Skip to main content
Log in

Fair Trade Organizations in Belgium: Unity in Diversity?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the dual process occurring in the field of Fair Trade organizations (FTOs) in Belgium. On the one hand, there has been a gradual diversification of the organizational landscape over time from pioneering volunteer-based non-profit organizations to a broader array including cooperatives, group structures, businesses and individual entrepreneurs exclusively devoted to FT. On the other hand, a process of networking is currently taking place among the various types of FTOs in the context of the creation of a Belgian Fair Trade Federation (BFTF). Drawing on neo-institutional theory, including institutional entrepreneurship, this article examines how and why these two processes have taken place. A qualitative field study in the Belgian FT sector, including interviews with 15 FTOs, offers rich empirical material which illustrates the diverse patterns of these organizations. Based on the observed combinations of different variables among Belgian FTOs, a taxonomy reflecting diverse means of conceiving and organizing FT activity is suggested. The different categories of FTOs and the evolution of these categories over time seem linked to the broader institutional evolutions of FT at the international as well as at the Belgian level. Finally, several factors are reviewed to explain why the diversity among Belgian FTOs has not been an obstacle to their collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson M., 2009. NGOs and Fair Trade: The Social Movement Behind the Label. In: NGOs in Contemporary Britain: Non-state Actors in Society and Politics since 1945 (Crowson N., Hilton M., McKay J. eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, J. and A. Carimentrand: 2008. La transformation du commerce équitable: de l’éthique relationnelle à l’éthique informationnelle, in 3ième colloque RIODD: Responsabilité sociale et environnementale, nouvelles formes organisationnelles, Lyon, 6–8 Juin 2008.

  • Battilana J., D’Aunno T., 2009. Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In: Institutional Work (Lawrence T.B., Suddaby R., Leca B. eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezençon, V. and S. Blili: 2009, ‘Fair Trade Managerial Practices: Strategy, Organisation and Engagement’, Journal of Business Ethics 90(1), 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biélande, P.: 2005, Le Fairtrade sera-t-il victime de son succès ? Alter Business News, Vol. 100.

  • Biélande, P.: 2006, ‘Citizen Dream: expérience de distribution des produits équitables issus de l’artisanat par une petite entreprise’, 2th Fair Trade International Symposium, Montreal, 19–21 June 2006.

  • BTC-CTB, IPSOS: 2008. Perception du commerce équitable (Fair Trade Centre – Coopération Technique Belge, Bruxelles).

  • Charlier S., Haynes I., Bach A., Mayet A., Yepez del Castillo I., Mormont M., 2007. Fair trade facing new commercial challenges: evolution of the actors’ dynamics, Belgian Science Policy, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth C., 2004. The Governance of Cooperatives and Mutual Associations: a Paradox Perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75 (1), 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, E. and D. Reed: 2009, ‘Fair Trade: A Model for International Co-Operation Among Co-Operatives?’, in D. Reed and J. J. McMurtry (eds.), Co-Operatives in a Global Economy: The Challenges of Co-Operation Across Borders (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne).

  • Dart R., 2004. The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14 (4), 411-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. A. and A. Crane: 2003, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Fair Trade Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 45, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker P., Driesen L., Rayp G., 2005. Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness-to-pay for Fair Trade Coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39 (2), 363-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees J.G., 2001, The Meaning of “Social Entrepreneurship” The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Develtere, P. and I. Pollet: 2005, ‘Co-Operatives and Fair Trade’, Background Paper Commissioned by the Committee for the Promotion and Advancement of Cooperatives (COPAC) for the COPAC Open Forum on Fair Trade and Cooperatives, Berlin, February 2005.

  • DiMaggio, P.: 1988, ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’, in L. G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48(2), 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty B., Tranchell S., 2007. “Radical mainstreaming” of fairtrade: the case of The Day Chocolate Company. Equal Opportunities International, 26 (7), 693-711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, S.: 1999, Institutional Entrepreneurs. Engineers, Catalysts, and Innovators. In Academy of Management Conference, Chicago.

  • Gendron C., 2004. Le commerce équitable: un nouveau mouvement socio-économique au coeur d’une autre mondialisation. In: Altermondialisation, économie et coopération internationale (Favreau L., Larose G., Salam Fall A. eds.), Karthala, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron C., Bisaillon V., Rance A., 2009a. The Institutionalization of Fair Trade: More than Just a Degraded Form of Social Action. Journal of Business Ethics, 86 (0), 63-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron C., Palma Torres A., Bisaillon V., 2009b. Quel commerce équitable pour demain? Pour une nouvelle gouvernance des échanges, Ecosociété & Charles Léopold Mayer, Montréal & Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • González A.A., Doppler F., 2006. El Comercio Justo: entre la institucionalización y la confianza. Problemas de Desarrollo, 38 (149), 181-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier P., 2006. Social Entrepreneurship: Agency in a Globalizing World. In: Social Entrepreneurship. New Models of Sustainable Social Change (Nicholls A. ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 119-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui B., 1987. Productive Private Nonprofit Organizations. A Conceptual Framework. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 58 (4), 415-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann H., 1999. Cooperative Firms in Theory and Practice. Finish Journal of Business Economics, 4, 387-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinings C.R., Greenwood R., Reay T., Suddaby R., 2004. Dynamics of Change in Organizational Fields. In: Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation (Van de Ven A., Poole M.S. eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts, B.: 2007, The Governance of Fair Trade Organizations. A Focus on Stakeholders. Representation. HEC Working Paper, 2007/06/02.

  • Huybrechts B., 2009. Explaining Organisational Diversity in Fair Trade Social Enterprises, HEC Management School, University of Liège, Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang H., Powell W.W., 2005. Institutions and Entrepreneurship. In: The Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Alvarez S.A., Agarwal R., Sorenson O. eds.), Springer Science, Boston, pp. 179-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson R.L., 1991. Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism. In: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Powell W.W., DiMaggio P.J. eds.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz M.S., Block E.S., 2008. Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism. In: Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Greenwood R., Oliver C., Suddaby R., Sahlin-Andersson K. eds.), Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krier J.-M., 2005. Fair Trade in Europe 2005: facts and figures on Fair Trade in 25 European countries, Brussels.

  • Krier J.-M., 2008. Fair Trade 2007: New Facts and Figures from an ongoing Success Story, Dutch Association of Worldshops, Culemborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence T.B., Suddaby R., 2006. Institutions and Institutional Work. In: The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (Clegg S.R., Hardy C., Lawrence T.B., Nord W.R. eds.), Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leca B., Battilana J., Boxenbaum E., 2008. Agency and Institutions: A Review of Institutional Entrepreneurship, Harvard Business School, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClair M.S., 2002. Fighting the Tide: Alternative Trade Organizations in the Era of Global Free Trade. World Development, 30 (6), 949-958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévesque B., 2004. Commerce équitable et économie sociale : une convergence qui s’impose. In: Commerce équitable et économie sociale : le défi de construire un réseau (Huot G., Proulx L. eds.), Cahiers de l’ARUC, Cahiers de l’ARUC, Collection Transfert, Montréal, pp. 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littrell M.A., Dickson M.A., 1997. Alternative Trading Organizations: Shifting Paradigm in a Culture of Social Responsibility. Human Organization, 56 (3), 344-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low W., Davenport E., 2005. Postcards from the edge: Maintaining the ‘alternative’ character of fair trade. Sustainable Development, 13, 143-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T.B., 2004. Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657-679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair J., Marti I., 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41 (1), 36-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J.W., Rowan B., 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G., 2004. The Fair Trade movement: parameters, issues and future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 53 (1), 73-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., R. Slack and J. Gibbon: 2009, ‘Criteria for Responsible Business Practice in SMEs. An Exploratory Case of U.K. Fair Trade Organisations’, Journal of Business Ethics 89(2), 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls A., Cho A.H., 2006. Social Entrepreneurship: The Structuration of a Field. In: Social Entrepreneurship. New Models of Sustainable Change (Nicholls A. ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 99-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls A., Opal C., 2005. Fair Trade. Market-driven Ethical Consumption, (Sage Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Özçağlar-Toulouse, N., A. Béji-Bécheur, M. Gateau and P. Robert-Demontrond: 2010, ‘Demystifying Fair Trade in France: The History of an Ambiguous Project’, Journal of Business Ethics, Special Issue on Fair Trade in Different National Contexts, doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0579-x.

  • Pleyers, G.: 2005, ‘Commerce équitable et mouvement altermondialiste’, Hémisphères 29, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncelet M., Defourny J., De Pelsmacker P., 2005. A fair and sustainable trade, between market and solidarity: diagnosis and prospects, Belgian Science Policy, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poos S., 2008. Le commerce équitable en 2008, Fair Trade Centre - Coopération Technique Belge, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell W.W., P. DiMaggio: 1991. Introduction. In: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Powell W.W. and DiMaggio P. eds.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds L.T., Long M.A., 2007. Fair/Alternative Trade: historical and empirical dimensions. In: Fair Trade. The challenges of transforming globalization (Raynolds L.T., Murray D.L., Wilkinson J. eds.), Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed D., 2009. What do Corporations have to do with Fair Trade? Positive and Normative Analysis from a Value Chain Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86 (0), 3-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed D., McMurtry J.J. eds, 2009, Co-operatives in a Global Economy: The Challenges of Co-operation Across Borders. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard M.-C., 2003. Fair trade: quality, market and conventions. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 87-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAW-B: 2008, Commerce équitable d’artisanat. Quels outils pour développer le secteur? Une recherche-action de SAW-B avec le soutien du Ministre de l’Economie, de l’Emploi, du Commerce extérieur et du Patrimoine de la Région wallonne, Namur.

  • Scott, R. W.: 1991, ‘Unpacking Institutional Arrangements’, in W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

  • Scott, W.: 2008, ‘Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory’, Theory and Society 37(5), 427–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott R.W., Meyer J.W., 1991. The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence. In: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Powell W.W., DiMaggio P. eds.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear R., 2000. The Co-operative advantage. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71 (4), 507-523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman M.C., 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571-610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert P.S., Zucker L.G., 1996. The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. In: Studying Organization. Theory & Method (Clegg S.R., Hardy C. eds.), Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B.: 2002, ‘The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change’, Academy of Management Journal 45, 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson J., 2007. Fair Trade: Dynamic and Dilemmas of a Market Oriented Global Social Movement. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30 (3), 219-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Huybrechts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huybrechts, B. Fair Trade Organizations in Belgium: Unity in Diversity?. J Bus Ethics 92 (Suppl 2), 217–240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0580-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0580-4

Keywords

Navigation