Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumer Support for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Religion and Values

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical behavior among businesses has gained significant prominence in recent years. Survey evidence shows that Asian consumers demand for greater social responsibility among businesses. Thus, a deeper understanding of the factors that contribute to such a demand is useful. This study examines the influence of religiosity and values on corporate social responsibility (CSR) support among consumers in Hong Kong and Singapore. Primary data collected among consumers in these cities point to a significant direct relationship between religiosity and CSR support. In Hong Kong, this attitude is due both to altruistic as well as for egotistical (or face saving) reasons. In Singapore, this is mainly due to the latter. The results imply that different motivations should guide CSR strategies in these two cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agle, B. R. and Van Buren, H. (1999), “God and Mammon: The Modern Relationship.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 563-582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. and Ross, J.M. (1967), “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5, 432-443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. and J. Cavanagh: 2000, ‘Report on the Top 200 Corporations’, http://www.corporations.org/system/top100.html.

  • Angelidis, J. and Ibrahim, N. (2004), “An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Degree of Religiousness upon an Individual’s Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation”, Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 119-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah-Adu, K. (1998), “Market orientation and performance: empirical test in a transition economy”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6, pp. 25-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R. L., Diaz-Loving, R., Gollwitzer, P. M., Davis, M. H. and Foushee, H. C., (1981), “The Roll of Dispositional Empathy and Social Evaluation in Empathic Mediation of Helping”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 786-796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basil, D. Z. and Weber, D. (2006), “Values Motivation and Concern for Appearances: The Effect of Personality Traits on Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility”, International Journal of Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 61-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M. (2000), “Recovering Religion’s Prophetic Voice for Business Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1979), “A Three-dimensional Model of Corporate Performance.” Academy of Management Review, 44, 497-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Culture Connection. (1987), “Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-free Dimensions of Culture”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2): 143-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.W. and Dawson, L.E. (1996), “Personal Religiousness and Ethical Judgments: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, 15 (3), 359-372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E. G., M. Snyder, R. G. Ridge and J. Copeland: 1998, ‘Understanding and Assessing the Motivation of Volunteers: A Functional Approach’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6): 1516–1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. M. (2002), “Religion and Business – The Critical Role of Religious Traditions in Management Education”, Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup International: 2005, ‘The Voice of the People Survey’, www.gallup-international.com.

  • Golden, B. (1992), “SBU strategy and performance: the moderating effects of the corporate-SBU relationship”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 145-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., Kaptein, M. and Mazereeuw, C. (2007), “Conceptions of God, Normative Convictions, and Socially Responsible Business Conduct: An Explorative Study Among Executives “, Business and Society, 46, 331-369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis 5th Edition, London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A. and Maclagan, P. W. (2004), “Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, T. E.: 1988, ‘In the World but not of the World: Religious, Alienation, and Philosophy of Human Nature among Bible College and Liberal Arts College Students’, Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

  • Johnston, J. (1972) Econometrics Method 5th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K.C. and Shi, G. (2008), “Factors Affecting Ethical Attitudes in Mainland China and Hong Kong”, Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 463-479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, T. K. P. and R. Y. Chan: 2003, ‘Face, Favour and Positioning – A Chinese Power Game’, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (11/12): 1575-1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magill, G. (1992), “Theology in Business Ethics: Appealing to the Religious Imagination”, Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 129-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahtani, S. and Leo, K. (2007), Corporate Social Responsibility in Kong Kong: A Survey of Good Practice 2007, Community Business Limited, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. (2001), “Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Cross Cultural Perception”, Journal of Business Ethics, 30 (1), 57-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, O.A.J. (1995), “Exonerating Unethical Marketing Executive Behaviours: A Diagnostic Framework”, Journal of Marketing, 59 (April): 43-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S.W. and Burnett, J.J. (1990), “Consumer Religiousness and Retail Store Evaluative Criteria”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 101-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, C. W. and Zimmerer, T. W., (1985), “Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes’, Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 175-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2001), “Business Social Responsibility: A Source of Social Capital?”, Reason in Practice, 1(3), 35-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, M.J., and McQuarrie, E.F. (1988), ‘Shortening the Rokeach Value for Use in Consumer Research’, Advances in Consumer Research, 5(1), 381-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M. L. (2003), “Searching for Spirituality in All the Wrong Places” Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 393-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Centre: 2007, ‘The Pew Global Attitudes Survey’, www.pewresearch.org.

  • Phau, I. and Kea, G. (2007), “Attitudes if Students towards Business Ethics: A Cross National Investigation of Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong”, Journal of Business Ethics, 72 (1), 61-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, B. and M. Yeung: 2008, ‘Chinese Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9825-x.

  • Ramasamy, B., Goh, K.W., and Yeung, M. (2006). Is Guanxi a Bridge to Knowledge Transfer? Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59 (1), 130-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1969), “Value Systems and Religion”, Review of Religious Research, 11, 2–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson, D. (2002), “Organisational Behaviour: An Integrated Approach, Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V. and Dernelle, R. (2004), “Values and Religiosity: a Meta-analysis of Studies Using Schwartz’s Model”, Personality and Individual Differences, 37: 721-734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992), ‘Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries’, in M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, San Diego), 1-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. and Huismans, S. (1995), “Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Marta, J.K., Rallapalli, K.C. and Rao, C.P. (2000), “Towards an Understanding of Religiousness and Marketing Ethics: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Business Ethics, 27 (4), 305-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siu, N.Y.M., Dickinson, J.R. and Lee, B.Y.Y. (2000), “Ethical Evaluation of Business Activities and Personal Religiousness”, Teaching Business Ethics, 4, 239 – 249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, E.K.R. (2008), “Keeping God in Place: The Management of Religion in Singapore”, in A.E. Lai (ed.), Religious Diversity in Singapore, Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarakeshwar, N., Swank, A. B., Pargament, K. I., and Mahoney, A. (2001). “The Sanctification of Nature and Theological Conservatism: A Study of Opposing Religious Correlates of Environmentalism”. Review of Religious Research, 42, 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. (1998), “A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Social Reporting in Singapore: The Case of the Banking, Food and Beverages and Hotel Industries”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11 (5): 624–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, M. (2004) A Guide to Modern Econometrics 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., Bing, M.N., Davison, H.K., Ammeter, A.P., Garner, B.L. and Novicevis, M.M. (2008), “Religiosity and Moral Identify: The Mediating Role of Self Control”, Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 601-613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. and Singh, J. J. (2005), “Religiosity and Consumer Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 175-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Singh, J. J. and Paolillo, J. (2007), “Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs: The Roles of Money, Religiosity and Attitude Towards Business”, Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 369-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelvang, B. (2005) Econometrics: Theory and Applications with Eviews, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G.R. and Agle, B.R. (2002), “Religiosity and Ethical Behavior in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 77-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, C.: 2007, ‘A Human Development View on Value Change’, World Value Survey. http://margaux.grandvinum.se/SebTest/wvs/articles/folder_published/article_base_83.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Europe International Business School, Shanghai, China

    Bala Ramasamy

  2. The Open University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Matthew C. H. Yeung & Alan K. M. Au

Authors
  1. Bala Ramasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew C. H. Yeung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alan K. M. Au
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bala Ramasamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M.C.H. & Au, A.K.M. Consumer Support for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Religion and Values. J Bus Ethics 91 (Suppl 1), 61–72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0568-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0568-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation