Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has existed in name for over 70 years. It is practiced in many countries and it is studied in academia around the world. However, CSR is not a universally adopted concept as it is understood differentially despite increasing pressures for its incorporation into business practices. This lack of a clear definition is complicated by the use of ambiguous terms in the proffered definitions and disputes as to where corporate governance is best addressed by many of the national bodies legislating, mandating, or recommending CSR. This article explores the definitions of CSR as published on the Internet by governments in four countries (United Kingdom (UK), France, the United States, and Canada). We look for a consensus of understanding in an attempt to propose a more universal framework to enhance international adoption and practice of CSR using the triple bottom line. Our results concur with the findings of both national and international bodies and suggest that both within and among the countries in our study there exists no clear definition of the concept of CSR. While there are some similarities, there are substantial differences that must be addressed. We present a number of proposals for a more universal framework to define CSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, R.W. and R.A. Bauer: 1976, Corporate Social Responsiveness, (Reston, VA: Reston Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • AFNOR: n.d., ‘Développement Durable’, http://www.afnor.org/profils/centre-d-interet/developpement-durable. 19 February 2010.

  • Agle, B.R., R.K. Mitchell, and J.A. Sonnenfeld: 1999, ‘Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values’, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antal, A.B. and A. Sobczak: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in France: A Mix of National Traditions and International Influences’, Business & Society, 46(1), 9-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.: 1995, Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argandona, A. and H. von Weltzien Hoivik: 2010, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: One Size Does not Fit All. Collecting Evidence from Europe’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(Supplement 3), 221-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, J. 1975, Social Responsibility and Accountability, (New York, NY: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle Jr., A.A.: 1932, ‘For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees: A note’, Harvard Law Review, 45(8), 1365-1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, (New York, NY : Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A., and Herremans, I.: 2010, ‘When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy’, Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 297-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI: 2010, ‘Assessment & Certification’, http://www.bsigroup.com/en/BSI-UK/Assessment-and-Certification-services/Management-systems/Standards-and-Schemes/BS-8901/. 18 February 2010.

  • Buchholtz RA, Rosenthal SB (1999) Social responsibility and business ethics. In: Frederick RE (ed.) A Companion to Business Ethics. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 303–321.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buhr, H. and M. Grafstöm: 2004: CSR Edited in the Business Press – Package Solutions with Problems Included. Paper Presented at the EGOS Colloquium, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1–3 July 2004.

  • Campbell, T.: 2007: ‘The Normative Grounding of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Human Rights Approach’, in D.J; McBarnet, A. Voiculescu, and T. Campbell (Eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Business for Social Responsibility: 2008, ‘Home Page’, http://www.cbsr.ca/about-cbsr/about-cbsr. 18 February 2010.

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B.: 1983, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Will Industry Respond to Cutbacks in Social Program Funding?’, Vital Speeches of the Day, 49(19), 604-608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B.: 1991, ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G.R., J. Delacroix (1982) ‘Organizational Mortality in the Newspaper Industries of Argentina and Ireland: An Ecological Approach’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(2):169-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBI: 2009, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, http://www.cbi.org.uk/ndbs/content.nsf/802737AED3E3420580256706005390AE/9D502144AC9F644380256F58005BD16C. 18 January 2010.

  • Chalmers, D.M.: 1959, ‘The Muckrakers and the Growth of Corporate Power: A Study in Constructive Journalism’, American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 18(3), 295-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chih, H-L., Chih, H-H., and Chen, T-Y.: 2010, ‘On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry’, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 115-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIA: 2010, ‘The World Factbook’, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.

  • Clark, J.M.: 1926, Social Control of Business, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Economic Development: 1971, Social Responsibility of Business Corporations, (New York: Committee for Economic Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., Moon, J.: 2004, ‘Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participation, and democracy?’, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 107-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R.I. and H.A. Gram: 1978, ‘Social Responsibility as Interorganizational Transaction’, The Academy of Management Review, 3(4), 880-888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, P.T.: 1971, ‘The Professional Manager of the Future’, Management of Personnel Quarterly, 10(3), 4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, L.B., E.A. Pedrozo: 2009, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Management: Relation Between Headquarters and Subsidiary in Multinational Corporations’, Management Decision, 47(7):1174-00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSR Newswire: 2010, ‘CSRlive: Contribute, Discover, Share’, http://www.csrwire.com/csrlive/?category=14. 5 January 2010.

  • Dahlsrud, A.: 2008, ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1960, ‘Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibility?’, California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2): 312-322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. and R.L. Blomstrom: 1966, Business and Its Environment, (New York, NY: McGraw Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update’, http://www.colombiaincluyente.org/documentos/CSR%20UK%20Documento%20del%20Ministerio.pdf. 20 February 2010.

  • DiMaggio, P., and W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationalist in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobers, P. and Springett, D.: 2010, ‘Corporate social responsibility: Discourse, narratives and communication’, Corporation Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), 63-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doing Business: 2010, ‘Ease of Doing Business Rank’, http://www.doingbusiness.org/EconomyRankings/. 18 February 2010.

  • Donham, W.B.: 1927, ‘The Social Significance of Business’, Harvard Business Review, 5(4), 406-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donham, W.B. 1929 ‘Business Ethics – A General Survey’, Harvard Business Review, 7(4):385-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (Ed.): 1969, Preparing Tomorrow’s Business Leaders Today, pp. 280-289. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhé, S.C.: 2009, ‘Two Decades of U.S. Corporate Insider Perspectives on Reputation and the Bottom Line’, Public Relations Review, 35(1), 77-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eells, R.: 1958, ‘Corporate Giving: Theory and Practice’, California Management Review, 1(1), 37-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, R., and C. Walton: 1961, Conceptual Foundations of Business, (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, R. and C. Walton: 1974, Conceptual Foundations of Business (3rd Ed.), (Burr Ridge, Il: Irwin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilbert, H. and I.R. Parket: 1973, ‘The Current Status of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Business Horizons: 16(4), 5-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E.M.: 1987, ‘The Corporate Social Policy Process: Beyond Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social Responsiveness’, California Management Review, 29(3), 99-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E.M.: 1989, ‘Business Ethics; Corporate Good Citizenship and the Corporate Social Policy Process: A View from the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics, 8(8): 583-595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, H.G.: 1976, ‘Achieving Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review: 1(1), 38-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman Hillard Inc.: 2007, ‘Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility. A Fleishman-Hillard/National Consumers League Study’, http://www.csrresults.com/CSR_ExecutiveSummary07.pdf. 24 January 2010.

  • Forbes.com: 2010, ‘The Global 2000’, http://www.forbes.com/lists/2009/18/global-09_The-Global-2000_Counrty.html. 18 February 2010.

  • Franklin, D.: 2008, ‘Just Good Business: A Special Report on Corporate Social Responsibility’, The Economist 386(8563), 3–6, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.C.: 1960, ‘The Growing Concern Over Business Responsibility’, California Management Review: 2(4), 54-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.C.: 2006, Corporation, be good! The story of corporate social responsibility. Indianapolis, IN: Dog Ear Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, I. and I. Sussin: 2010, ‘International Cultural Competence in International Business Education: The Need to Respond’, The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, & Social Sustainability 6(1), 355–370.

  • Freeman, R.E. and J. Liedtka: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Approach’, Business Horizons, 34(4), 92-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine. http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html. 20 January 2010.

  • Fulmer, R.M.: 1971, ‘Business Ethics: Present and Future’, Personnel Administration, 34, 48-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J.: 2010, ‘Drivers of corporate social responsibility: The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture,’ British Journal of Management, 21(2), 511-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accountancy Office: 2005, ‘Globalization: Numerous Federal Activities Complement U.S. Business’s Global Corporate Social Responsibility Efforts’, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05744.pdf. 25 January 2010.

  • Gjølberg, M.: 2009, ‘The Origin of Corporate Social Responsibility: Global Forces or National Legacies?’, Socio-Economic Review, 7(4), 605-637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P.C.L.: 2005, ‘The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholders Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P.C. and N.W. Hatch.: 2007, ‘Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century’, Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87-98,

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeke, J.R. and C.S. Weymar: 1969, ‘Barriers to Hiring the Blacks’, Harvard Business Review, 47(5), 144-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K.E.: 2007. Conscience and Corporate Culture, (Oxford, UK; Blackwell Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of France, Loi No. 2001-420: 2001, ‘Loi Nouvelle Régulations Economiques’, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JOFTEXT000000223114. 20 January 2010.

  • Graves, S.B. and S.A. Waddock: 1994, ‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034-1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, D. and R. Durand: 2008, ‘Social Issues in the Study of Management’, European Management Review, 5(3), 137-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, J.M. and Arnold, S.J.: 1999, ‘The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment’, Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, R.D., E.R. Gray, and J.D. Gates: 1976, Business and Society, (Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. and G.J. Hofstede: 2005, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (2nd Ed.), (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghiemstra, R.: 2000, ‘Corporate communication and impression management – new perspectives who companies engage in corporate social reporting’, Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 55-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM: 2009, Corporate Responsibility Report 2008, (Chengdu, China: Global Reporting Initiative).

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Canada: 2010, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/csr-rse.nsf/eng/home. 20 February 2010.

  • Internet World Stats: 2010, ‘Ìnternet Usage Statistics’, http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.

  • ISO: 2008, ‘About the Standard’, Social Responsibility. http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/830949/3934883/3935096/07_gen_info/aboutStd.html. 31 March 2010.

  • Jacques, A.: 2010. ‘Socially conscious: Companies share CSR best practices’, Public Relations Tactics, July 2010, 12-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.L.: 1971 Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M.: 1980, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined’, California Management Review: 22(3), 59-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalwarski, T.: 2010, ‘It Pays to be Good’, Businessweek, February 1. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_05/c4165moneyrepo963671.htm. 22 January 2010.

  • Knill, C., and D. Lehmkuhl: 2002, ‘Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance’, Governance, 15(1), 41-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koleva, P. : 2005, ‘La Responsabilité Sociale des Enterprises dans les Pays Européens en Transition : Réalitié et Limites’, La Revue des Sciences de Gestion : Direction et Gestion, 40(211/212), 155-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, T.: 1940, ‘Measurement of the Social Performance of Business’, in K. R. Wright (ed.), An Investigation of Concentration of Economic Power for the Temporary National Economic Committee, Monograph 7 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).

  • Kung, H.: 1997, ‘A global ethic in an age of globalization’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 17-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G.P.: 2002, ‘The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(2/3), 205-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattemann, C., M. Fetscherin, I. Alon, L. Shaomin, and A.M. Schneider: 2009, ‘CSR Communication Intensity in Chinese and Indian Multinational Companies’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 426-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T.: 1958, ‘The Dangers of Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review, 36(5), 41-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., and Maon, F.: 2009, ‘Corporate social responsibility implementation,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl. 2), 251-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T.: 2008, ‘Undivided Corporate Responsibility: Toward a Theory of Corporate Integrity’, Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 353-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclagan, P.W.: 1998, Management and Morality, London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. and Ralston, D.A.: 2002, ‘Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, H., and H.C. Wallich: 1972, The Modern Corporation and Social Responsibility, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., and Swaen, V.: 2010, ‘Consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 20-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. and J. Walsh: 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markley, M. and L. Davis: 2007, ‘Sustainability in supply chains: The triple bottom line approach to future competitive advantage’, Society for Marketing Advances Proceedings, 273–274.

  • Matten, D. and Moon, J.: 2004, ‘Corporate social responsibility education in Europe’, Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4): 323-337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J.W.: 1963, Business and Society, (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and B. Rowan, B.: 1977, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministére de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Développement et de la mer: n.d., ‘Focus’, http://www.semainedudeveloppementdurable.gouv.fr/. 18 February 2010.

  • Ministére des Affaires Etrangiéurs et Européenne: 2009, ‘Droits Economiques, Sociaux et Culturels’, http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/actions-france_830/droits-homme_1048/droits-economiques-sociaux-culturels_4720/responsabilite-sociale-entreprises-engagement-france_17059.html. 24 January 2010.

  • Moran, M.: 2002, ‘Understanding the Regulatory State’, British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 391-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippa, M. and A. Klossek: 2008, ‘Reflections on Corporate Social Responsibility in Differing Institutional Systems: How Chinese, German, and U.S. Corporations Address Stakeholder Interests’, Sciences de Gestion, 65, 155-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoye, A.: 2009, ‘Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613-627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G.S. and A.G. Scherer: 2006, ‘Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Péron, M. and M. Bonnet: 2008. ‘CSR in Intervention-Research : Example of an Implementation of the SEAM Model’, Revue Sciences de Gestion, 65, 239-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, E.S. (2010) ‘Deviance or norm? Exploring corporate social responsibility’, European Business Review, 22(4):397-410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Trend and a Movement, but of What and for What?’, Corporate Governance, 6(5), 595-608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S. and A.B. Carroll: 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review, 17(3), 58-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberova, I. and D. Pollard: 2008, ‘Stakeholder Relations Focus in Marketing Concepts of Companies’, Economics & Management 13, 305–312.

  • Simon, H.A.: 1957, Models of Man: Social and Rational, (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, H.F.: 1982, ‘Prevailing Rationales in the Corporate Social Responsibility Debate’, Journal of Business Ethics, 1(2), 139-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G.A.: 1971, Business and Society, (New York, NY: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, C., M. Stohl, and L. Popova: 2009, ‘A New Generation of Corporate Codes of Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 607-622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, V.M., J. Gao, and P. Bansal: 2006, ‘Being Good While Being Bad: Social Responsibility and the International Diversification of US Firms’, Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850-862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surroca, J., Tribo, J.A., and Waddock, S.: 2009, ‘Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • The European Sustainability Reporting Association: 2008, ‘Home Page’, http://www.sustainabilityreporting.eu/. 18 February 2010.

  • The Globe and Mail: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Ranking’, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/article813500.ece. 18 February 2010.

  • Tschopp, D.J.: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparison Between the United States and the European Union’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(1), 55-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D.B. and D.W. Greening: 1997, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Government Accountability Office: 2006, ‘Globalization. Numerous Federal Activities Complement U.S. Business’s Global Corporate Social Responsibility Efforts’, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05744.pdf. 20 February 2010.

  • Vaaland, T. I. and M. Heide: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsiveness: Exploring the Dynamics of `Bad Episides’', European Management Journal 23(5), 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venard, B.: 2001, Management Research Between Sense and Action, Paper Presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings 2001.

  • Visser, W.: 2005, ‘Revisiting Carroll’s Pyramid: An African Perspective’, http://www.waynevisser.com/chapter_wvisser_africa_csr_pyramid.pdf. 20 January 2010.

  • Votaw, D.: 1972, ‘Genius Becomes Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility, Pt. 1’, California Management Review, 15(2), 25-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., M. S. de Luque, N. Washburn, R. J. House, et al.: 2006, ‘Cultural and Leadership Predictors of Corporate Social Responsibility Values of Top Management: A GLOBE Study of 15 Countries’, Journal of International Business Studies 37(6), 823-837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, C.C.: 1967, Corporate Social Responsibilities, (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S.L. and P.L. Cochran: 1985, ‘The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model’, Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzner, D. and J. Darroch: 2009, ‘Why Moral Failures Precede Financial Crises’, Critical Perspectives on International Business 5(1/2), 6–13.

  • Windsor, D,: 2009, ‘Tightening corporate governance’, Journal of International Management, 15(3), 306-316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wry, T.E.: 2009, ‘Does Business and Society Scholarship Matter to Society? Pursuing a Normative Agenda with Critical Realism and Neoinstitutional Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 151-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenisek, T.J.: 1979, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Conceptualization Based on Organizational Literature’, Academy of Management, 4(3), 359-368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESC Rennes School of Business, 2 rue Robert d’Arbrissel, 35000, Rennes, France

    Ina Freeman

  2. La Rochelle Business School/Centre de Recherche TELECOM Ecole de Management, 102 rue de Coureilles, Les Minimes, 17000, La Rochelle, France

    Amir Hasnaoui

Authors
  1. Ina Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amir Hasnaoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Hasnaoui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeman, I., Hasnaoui, A. The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations. J Bus Ethics 100, 419–443 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0688-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0688-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation