Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 101, Issue 4, pp 577–599

The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work

Article
  • 335 Downloads

Abstract

This article outlines the structure of a Rawlsian theory of justice in the employment relationship. A focus on this theory is motivated by the role it plays in debates in business ethics. The Rawlsian theory answers three central questions about justice and the workplace. What is the relationship between social justice and justice at work? How should we conceive of the problem of justice in the economic sphere? And, what is justice in the workplace? To see fully what demands justice makes on the workplace, we should first spell out the implications that domestic justice has for working conditions. When this is done, we can develop a conception of workplace justice and investigate what content such local justice should have. John Rawls’s political liberalism was constructed for the specific problem of a just basic structure; in order to apply it to another problem the key theoretical concepts must be revised. Reasons for a specific construction of a local original position are given and arguments are presented in support of a principle of local justice, which takes the form of a choice egalitarian local difference principle.

Keywords

choice egalitarianism desert employment contracts justice as fairness local justice reciprocity responsibility work workplace justice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, S. 1974. “Social Evaluation Through Notional Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 597-624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. S. 1999. “What is the Point of Equality.” Ethics 109, pp. 287-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, S. and J. Cavanagh. 2000. Top 200: The Rise of Corporate Global Power. (Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies).Google Scholar
  4. Arneson, R. 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56, pp. 77-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arneson, R. 1999. “Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity.” Philosophical Studies 93, pp. 77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry, B. 2005. Why Social Justice Matters. (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  7. Boaz, D. 1997. LibertarianismA Primer. (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  8. Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels. 2000. “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition.” American Economic Review 90, pp.166-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouckaert, B and G. De Geest (eds.) 2000. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume III. The Regulation of Contracts. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  10. Bowles, S. 2004. MicroeconomicsBehavior, Institutions and Evolution. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Brousseau, E. and J. M. Glachant. 2002. The Economics of Contract. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cappelen, A., E. Ø. SØrensen and B. Tungodden: 2005, ‘Responsibility for What? An Experimental Approach to Responsibility and Fairness’, NHH Discussion Paper 15/05.Google Scholar
  13. Charness, G. and M. Rabin. 2002. “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, pp. 817-869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, B. and H. Gintis 1978. “Rawlsian Justice and Economic Systems.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 7, pp. 302-325.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99, pp. 906-944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniels, N. (2002) Democratic Equality – Rawls’s Complex Egalitarianism. In: S. Freeman (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 241-276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De George, R. T. 2006. Business Ethics, 6th edition. (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  18. DesJardins, J. R., and J. J. McCall. 2005. Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics. 5th edition. (Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth).Google Scholar
  19. Dworkin, R. 1981. “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10, pp. 283-345.Google Scholar
  20. Elster, J. 1992. Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. (New York: Russell Sage).Google Scholar
  21. Ewing, D. W. 1978. Freedom Inside the Organization: Bringing Civil Liberties to the Workplace. (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  22. Fehr, E. and A. Falk. 2002. “Psychological Foundations of Incentives.” European Economic Review 46, pp. 687- 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fehr, E. and K. M. Schmidt. 1999. “A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, pp. 817-868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freeman, S. 2007. Rawls. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, M. 1962. Freedom and Capitalism. (Chicago: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  26. Harsanyi, J. C. 1975. “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory.” American Political Science Review 69, pp. 594-606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hart, O. 2002. “Norms and the Theory of the Firm.” In The Economics of Contract, Eric Brousseau and Jean Michel Glachant (ed.), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 180 – 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartman, E. 2001. “Moral Philosophy, and Organizational Ethics: A Response to Phillips and Margolis.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11, pp. 673-685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  30. Hsieh, N-h. 2005. “Rawlsian Justice and Workplace Republicanism.” Social Theory and Practice 31, pp. 115-142.Google Scholar
  31. ILO: 1998, ‘The ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work’, http://www.ilo.org/dyn/declaris/DECLARATIONWEB.static_jump?var_language=EN&var_pagename=DECLARATIONTEXT. Accessed 23 October 2007.
  32. Konow, J. 1996. “A Positive Theory of Economic Fairness.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31, pp. 13-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindblom, L. 2007. “Dissolving the Moral Dilemma of Whistleblowing.” Journal of Business Ethics 76, pp. 413-426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindblom, L. and S. O. Hansson. 2004. “Evaluating Workplace Inspections.” Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 2, pp. 77-91.Google Scholar
  35. Lukács, E. 2005. “The Economic Role of SMEs in World Economy, Especially in Europe.” European Integration Studies 1, pp. 3-12.Google Scholar
  36. McLeod, O. 1996. “Desert and Wages.” Utilitas 8, pp. 205-221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts. 1992. Economics, Organization and Management. (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  38. Miller, D. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  39. Miller, D. 2004. “The Concept of Desert.” In Social Justice. M. Clayton and A. Williams (eds.) (Malden: Blackwell Publishing) pp. 186- 2000.Google Scholar
  40. Moriarty, J. 2005a. “Do CEOs Get Paid Too Much?” Business Ethics Quarterly 15, pp. 257-281.Google Scholar
  41. Moriarty, J. 2005b. “On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 15, pp. 455-473.Google Scholar
  42. Musgrave, R. A. 1974. “Maximin, Uncertainty, and the Leisure Trade-off.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 625-632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  44. Pava, M. L. 1998. “Religious Business Ethics and Political Liberalism: An Integrative Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics 17, pp. 1633-1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pence, G. (1978). Towards a Theory of Work. Philosophical Forum 10(1-3), 307-320.Google Scholar
  46. Phillips, R. A., and J. D. Margolis. 1999. “Toward an Ethics of Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9, pp. 619-638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pogge, T. 1989. Realizing Rawls. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  48. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  49. Rawls, J. 1974. “Reply to Musgrave and Alexander.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 633-655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rawls, J. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.” Philosophyand Public Affairs, 14, pp. 223-251.Google Scholar
  51. Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism, 2nd edition. (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  52. Rawls, J.: 1999a, in S. Freeman (ed.), Collected Papers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  53. Rawls, J. 1999b. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  54. Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  55. Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. (Cambridge: The Belknap of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  56. Stigler, G. (1981). Economics or Ethics? In S. McMurrin (ed.) Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  57. Van Parijs, P. (2003). Difference Principles. In S. Freeman (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  58. Vandekerckhove, W. and M. S. R. Commers. 2004. “Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty.” Journal of Business Ethics 53, pp. 225-233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vandenberghe, A.-S. (2000) Labor Contracts. In B. Bouckaert, G. DeGeest (eds.) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics III The Regulation of Contracts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 541-560.Google Scholar
  60. Waldron, J. 1986. “John Rawls and the Social Minimum.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 3, pp.21-33.Google Scholar
  61. Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of JusticeA Defense of Pluralism and Equality. (New York: Basic Books). Google Scholar
  62. Young, S. P., ed. 2004. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme. (New York: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and the History of Technology, Division of PhilosophyRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations