Skip to main content
Log in

Institutional Antecedents of Partnering for Social Change: How Institutional Logics Shape Cross-Sector Social Partnerships

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heeding the call for a deeper understanding of how cross-sector social partnerships (CSSPs) can be managed across different contexts, this article integrates ideas from institutional theory with current debate on cross-boundary collaboration. Adopting the point of view of business actors interested in forming a CSSP to address complex social problems, we suggest that “appropriateness” needs shape business approaches toward partnering for social change, exerting an impact on the benefits that can be gained from it. A theoretical framework is proposed that identifies and frames four CSSP styles, as resulting from combinations of dominant institutional orientations in a field and its general level of coherence. We show how, depending on prevailing institutional logics, intervention models underlying the CSSP have to emphasize either the business soundness of the initiative or its social value, together with a consistent leadership style. Moreover, while directive approaches based on concentrated governance structures aimed at setting the rules of the game are shown to prevail in fields characterized by low level of institutional coherence, participative models emerge in more established fields, with CSSP’s promoter playing an integrative role through distributed governance structures. The article concludes with a summary and implications of an institutional-based view of CSSPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J. E.: 2000a, The Collaboration Challenge: How Nonprofits and Businesses Succeed through Strategic Alliances, (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E.: 2000b, ‘Strategic Collaboration between Nonprofits and Businesses’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., R. Ezequiel, and et al.: 2004, Social Partnering in Latin America: Lessons Drawn from Collaborations of Businesses and Civil Society Organizations, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., H. Stevenson, and J. Wei-Skillern: 2006, ‘Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different or Both?’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B., and J. Harrison: 2000, ‘Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value through Interorganizational Relationships’, Journal of Management, 26(3), 367-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M.: 1985, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, (Free Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I., P. Cunningham, and M. E. Drumwright: 2004, ‘Social Alliances: Company/Nonprofit Collaboration’, California Management Review, 47(1), 58-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., D. Korschun, and S. Sen: 2009, ‘Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Supplement 2), 257-272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann, J., and C. K. Prahalad: 2007, ‘Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact’, Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 80-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and M. Middleton Stone: 2006, ‘The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature’, Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, D. F., and D. R. Young (Eds.): 1996, Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads, (Indiana University Press, Bloomington: IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., L. A. Hayes, R. Karri, and P. Bernal: 2008, ‘Ethical Stewardship: Implications for Leadership and Trust’, Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1/2), 153-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W., and R. Mauborgne. 2005, Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make Competition Irrelevant, (Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R.: 2004, ‘The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise’, Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(4), 411-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davy, A.: 2004, ‘Ownership and Control of Outcomes’, in M. Warner, & R. Sullivan (Eds.), Putting Partnerships to Work: Strategic Alliances for Development between Government, the Private Sector and Civil Society,(Greenleaf publishing, Sheffield, UK), Vol., 210-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J.: 1997, ‘Culture and Cognition ‘, Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., and H. Anheier: 1990, ‘The Sociology of Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors’, Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., and H. Singh: 1998, ‘The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 1-322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., R. R. Alford (1991), ‘Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions’, In: W. W. Powell, P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), Institutionalim in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Vol, 232-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Googins, B. K., and S. A. Rochlin: 2000, ‘Creating the Partnership Society: Understanding the Rhetoric and Reality of Cross-Sectoral Partnerships’, Business & Society Review, 105(127-144).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamman, R., and N. Acutt: 2003, ‘How Should Civil Society (and the Government) Respond to ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’? A Critique of Business Motivations and the Potential for Partnerships’, Development Southern Africa, 20(2), 255-270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A., and R. Hayagreeva: 1997, ‘Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry’, American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1606-1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idemudia, U.: 2009, ‘Oil Extraction and Poverty Reduction in the Niger Delta: A Critical Examination of Partnership Initiatives’, Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 91-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1999, ‘From Spare Change to Real Change: The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation’, Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 122-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A.: 2007, ‘The Mirage of Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid: How the Private Sector Can Help Alleviate Poverty’, California Management Review, 49(4), 90-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A.: 2009, ‘Romanticizing the Poor’, Stanford Social Innovation Review 7, 38-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A., R. Palmer, M. Wetzel, and M. Antioco: 2009, ‘Do Different Marketing Practices Require Different Leadership Styles? An Exploratory Study’, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(1), 14-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S.: 2000, ‘Power in Partnerships? An Analysis of an Ngo’s Relationships with Its Partners’, Journal of International Development, 12, 227-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M., and M. A. Glynn: 2001, ‘Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 545-564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loza, J.: 2004, ‘Business-Community Partnerships: The Case for Community Organization Capacity Building’, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 207-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., and D. Reed: 2009, ‘Introduction: Special Issue on Business Partnerships for Development’, Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 1-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., and N. M. Pless: 2006, ‘Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society. A Relational Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J., and J. P. Olsen. 1989, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan: 1977, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, C., J. C. Choi, and S. Chen: 2004, ‘Global Strategic Partnerships between Mnes and Ngos: Drivers of Change and Ethical Issues’, Business & Society Review, 109(4), 395-414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, T.: 2001, ‘Mncs and Sustainable Business Practices: The Case of the Colombian and Peruvian Petroleum Industries ‘, World Development, 29(2), 291-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and M. Kramer: 1999, ‘Philanthropy’s New Agenda: Creating Value’, Harvard Business Review, 77, 121-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 57-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and M. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K.: 2004, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eredicating Poverty through Profits, (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H.: 1994, ‘The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1985-1912’, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 29-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A. M., and D. Reed: 2009, ‘Partnerships for Development: Four Models of Business Involvement’, Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 3-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., and L. Stott: 2009, ‘Working Together: Critical Perspectives on Six Cross-Sector Partnerships in Southern Africa’, Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 79-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuf, M.: 1999, ‘The Dynamics of Organizational Forms: Creating Market Actors in the Health Care Field’, Social Forces, 77(4), 1405-1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A., and T. London: 2003, ‘How Corporations and Environmental Groups Cooperate: Assessing Cross-Sector Alliances and Collaborations’, Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 61-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagawa, S., and E. Segal. 2000, Common Interest, Common Good, (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R.: 1995, Institutions and Organizations, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M., and W. E. Thurston: 2004, ‘The Influence of Social Context on Partnerships in Canadian Health Systems’, Gender, Work and Organization, 11(5), 481-506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M.: 2007, ‘Intangible Economy: How Can Investors Deliver Change in Businesses? Lessons from Nonprofit-Business Partnerships’, Management Decision, 45(5), 853-865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., and A. Crane: 2009, ‘Implementing Csr through Partnerships: Understanding the Selection, Design and Institutionalisation of Nonprofit-Business Partnerships’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Supplement 2), 413-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., and A. M. Ryan: 2007, ‘A Critical Review of Forms of Corporate Community Involvement: From Philanthropy to Partnerships’, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 12, 247-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W., and B. Parker: 2005, ‘Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice’, Journal of Management, 31(6), 849-873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sud, M., C. VanSandt, and A. Baugous: 2009, ‘Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Institutions’, Journal of Business Ethics, 1(85), 201-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surie, G., and A. Ashley: 2008, ‘Integrating Pragmatism and Ethics in Entrepreneurial Leadership for Sustainable Value Creation’, Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 235-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., and L. Zsolnai: 2008, ‘The Collaborative Enterprise’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 367-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P.: 2004, Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing, (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., and W. Ocasio: 1999, ‘Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990’, American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., and W. Ocasio. 2008, ‘Institutional Logics’, in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism,(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), Vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, S.: 2000, ‘Complementary Resources: The Win-Win Rationale for Partnerships with Ngos’, in J. Bendell (Ed.), Terms of Endearment. Business, Ngos and Sustainable Development,(Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield), Vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A.: 1989, ‘Understanding Social Partnerships: An Evolutionary Model of Partnership Organizations’, Administration and Society, 21(1), 78-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.: 1991, ‘A Typology of Social Partnership Organizations’, Administration and Society, 22(4), 480-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., and J. E. Post: 1991, ‘Social Entrepreneurs and Catalytic Change’, Public Administration Review, 51, 393-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., and N. C. Smith: 2000, ‘Relationships: The Real Challenge of Corporate Global Citizenship’, Business & Society, 105(1), 47-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M., and R. Sullivan. 2004, Putting Partnerships to Work: Strategic Alliances for Development between the Government, the Private Sector and Civil Society, (Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., and H. Vredenburg: 1997, ‘Interorganizational Collaboration and the Preservation of Global Biodiversity’, Organization Science, 8(4), 381-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W. W., and S. Samu: 2003, ‘Dimensions of Business and Nonprofit Collaborative Relationships’, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11, 3-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G.: 1977, ‘The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence’, American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clodia Vurro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vurro, C., Dacin, M.T. & Perrini, F. Institutional Antecedents of Partnering for Social Change: How Institutional Logics Shape Cross-Sector Social Partnerships. J Bus Ethics 94 (Suppl 1), 39–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0778-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0778-0

Key words

Navigation