Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there are growing bodies of research examining both the differences between strongly and poorly socially performing firms, and the impact of firm leaders on other strategic outcomes, little has been done in examining the effect of firm leaders on corporate social performance (CSP). This study directly addresses this issue by using upper echelon theory, and the KLD Research Analytics CSP ratings, to show that observable CEO characteristics predict differences in CSP between firms, even when firm and industry characteristics are controlled for. Using a sample of 650 public US firms I find that strong or exemplary CSP, as measured by the strengths categories of KLD’s ratings, is positively related to the CEO having a bachelor’s degree in humanities, having a breadth of career experience and being female. I find that KLD strength ratings are negatively related to the CEO having a bachelor’s degree in economics and to their level of short-term compensation. Preliminary tests of causality support the assertion that these effects reflect CEO discretion rather than being an artifact of reverse causality. Significant relationships between the CEO characteristics and poor social performance as measured by the concerns categories of KLD’s ratings are not found. This suggests that CEOs have more discretion in influencing strong and exemplary social performance than in impacting poor CSP. Implications, particularly for economics education, are discussed. While there are many fruitful directions for future research, the benefits and challenges to conducting similar studies in other countries is focused upon to correspond to the global nature of this special issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arce, M. D. G.: 2004, ‘Conspicuous By Its Absence: Ethics and Managerial Economics’, Journal of Business Ethics 54, pp. 261-277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P.: 2005, ‘Evolving Sustainably: A longitudinal study of Corporate Sustainable Development’, Strategic Management Journal 26, pp. 197-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker II, V. L. and Mueller, G. C.: 2002, ‘CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending’, Management Science 48(6), pp. 782-801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenbeim, R. E.: 2006, ‘Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Vital Speeches of the Day 72 (16/17), pp. 501 – 503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L. et al.: 1999, ‘Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal 42 (5), pp. 488-506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C. et al.: 1999, ‘The Impact of Personality on Behavior in Five Prisoner’s Dilemma Games’, Journal of Economic Psychology 20, pp. 343-377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracke, R. et al.: 2007, ‘What Distinguishes EMAS Participants? An Exploration of Company Characteristics’ Working Paper No. 37 Presented at FEEM. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=981131.

  • Bromley, D.: 1990, ‘The ideology of efficiency; searching for a theory of policy analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economic management 19, pp. 86-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., P. K. Travedi (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A. et al.: 2004, ‘Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition’, Journal of Management 30(6), pp. 749-778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review 4, pp. 497-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K. et al. (2009) How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18(1), 125–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., March, J. G.: (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K. and Guthrie, J. P.: 1994, ‘Executive Succession: Organizational Antecedents of CEO Characteristics’, Strategic Management Journal 15(7) pp. 569-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1973, ‘The Case for and against Business assumption of Social Responsibilities’, Academy of Management Journal 16, pp. 312-322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H. et al.: 1997, ‘Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management’, Academy of Management Review 22 (1), pp. 20-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn, D. C. and Simon, H. A.: 1958, ‘Selective Perception: A Note on the Departmental Identification of Executives’, Sociometry 21(2), pp. 140-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzion, D.: 2007, ‘Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992 - Present: A Review’, Journal of Management 33(4), pp. 637-664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, B. and Schultz, G. G.: 2000, ‘Does Economics Make Citizens Corrupt?’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43, pp. 101-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. et al.: 1993a, ‘Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(2), pp. 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. R.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective, (Pitman Publishing Inc., Massachusetts and London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. et al. (1993) Economics Indoctrination or Selection? Some Empirical Results. Journal of Economics Education 24, 271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 122–126.

  • Ghoshal, G., et al. (1999) A New Manifesto for Management. Sloan Management Review 40: 9-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J.: 2005, ‘Corporate responsibility and economic theory: an anthropological perspective’, International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(4), pp. 302-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B. and Waddock, S. A.: 1994, ‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance,’ Academy of Management Journal 37(4), pp. 1034-1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J. and Mahon, J. F.: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research’, Business & Society 36(1), pp. 5-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C.: 2007, ‘Upper Echelons Theory: An Update’, Academy of Management Review 32(2), pp. 334-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. and Finkelstein, S.: 1987, ‘Managerial Discretion: A Bridge Between Polar Views of Organizational Outcomes’, Research in Organizational Behavior 9, pp. 369-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. and Fukutomi, G. D. S.: 1991, ‘The seasons of a CEOs’ tenure’, Academy of Management Review 16, pp. 719-942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A.: 1984, ‘Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers’, Academy of Management Review 9, pp. 193-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A. and Maclagan, P. W.: 2004, ‘Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 50, pp. 33-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review 20(2), pp. 404-437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. et al.: 1990, Graduate Business Education and the Moral Development of MBA Students: Theory and Preliminary Results, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting to the International Association of Business and Society (San Diego, CA).

  • Kahneman, D. et al.: 1986, ‘Fairness as a Constraint on profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market’, The American Economic Review 76(4), pp. 728-741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, J. W.: 1998, ‘Emotion As Well As Reason: Getting Students Beyond “Interpersonal Accountability”‘, Journal of Business Ethics 17, pp. 295 – 308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langtry, B.: 1994, ‘Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), pp. 431 – 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. and O’Connor, J. F.: 1972, ‘Leadership and Organizational Performance: A Study of Large Corporations’, American Sociological Review 37(2), pp. 117-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. S. and Thorne, L.: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Long-Term Compensation: Evidence from Canada’, Journal of Business Ethics 57, pp.241-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Simon, H. A.: 1991, Organizations, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P.: 2001, People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey and London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G. and Ames, R.: 1981, ‘Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else?: Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods’, Journal of Public Economics 15(3), pp. 295-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. et al.: 2003, ‘CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 45(4), pp.341-359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, K.: 2001, ‘The Other Objective of Ethics Education: Re-humanising the Accounting Profession – A Study of Ethics Education in Law, Engineering, Medicine and Accountancy’, Journal of Business Ethics 34(3/4), pp. 279-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D.: 2000, ‘Corporate social responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?’, Strategic Management Journal 21(5), pp. 603-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D.: 2001, ‘Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’, The Academy of Management Review 26(1), pp. 117-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. et al.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications’, Journal of Management Studies 43(1), pp. 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. et al.: 1982, ‘Top Executive Locus of Control and its Relationship to Strategy Making, Structure and Environment’, Academy of Management Journal 25, pp. 237-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.: 2005, ‘Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal’, Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1), pp. 96-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J. and De Leon, P.: 2005, ‘Chief Executive Officers and Voluntary Environmental Performance: Costa Rica’s Certification for Sustainable Tourism’, Policy Science 38, pp. 107-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. and Ockenfels, A.: 1998, ‘An experimental solidarity game’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34, pp. 517-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1979, ‘A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns’, Academy of Management Review 4, pp. 63-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M.: 1996, ‘The Construct Validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini Social Performance Ratings Data’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(3), pp. 287-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1979, ‘Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations’, The American Economic Review 69(4), pp. 493-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W.: 2007, Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd ed. (Pearson Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L.: 2008, ‘Top Managers as Drivers for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. S. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 227–248 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

  • Thomas, A. S., and Simerlym R. L.: 1995, ‘Internal Determinants of Corporate Social Performance: The Role of Top Managers’, Academy of Management Proceedings, pp. 411–415.

  • Tschopp, D. J.: 2005, `Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparison Between the United States and the European Union', Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12, 55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.: 2005, The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, (R. R. Donnelley, Harrisonburg, Virginia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.: 2003, ‘Myths and Realities of Social Investing’, Organization & Environment 16(3), pp. 369-380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B.: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), pp. 303-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A. and Siegel, D. S.: 2008, ‘Defining the socially responsible leader’, The Leadership Quarterly 19, pp. 117-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A. et al.: 2006a, ‘Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Management Studies 43(8), pp. 1703-1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A. et al.: 2006b, ‘Cultural and Leadership predictors of CSR values of Top management. A Global Study of 15 Countries’, Journal of International Business Studies 37, pp. 823-837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J. L.: 2007, ‘The Impact of Corporate Governance on Environmental Strategy’, Doctoral Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

  • Walls, J. L., et al.: 2008, Assessment of the Construct Validity of Environmental Strategy Measures, Paper Series 1105 Presented at Ross School of Business, May.

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), pp. 691-718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 12 Waters Edge Road, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12590, U.S.A.

    Mikko H. Manner

Authors
  1. Mikko H. Manner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikko H. Manner.

Additional information

An abbreviated version of this article has been published as a chapter in ‘Carla C. J. M. Millar and Eve Poole, Ethical Leadership’, published 2010, Palgrave Macmillan; reproduced with permission of Palgrave Macmillan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manner, M.H. The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance. J Bus Ethics 93 (Suppl 1), 53–72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0626-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0626-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation