Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 381–404 | Cite as

Different Talks with Different Folks: A Comparative Survey of Stakeholder Dialog in Germany, Italy, and the U.S.

  • André Habisch
  • Lorenzo Patelli
  • Matteo PedriniEmail author
  • Christoph Schwartz
Article

Abstract

Although theoretical underpinnings of stakeholder dialog (SD) have been extensively discussed in the extant literature, there is a lack of empirical studies presenting evidence on the SD initiatives undertaken by firms. In this article, we provide information about 294 SD initiatives collected through a content analysis of the sustainability reports published by large firms in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. In addition to a country-based description of the different forms, stakeholder categories, and topics of the SD initiatives, we explore the relationship between SD and characteristics of national business systems. Overall, we find firms undertake few SD initiatives, using low-involvement forms of dialog, and focusing on one category of stakeholders per initiative. Results suggest that the explicit approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR) favors the quantity of SD initiatives, but neglects the importance of the level of involvement and diversity of stakeholders participating at the dialog. Finally, we find public policies on CSR have a substantial influence on SD in national business systems with an implicit approach to CSR. Public policies based on a shared discussion involving multiple social actors encourage SD initiatives that use different forms of dialog and are characterized by high level of involvement. Our findings offer contributions to the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of SD and its relationship with CSR.

Keywords

stakeholder dialog sustainability reporting corporate social responsibility international study 

Abbreviations

SD

Stakeholder dialog

CSR

Corporate social responsibility

SDI

Stakeholder Diversity Index

FDI

Form Diversity Index

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accountability: 2007, Accountability rating, (Accountability, London).Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C. A. and G. Harte: 1999, Towards Corporate Accountability for Equal Opportunities Performance, (Certified Accountants Education Trust, London).Google Scholar
  3. Adams, C. A., W. Y. Hill and C. B. Roberts: 1995, Environmental, Employee and Ethical Reporting in Europe, (Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London).Google Scholar
  4. Albareda, L., J.M. Lozano, A. Tencati, A. Midttun, and Francesco Perrinin: 2008, ‘The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 347-363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albareda, L., A. Tencati, J.M. Lozano and F. Perrini: 2006, ‘The government’s role in promoting corporate responsibility: a comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective’, Corporate Governance 6(4), 386-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, M. L.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 794-816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, M. L. and R. Salomon: 2006, ‘Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance’, Strategic Management Journal 27(11), 1101-1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertelsmann Foundation and GTZ: 2007, The CSR Navigator – Public Policies in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe (Bertelsmann Foundation & GTZ, Eschborn). http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de. Accessed 3 October 2009.
  9. Boesso, G. and K. Kumar: 2009, ′Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US′, Accounting Forum 33, 162-175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buehler, V. M. and Y. K. Shetty: 1974, ‘Motivations for Corporate Social Action’, The Academy of Management Journal 17(4), 767-771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burchell, J. and J. Cook: 2006a, ‘Assessing the impact of stakeholder dialogue: changing relationships between NGOs and companies’, Journal of Public Affairs 6, 210-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burchell, J. and J. Cook: 2006b, ‘It′s Good to Talk? Examining attitudes towards corporate social responsibility dialogue and engagement processes’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(2), 154-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burchell, J. and J. Cook: 2008, ‘Stakeholder dialogue and organizational learning: changing relationships between companies and NGOs’, Business Ethics: A European Review 17(1), 35-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, S. and P. Bouvain: 2008, ‘Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany’, Journal of Business Ethics 87, 299-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CNN Money: 2009, Global 500Annual Ranking of the World’s Largest Corporations. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2009/countries/Germany.html. Accessed 8 October 2009.
  16. Coombs, J. and K. M. Gilley: 2005, ‘Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation’, Strategic Management Journal 26, 827-840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davenport, K.: 2000, ‘Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it’, Business and Society 39(2), 210-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deegan, C.: 2002, ‘The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures - a theoretical foundation’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3), 282-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epstein, M. J. and M. J. Roy: 2003, ′Improving Sustainability Performance: Specifying, Implementing and Measuring Key Principles′, Journal of General Management 29(1), 15-31.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission: 2003, SMEs in Europe 2003 (Enterprise Publications, Luxembourg).Google Scholar
  21. European Union (2002) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development. Employment and Social Affairs Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  22. Farrell, B. J. and D. M. Cobbin: 1996, ‘A Content Analysis of Codes of Ethics in Australian Enterprises’, Journal of Managerial Psychology 11(1), 37-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Federal Statistical Office: 2008, Statistical Yearbook 2008, (Federal Statistical Office, Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
  24. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, (Pitman Publishing Inc, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
  25. Frooman, J.: 1999, ‘Stakeholder influence strategies’, Academy of Management Review 24, 191-205.Google Scholar
  26. Gray, R., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers: 1995, ‘Methodological Themes. Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK Companies, Accounting’, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2), 78-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwood, M.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 74, 315-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Habisch, A. and J. Moon: 2006, ′Social Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility′, in: Jonker, J. and M. de Witte: Eds., The challenge of organising and implementing CSR, (Palgrave, London), 63-77.Google Scholar
  29. Habisch, A. and M. Wegner: 2005, ′Germany - Overcoming the Heritage of Corporatism′, in: Habisch, A., J. Jonker, M. Wegner and R. Schmidpeter: Eds., Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe, (Springer, Heidelberg).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hackston, D. and M. J. Milne: 1996, ‘Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9(1), 77-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hammann, E., Habisch, A. & Pechlaner, H.(2009) ‘Values that create value: socially responsible business practices in SMEs - empirical evidence from German companies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 18(1), 37-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, J. S. and R. E. Freeman: 1999, ‘Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives’, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 479-485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hendry, J. R.: 2005, ‘Stakeholder Influence Strategies: An Empirical Exploration’, Journal of Business Ethics 61, 79-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hess, D.: 2007, ‘Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation: The prospects of achieving Corporate Accountability through Transparency’, Business Ethics Quarterly 17(3), 453-476.Google Scholar
  35. Hess, D.: 2008, ‘The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation: Disclosure, Dialogue and Development’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18(4), 447-482.Google Scholar
  36. Hillman, A. J. and G. D. Keim: 2001, ‘Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: what’s the bottom line?’, Strategic Management Journal 22, 125-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  38. Holder-Webb, L. and J. R. Cohen: 2007, ‘The association between disclosure, distress, and failure’, Journal of Business Ethics 75(1), 301-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hussain, S. S.: 1999, ′The Ethics of ′Going Green′: The Corporate Social Responsibility Debate′, Business Strategy and the Environment 8, 203-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Institute for Ecological Economy Research, Future e. V.: 2007, Sustainability Reporting in Germany. Results and Trends in the Ranking 2007, (Institute for Ecological Economy Research and Future e. V., Berlin).Google Scholar
  41. International Monetary Fund: 2009a, World economic outlook database April 2009, (International Monetary Fund, Italy).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. International Monetary Fund: 2009b, World Economic Outlook Database October 2009, (International Monetary Fund, Germany).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kassinis, G. and N. Vafeas: 2006, ‘Stakeholder Pressures and Environmental Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 49(1), 145-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. KPMG: 2005, International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005, (KMPG Global Sustainability Services, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  45. KPMG: 2008, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008, (KPMG International, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  46. Lawrence, A. T.: 2002, ′The drivers of stakeholder engagement: reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell′, in: Sutherland Rahman, S., S. Waddock, J. Andriof, and B. Husted: Eds., Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility, Engagement (Sheffield: Greenleaf).Google Scholar
  47. Maignan, I. and D. A. Ralston: 2002, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-Representations’, Journal of International Business Studies 33(3), 497-514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marcuccio, M. and I. Steccolini: 2005, ‘Social and Environmental Reporting in Local Authorities. A new Italian Fashion?’, Public Management Review 7(2), 155-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility′, Academy of Management Review 33(2), 404-424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLaren, D.: 2004, ‘Global Stakeholders: corporate accountability and investor engagement’, Corporate Governance: An International Review 12(2), 191-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining The Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.Google Scholar
  52. Morsing M. and M. Schultz: 2006, ‘Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4), 323-338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Riordan, L. and J. Fairbrass: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR: Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue’, Journal of Business Ethics 83, 745-758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Observatory of European SMEs: 2002, European SMEs and social environmental responsibility (Brussels: European Commission).Google Scholar
  55. OECD: 2009, Factbook - Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, (OECD, Paris).Google Scholar
  56. Owen, D. L., T. Swift and K. Hunt: 2001, ′Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting′, Accounting Forum 25(3), 264-282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Patelli, L. and A. Prencipe: 2007, `The Relationship Between Voluntary Disclosure and Independent Directors in Presence of a Dominant Shareholder', European Accounting Review 16(1), 5–33.Google Scholar
  58. Payne, S. L., J. M. Calton (2002) Towards a Managerial Practice of Stakeholder Engagement: Developing Multi-Stakeholder Learning Dialogues. In: S. Sutherland Rahman, S. Waddock, J. Andriof, B. Husted (Eds.) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility, Engagement. Greenleaf, Sheffield.Google Scholar
  59. Pedersen, E. R.: 2006, ‘Making Corporate Responsibility: CSR) Operable: How Companies Translate Stakeholder Dialogue into Practice’, Business and Society Review 111(2), 137-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Perrini, F.: 2006, ‘SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 67, 305-316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perrini, F., S. Pogutz, and A. Tencati: 2006, ‘Corporate social responsibility in Italy: state of the art’, Journal of Business Strategies 23(1), 1-44.Google Scholar
  62. Pleon: 2004, Geheime Mission? Deutsche Unternehmen im Dialog mit kritischen Stakeholdern. Eine Umfrage unter den 150 grössten Unternehmen [Secret Mission? German Companies in Dialogue with Critical Stakeholders. A Survey Among 150 Largest Companies] (Pleon, Bonn).Google Scholar
  63. Russo, A. and A. Tencati: 2009, ‘Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence From Italian Micro, Small, Medium-sized, and Large Firms’, Journal Of Business Ethics 85, 339-353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sillanpää, M.: 1998, ′The Body Shop Values Report - Towards Integrated Stakeholder Auditing′, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1443-1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spence, L., A. Habisch and R. Schmidpeter: Eds.: 2004, Social Capital and Responsibility - The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (PalgraveMcMillan, Hampshire).Google Scholar
  66. Steurer, R.: 2010, ‘The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe’, Policy Sciences, 43, 49-72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Swift, T.: 2001, ′Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders′, Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1), 16-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tonkin, D. J. and L. C. L. Skerratt: 1991, Financial Reporting 1991-1992: A Survey of UK Reporting practice, (ICAEW, London).Google Scholar
  69. Van Buren, H., III: 2001, ‘If Fairness is the Problem, is Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stake- holder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3), 481– 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weaver, G., L. Trevino and P. Cochran: 1999, ‘Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: A management commitments, external pressures and corporate ethics practices’, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 539-552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weber, R. P.: 1988, Basic Content Analysis, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 7-049, (Sage, Beverly Hills, London).Google Scholar
  72. Whitley, R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  73. Williams, R.C.: 2007, The Cooperative Movement, (Ashgate Publishing, Hampshire).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Habisch
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Patelli
    • 2
  • Matteo Pedrini
    • 3
    Email author
  • Christoph Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Christian Social Ethics in Business and SocietyCatholic University of Eichstaett-IngolstadtEichstaettGermany
  2. 2.School of BusinessBenedictine CollegeAtchisonU.S.A
  3. 3.ALTIS-Postgraduate School Business and SocietyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations