2007, ‘Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact’, Harvard Business Review February, 1–13.Google Scholar
  12. Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby and M. Middleton Stone: 2006, ‘The Design and Implementation of Cross- Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature’, Public Administration Review 66: 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryson, J., M., Gibbons, M. J., and Shaye, G., 2001. Enterprise Schemes for Nonprofit Survival, Growth and Effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3): 271-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burchell, J. and Cook J. 2008, Stakeholder dialogue and organisational learning: Changing relationships between companies and NGOs. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17 (1): 35-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. C&E: 2010, ‘Corporate–NGO Partnership Barometer’, Summary Report 2010, http://www.candeadvisory.com/projects/report. Accessed Oct 2010.
  16. Carmin, J. and Basler, D., 2002. Selecting Repertoires of Action in Environmental Movement Organisations. Organization & Environment 15(4): 365-388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corcoran, T.: 2006, ‘Just Say No to NGOs’, National Post April 1.Google Scholar
  18. Crane, A. 1998. Exploring Green Alliances Organization & Environment,. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6): 559-579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P. J., & Anheier, H. K. 1990. The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 137-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doh, J. P. and Teegen, H., 2002. Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: theory and implications. International Business Review, 11:665-684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dreiling, M. and Wolf, B., (2001). Environmental Movement Organisations and Political Strategy. Tactical Conflicts over NAFTA. 14(1): 34-54.Google Scholar
  22. Earthwatch: 2002, ‘Implementing Corporate Environmental Responsibility’, Directory of Members of the Corporate Environmental Responsibility Group 2002–3003, Bulletin No. 20. Earthwatch, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Earthwatch: 2003, ‘Building Bridges. Making Connections to a Sustainable Future, 2003’, Annual Report. Earthwatch, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Earthwatch: 2004a, ‘Corporate Programmes@Earthwatch Institute’, Earthwatch Website, http://www.earthwatch.org/corporate/. Accessed 3 July 2004.
  25. Earthwatch: 2004b, ‘Earthwatch’s Mission’, Earthwatch Website, http://www.earthwatch.org/europe/aboutus.html. Accessed 3 July 2004.
  26. Earthwatch Annual Report 2001.Google Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fabig, H. and Boele, R., 1999. The Changing Nature of NGO activity in a globalizing world: Pushing the Corporate Responsibility Agenda. IDS Bulletin, 30:58-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fishel, D., 1993. The Arts Sponsorship Handbook. London: Directory of Social Change.Google Scholar
  31. Flick, U., 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative research. London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. FTSE4GOOD: 2006, ‘FTSE4GOOD Index Series’, Inclusion Criteria. FTSE The Index Company, London. http://www.ftse.com/Indices/FTSE4Good_Index_Series/Downloads/FTSE4Good_Inclusion_Criteria_Brochure_Feb_06.pdf. Accessed July 2006.
  33. Googins, B. K., & Rochlin, S. A., 2000. Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105: 127-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.Google Scholar
  35. Heap, S.: 1998, ‘NGOs and the Private Sector: Potential for Partnerships?’, INTRAC Occasional Papers Series Number 27. Intrac Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Holzer, B.: 2001, ‘Translational Subpolitics and Corporate Discourse: A Study of Environmental Protest and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Sociology, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  37. Huxham, C., 1993. Pursuing Collaborative Advantage. The journal of Operational Research Society, 44(6) : 599-611.Google Scholar
  38. Huxham, C. and S. Vangen: 1996, ‘Working Together. Key Themes in the Management of Relationships Between Public and Non-Profit Organizations’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 9(7), 5–17.Google Scholar
  39. Huxham, C. and MacDonald, D., 1992. Introducing Collaborative Advantage: Achieving Inter-Organizational Effectiveness through Meta-strategy. Management Decision, 30(3): 50-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2000. Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1159-1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iyer, E., 2003. Theory of alliances: Partnerships and partner characteristics. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1):41-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jamali, D. and T. Keshishian: 2009, ‘Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships between Businesses and NGOs in the Context of CSR’, Journal of Business Ethics 84(1), 277–295.Google Scholar
  43. Kanter, R. M.: 1999, ‘From Spare Change to Real Change – The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation’, Harvard Business Review May–June, 122–132.Google Scholar
  44. Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R. & Kostwinder, E. (2008). Partnerships for development. European Management Journal, 26, (4), 262-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Korten, D C., 1990 Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global Agenda, West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  46. Koza, M. P. and A. Y. Lewin: 1998, ‘The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances’, Organization Science 9(3), 255–263.Google Scholar
  47. Lawrence, T. & Hardy, C. 1999. Building bridges for refugees: Toward a typology of bridging organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1): 48-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Le Ber, M.J. and Branzei, O., 2009. (Re) Forming Strategic Cross-Sector Partnerships Relational Processes of Social Innovation. Business & Society. 49 (1): 140-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lindgreen, A. (2008), Managing Market Relationships: Methodological and Empirical Insights. Gower Publishing, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  50. Long, F. J. and Arnold, M. B., 1995. The Power of Environmental Partnership. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  51. Macdonald S. and Piekkari, R., 2005. Out of control: personal networks in European collaboration. R&D Management, 35, 4: 441-453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin, R., 2000. Breaking the Code of Change. Observations and Critique. In: Beer, M., and N. Nohria (Eds.) Breaking the Code of Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  53. Matten, D., and Moon, J., 2008. Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404-424.Google Scholar
  54. McCann, J. 1983. Design guidelines for social problem solving interventions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(2): 177-192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McFarlan, F. W.: 1999, ‘Working on Nonprofit Boards: Don’t Assume the Shoe Fits’, Harvard Business Review November–December, 65–80.Google Scholar
  56. McKelvey, B.: 1997, ‘Perspective—Quasi-Natural Organization Science’, Organization Science 8(4), 351–380.Google Scholar
  57. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller, R. S., and Stephen, W. J. D., 1966. Spatial Relationships in Flocks of Sandhill Cranes (Grus Canadensis). Ecology, Vol. 47 (2): 323-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milne G. R., Iyer E. S., Gooding Williams S. (1996) Environmental Organization Alliance relationships within and across nonprofit business and government sectors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 15(2): 203–215.Google Scholar
  60. Mitsuhashi, H. and Greve, H., 2009. A Matching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (5): 975 – 995.Google Scholar
  61. Mortished, C.: 2003, ‘Miner May Have Dug Itself into a Hole’, The Times, p. 23.Google Scholar
  62. Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Phillips, N. and Zyglidopoulos, S. 1997. The evolution of corporate social responsiveness: An exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business & Society, 36(3): 296-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oliver, C., 1990. Determinants of interorganisational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15(2): 241-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oliver, P. E., and Johnston, H., 2000. What a Good Idea: Frames and Ideologies in Social Movement Research. Mobilization: An International Journal, 5: 37-54.Google Scholar
  65. Oster, S. M., 1995. Strategic Management for Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Parkin, S.: 2001, ‘Thirst for Justice’, The Guardian July 11, p. 8.Google Scholar
  67. Pettigrew, A.: 1985, ‘Contextualist Research and the Study of Organisational Change Process’, in: E. Mumford, R. Hirscheim, G. Fitzgerald and T. Wood-Harper (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 Colloquium, Manchester, UK, 1–3 Sept 1984 (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland).Google Scholar
  68. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  69. Power, M., 2004. The Risk Management of Everything. A Demos Publication. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  70. Ragin, C. C. (1991) Issues and alternatives in comparative social research. Leiden, The Netherlands; New York: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  71. Rio Tinto: Review, Dec 2002.Google Scholar
  72. Rondinelli,, D. A. and London, T., 2003. How Corporations and Environmental Groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1): 61-76.Google Scholar
  73. Scott, J. and Alwin, D., 1998. Retrospective versus prospective measurement of life histories in longitudinal research. In Giele, J.Z. & Elder Jr., G.H. Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Seitanidi M.M. (2008) Adaptive Responsibilities: Non-Linear Interactions Across Social Sectors. Cases from Cross Sector Social Partnerships. Emergence: Complexity & Organization E:CO Journal 10 (3): 51-64.Google Scholar
  75. Seitanidi, M.M., 2010. The Politics of Partnerships. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A., (2009) Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics 85: 413-429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Seitanidi, M. M., & Ryan, A., 2007. Forms of corporate community involvement: From partnerships to philanthropy. A critical review. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12: 247-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Selsky, J.W. and Parker, B.: 2005, ‘Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice’, Journal of Management, 31(6): 1-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shaffer, B. and A. J. Hillman: 2000, ‘The Development of Business-Government Strategies by Diversified Firms’, Strategic Management Journal 21(2), 175–190.Google Scholar
  80. Shen, J., 2005. Expanding the Frontier of Global Knowledge: Introduction. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change 2(1):3-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith Ring, P. and A. H. van de Ven: 1994, ‘Development Processes Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships’, Academy of Management Review 19(1), 90–118.Google Scholar
  82. Stafford, E. R. and Hartman C. L., 2000. Environmentalist-Business Collaborations: Social Responsibility, Green Alliances, and Beyond, in Advertising Research: The Internet, Consumer Behavior, and Strategy, G. Zinkhan, (Ed.), Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 170-192.Google Scholar
  83. Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S., 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 463-483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Waddell, S. and L. D. Brown: 1997, Fostering Inter- sectoral Partnering: A Guide to Promoting Cooperation Among Governement, Business and Civil Society Actors. IDR Reports 13(3). Available from: http://www.commdev.org/content/document/detail/1305/.
  85. Waddock, S.: 1989, ‘Understanding Social Partnerships. An Evolutionary Model of Partnership Organisations’, Administration & Society, 21(1): 78-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waddock, S. A.: 1991, ‘A Typology of Social Partnership Organizations’, Administration and Society 22(4), 480–515.Google Scholar
  87. Warner, M. and R. Sullivan: 2004, Putting Partnerships to Work: Strategic Alliances for Development between Government and Private Sector and Civil Society (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield).Google Scholar
  88. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L.K. and Cochran, P.L., 1999. Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices. Academy of Management Review, 42:539-552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weisbrod, B. A., (1998) Institutional Form and Organisational Behavior. In: W. W. Powell and S. Clemens (eds) Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven CT: Yale University Press pp. 69-84.Google Scholar
  90. Westley, F. and H. Vredenburg: 1997, ‘Interorganisational Collaboration and the Preservation of Global Biodiversity’, Organisation Science 8(4), 381–403.Google Scholar
  91. Wood, D.J., 1991. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wymer, W. W. Jr and Samu, S, 2003. Dimensions of Business and Nonprofit Collaborative Relationships. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 11(1): 3-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Young, D. R., 1999. Nonprofit Management Studies in the United States: Current Developments and Future Prospects. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(1): 13-23.Google Scholar
  94. Zahra, S. and George G., 2002. Absorptive Capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 185-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria May Seitanidi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dimitrios N. Koufopoulos
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paul Palmer
    • 4
  1. 1.Senior Lecturer in Corporate Social ResponsibilityDirector of the Centre for Organisational Ethics, Hull University Business School, University of HullCottingham Rd, HullU.K.
  2. 2.Senior Lecturer in Strategic ManagementBrunel Business School, Brunel UniversityUxbridgeU.K.
  3. 3.Scientific Director, Hellenic Observatory of Corporate Governance-HOCG
  4. 4.Professor of Voluntary Sector ManagementAssociate Dean Ethics, Sustainability and Engagement Cass Business School106 Bunhill RowU.K.

Personalised recommendations