Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 349–366 | Cite as

Ethical Leader Behavior and Big Five Factors of Personality

  • Karianne Kalshoven
  • Deanne N. Den Hartog
  • Annebel H. B. De Hoogh


Most research on ethical leadership to date investigates the consequences of ethical leadership rather than its antecedents. Here, we aim to contribute to this field by studying leader personality as a potential antecedent of ethical leader behavior. In two multisource studies, we investigated the relationships between personality traits and ethical leader behavior. Leader personality was measured through self-ratings using the five-factor personality framework. Two subordinates rated their leaders’ ethical behavior. Study 1 used a uni-dimensional Ethical Leadership Scale (ELS). In study 2 we used this scale as well as an instrument distinguishing three different ethical leader behaviors, namely, fairness, role clarification, and power sharing. Further, in study 2 we controlled for the influence of the relationship between leader and followers (LMX). As expected, conscientiousness and agreeableness were most consistently related to ethical leadership. In study 1, after controlling for the other personality traits, conscientiousness related positively with ethical leadership. In study 2, after controlling for other traits and LMX, conscientiousness related positively with ethical leadership and the behavior role clarification, and agreeableness with power sharing and fairness. Also, emotional stability related positively with ethical leadership and role clarification after controlling for LMX. As expected, openness to experience and extraversion were unrelated to ethical leader behaviors.

Key words

ethical leadership personality conscientiousness agreeableness emotional stability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, C., S.E. Spataro, and F.J. Flynn: 2008, ‘Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence’, Journal of Applied Psychology 93, 702-710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, E.: 2001, ‘Integrating leadership styles and ethical perspectives’, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 18, 244-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton, M. C., K. Lee, M. Perugini, P. Szarota, R. E., de Vries, L. Di Blas, et al.: 2004, ‘A six factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86, 356-366.Google Scholar
  4. Avolio, B.J., and W.L. Gardner: 2005, ‘Authentic leadership development’, Leadership Quarterly 16, 315-338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A.: 1986, ‘Social foundation of thought and action’, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Barling, J., A. Christie and N. Turner: 2008, ‘Pseudo-transformational leadership: Towards the development and test of a model’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, 851-861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bass, B. M., and P. Steidlmeier: 1999, ‘Ethics, character and authentic transformational leadership behavior’, Leadership Quarterly 10, 181-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, T. E.: 1998, ‘Integrity in organizations: beyond honesty and conscientiousness’, Academy of Management Review 23, 154-161.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, W.D.: 1993, ‘Understanding regression assumptions’, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bliese, P.D.: 2000, ‘Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis’, in K.J. Klein, and S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Bono, J.E., and T.A. Judge: 2004, ‘Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis’, Journal of Applied Psychology 89, 901-910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, M. E., and.L.K. Treviño: 2006, ‘Ethical leadership: A review and future directions’, Leadership Quarterly 17, 595-616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, M. E., L. K. Treviño, and D. A. Harrison: 2005, ‘Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97, 117-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, W.H.: 1981, ‘Ubiquitous Halo’, Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218-244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa, P. T., Jr., and R. R. McCrae: 1988, ‘Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on NEO Personality Inventory’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 853-863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa, P. T., Jr., and R. R. McCrae: 1992, ‘Four ways Five Factors are basic’, Personality Individual Differences 13, 653-665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa, P. T., Jr., R. R. McCrae, and D. A. Dye: 1991, ‘Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory’, Personality Individual Differences 12, 887-898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dasborough, MT., and N.M. Ashkanasy: 2002, ‘Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships’, Leadership Quarterly 13, 615-634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Hoogh, A. H. B., and D. N. Den Hartog: 2008, ‘Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study’, The Leadership Quarterly 19, 297-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Hoogh, A. H. B., and D. N. Den Hartog (2009) Ethical leadership: The positive and responsible use of power. In: D. Tjsovold and B. Van Knippenberg (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
  21. De Hoogh, A. H. B., D. N. Den Hartog, and P.L. Koopman: 2005, ‘Linking the Big Five-Factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 26, 839-865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Den Hartog, D. N., and A.H.B. De Hoogh: 2009, ‘Empowerment and leader fairness and integrity: Studying ethical leader behavior’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 18, 199-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dickson, M.W., D.B. Smith, M.W. Grojean, and M. Ehrhart: 2001, ‘An organizational climate regarding ethics: The outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them’, Leadership Quarterly 12, 197-217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Digman, J.M. 1990, ‘Personality structure: The emergence of the Five-Factor Model’, Annual Review of Psychology 41, 417-440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Digman, J.M.: 1997, ‘Higher-order factors of the Big Five’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, 1246-1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Digman, J.M., and A.C. Shmelyov: 1996, ‘The structure of temperament and personality in Russian children’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, 341-351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Engle, E.M., and R.G. Lord: 1997, ‘Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader–member exchange’, Academy of Management Journal 40, 988–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giberson, T.R., C.J. Resick, and M.W. Dickson: 2005, ‘Embedding leader characteristics: An examination of homogeneity of personality and values in organizations’, Journal of Applied Psychology 90, 1002-1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldberg, L.R.: 1990, ‘An alternative description of personality: The Big Five factor structure’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 1216-1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldberg, L. R.: 1999, ‘A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models’, in I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, and F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Goodstadt, B. E., and D. Kipnis: 1970, ‘Situational influences on the use of power’, Journal of Applied Psychology 54, 201-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graen, G. B., and M. Uhl-Bien: 1995, ‘Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective’, Leadership Quarterly 6, 219-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graziano, W.G., and N. Eisenberg: 1997, ‘Agreeableness: A dimension of personality’, in: Hogan, R., Johnson, J.A. and Briggs, S.R., Editors, 1997. Handbook of personality psychology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 795–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hendriks, A. A. J.: 1997, ‘The Construction of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  35. Hendriks, A.A.J., W.K.B. Hofstee, and B. De Raad: 1999, ‘The Five-Factor Inventory (FFPI)’, Personality and Individual Differences 27, 307-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hogan, R., G. J. Curphy, and J. Hogan: 1994, ‘What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality’, American Psychologist 49, 493-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. House, R. J.: 1996, ‘Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy and a reformulated theory’, Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler: 1999, ‘Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives’, Structural Equation Modeling 6, 1-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. International Personality Item Pool: 2007, ‘A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences’, Internet Web Site.
  40. James, L.R.: 1982, ‘Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement’, Journal of Applied Psychology 67, 219-229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. James, L.R., R.G. Demaree, and G. Wolf: 1984, ‘Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias’, Journal of Applied Psychology 69, 85-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jensen-Campbell, L.A., and W.G. Graziano: 2001, ‘Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict’, Journal of Personality 69, 323-362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Judge, T. A., and J. E. Bono: 2000, ‘Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership’, Journal of Applied Psychology 85, 751-765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Judge, T. A., and J. E. Bono: 2001, ‘Relationships between core-self-evaluations traits- self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control and emotional stability- with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis’, Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 80-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Judge, T. A., J. E. Bono, R. Ilies, and M. W. Gerhardt: 2002a, ‘Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review’, Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 765-780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Judge, T.A., A. Erez, J.E. Bono, and C.J. Thoresen: 2002b, ‘Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 693-710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Judge, T. A., A. E. M. Van Vianen, and I. E. De Pater: 2004, ‘Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research’, Human Performance 17, 325-346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kalshoven, K., and D.N. Den Hartog 2009, ‘Ethical leader behavior and leader effectiveness: The role of prototypicality and trust’, International Journal of Leadership Studies 5, 102-119. Google Scholar
  49. Kalshoven, K., D. N. Den Hartog and A. H. B. De Hoogh: in press, ‘Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (ELW): Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure’, Leadership Quarterly. Google Scholar
  50. Kanungo, R. N.: 2001, ‘Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders’, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 18, 257-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kanungo, R. N., and M. Mendonca: 2001, ‘Ethical leadership and governance in organizations: A preamble’, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 18, 241-243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lim, B.C., and R.E. Ployhart: 2004, ‘Transformational leadership: Relations to the Five-Factor Model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts’, Journal of Applied Psychology 89, 610-621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marcus B., S. Höft, and M. Riediger: 2006, ‘Integrity tests and the five-factor model of personality: A review and empirical test of two alternative positions’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment 14, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. May, D. R., A.Y.L. Chan, T. D. Hodges, and B. J. Avolio: 2003, ‘Developing the moral component of authentic leadership’, Organizational Dynamics 32, 247-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mayer, D. M., K. Aquino, R. L. Greenbaum and M. Kuenzi: 2008, Who Displays Ethical Leadership and Why Does It Matter? An Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership. Presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  56. Mayer, D.M., M. Kuenzi, R. Greenbaum, M. Bardes, and R. Salvador: 2009, ‘How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108, 1-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mayer, D.M., L. Nishii, B. Schneider, H. Goldstein: 2007, ‘The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences’, Personnel Psychology 60, 929-963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCrae, R.R., and P.T. Costa Jr.: 1987, ‘Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 81-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McCrae, R.R., and P.T. Costa Jr.: 1997, ‘Personality trait structure as a human universal’, The American Psychologist 52, 509 -516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moon, H. 2001: ‘The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas’, Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 533-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mount, M. K., and M. R. Barrick: 1995, ‘The Big Five Personality Dimensions: Implications for research and practice in Human Resources Management’, in (G. R. Ferris, Ed), Research in personnel and human resources management, JAI Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  62. Murphy, K.R. 1982: ‘Difficulties in the statistical control of Halo’, Journal of Applied Psychology 67, 161-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ones, D.S., C. Viswesvaran, and S. Dilchert: 2005, ‘Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions’, Human Performance 18, 389-404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piccolo, R., R. Greenbaum, D.N. Den Hartog, and R. Folger: 2010, ‘Task significance and job autonomy as motivational mechanisms in the ethical leadership process’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 31, 259-278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Resick, C. J., P. J. Hanges, M. W. Dickson, and J. K Mitchelson: 2006. ‘A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership’, Journal of Business Ethics 63, 345-359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rieke, M. L., and S. J. Guestello: 1995, ‘Unresolved issues in honesty and integrity testing’, American Psychologist 50, 458-459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sacket, P.R., and J.E. Wanek: 1996, ‘New development in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection’, Personnel Psychology 49, 787 - 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shamir, B., and G. Eilam, 2005: ‘What’s your story? A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development’, Leadership Quarterly 16, 395-417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sheppard, B.H., and R.J. Lewicki: 1987, ‘Toward general principles of managerial fairness’, Social Justice Research 1, 161-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shrout, P.E., and J.L. Fleiss: 1979, ‘Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability’, Psychological Bulletin 86, 420-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spangler, W. D., and R. J. House: 1991, ‘Presidential effectiveness and the leadership motive profile’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60, 439-455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sparrowe, R. T. 2005: ‘Authentic leadership and the narrative self’, The Leadership Quarterly 16, 419-439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tepper, B.J., M.K. Duffy, and J.D. Shaw: 2001, ‘Personality moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance’, Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 974-983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tett, R.P., and H.A. Guterman: 2000, ‘Situation trait relevance, trait expression and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation’, Journal of Research in Personality 34, 397-423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thoresen, C.J., J.C. Bradley, P.D. Bliese, and J.D. Thoresen: 2004, ‘The Big Five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages’, Journal of Applied Psychology 89, 835-853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Treviño, L. K., M. Brown and L. P. Hartman: 2003, ‘A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Executive Suite’, Human Relations 56, 5-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turner, N., J. Barling, O. Epitropaki, V. Butcher, and C. Milder: 2002, ‘Transformational leadership and moral reasoning’, Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 304-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walumbwa, F. O., and, J. Schaubroeck: 2009, ‘Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and workgroup psychological safety’, Journal of Applied Psychology 94, 1275-1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Witt, L.A., L.A. Burke, M.R Barrick, and M.K. Mount: 2002, ‘The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 164-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karianne Kalshoven
    • 1
  • Deanne N. Den Hartog
    • 2
  • Annebel H. B. De Hoogh
    • 3
  1. 1.Ethics InstituteUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementUniversity of Amsterdam Business SchoolAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Work and Organizational PsychologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations