Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Team Virtues and Performance: An Examination of Transparency, Behavioral Integrity, and Trust

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtue-based research in business ethics has increased over the last two decades, but most of the research has focused on the actions of an individual person. In this article, we examine the associations among team-level virtues using data from two studies. Specifically, we investigate whether transparency (usually thought to be an organizational- or collective-level construct), behavioral integrity (usually thought to be an individual-level construct), and trust (usually thought to be an individual-level construct) can be conceptualized and operate at the team level of analysis and, if so, what their relationships are to team performance. Using Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis, we found in both studies that team transparency was positively related to team behavioral integrity, which in turn was positively related to team trust. We also found evidence of a positive relationship between team trust and team performance. Implications of these findings for future teams and ethics research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audi, R. & Murphy, P.E.: 2006, The many faces of integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., Day, R. & Salas, E.: 2006, Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organization. Health Services Research, 41, 1576-1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkin, J. M.: 1999, How mass media simulate political transparency. Cultural Values, 3, 393–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R.: 1995, The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling, personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D.: 2000, Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R. M. and A. J. Smith: 2003, Transparency, Financial Accounting Information, and Corporate Governance. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=795547.

  • Cameron, K., Bright, D. & Caza, A.: 2004, Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 766-790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A.: 1979, Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caza, A., Barker, B. A. & Cameron, K.: 2004, Ethics and ethos: The buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 169-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D.: 1998, Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W.: 1998, Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, vii–xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R.: 1999, Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In Rick Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307-341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R.: 2005, Ethical character and virtue of organizations: An empirical assessment and strategic implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 269-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A.,: 2001, On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currall, S.C., & Inkpen, A.C.: 2002, A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 479-495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbish, L., & Kraut, R.: 2008, Awareness displays and social motivation for coordinating communication. Information Systems Research, 19, 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., & Yammarino, F. J.: 1984, Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Work Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring and Effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C.: 2006, Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenships and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 622-635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K.T., & Ferrin, D.L.: 2002, Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, A. and S. Helm: 2003, `Exploring the Impact of Relationship Transparency on Business Relationships: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Purchasing Managers in Germany', Industrial Marketing Management 32, 101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F.: 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gully, S. M.; Incalcaterra, K. A.; Joshi, A.; Beaubien, J. M.: 2002) A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R.A. & Dickson, M.W.: 1996, Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D.A. & Jones, L.M.: 2005, Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 509-522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M. & Shea, C.M.: 2006, Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31, 180-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L.R., Demaree, R.J., & Wolf, G.: 1993, rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, M.C. & Hanges, P.J.: 2002, Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 916-928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J.: 1994, Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 195-229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Klein, K. J.: 2000, A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y.: 2007, Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 59-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1984) After virtue. (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D.: 1995, An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.C., & Gavin, M.B.: 2005, Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874-888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, P.E.: 1972, The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P.E., Laczniak, G.R., & Wood, G.: 2007, An ethical basis for relationship marketing: a virtue ethics perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 37-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M.E., & Yammarino, F.J. : 2007, Integrity and leadership: Clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25, 171-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M.E., & Yammarino, F.J. : 2009, Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 405-420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L. & Karren, R.J.: 2009, An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group & Organization Management, 34, 479-504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., S. Wende and A. Will: 2005, Smart PLS 2.0. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Schminke, M., Wells, D., Peyrefitte, J., & Sebora, T.C.: 2002, Leadership and ethics in work groups: A longitudinal assessment. Group & Organization Management, 27, 272-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. L.: 2002, Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T.L., Friedman, R., Liu. L.A., & McLean-Parks, J.: 2007, Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among black and non-black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 650-665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C.: 2003, Victim of circumstances? A defense of virtue ethics in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 43-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosik, J., Kahai, S., & Piovoso, M.: 2009, Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? A primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in group and organization research. Group & Organization Management, 34, 5-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R., & Carrese Gerbasi, K.: 1972, Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L.J., Edwards, J.R., & Vandenberg, R.J.: 2003, Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29, 903-926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F.J., Dionne, S.D., Chun, J.U., & Dansereau, F.: 2005,Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 879-919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, U.S.A.

    Michael E. Palanski

  2. State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, U.S.A.

    Surinder S. Kahai & Francis J. Yammarino

Authors
  1. Michael E. Palanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Surinder S. Kahai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francis J. Yammarino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Palanski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palanski, M.E., Kahai, S.S. & Yammarino, F.J. Team Virtues and Performance: An Examination of Transparency, Behavioral Integrity, and Trust. J Bus Ethics 99, 201–216 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation