Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 39–65 | Cite as

Multinational Oil Companies and the Adoption of Sustainable Development: A Resource-Based and Institutional Theory Interpretation of Adoption Heterogeneity

Article

Abstract

Sustainable development is often framed as a social issue to which corporations should pay attention because it offers both opportunities and challenges. Through the use of institutional theory and the resource-based view of the firm, we shed some light on why, more than 20 years after sustainable development was first introduced, we see neither the adoption of this business model as dominant nor its converse, that is the total abandonment of the model as unworkable and unprofitable. We focus on multinational corporations (MNCs) because they were among the organizations first called to take action. In order to illustrate the institutional pressures MNCs face and their strategic response to these pressures, we analysed four major oil and gas multinationals subject to similar sustainable development pressures – climate change, biodiversity, renewable energy development and social investment. We argue that normative and coercive isomorphism does not occur at the global level because sustainable development is largely a stakeholder-driven rather than a broad social pressure. That is, host country interpretation of sustainable development pressures varies across an MNC’s subsidiary network. Based on the analysis of the four major MNCs’ annual reports from 2000 to 2005, we argue that mimetic isomorphism may occur, but since it implies the use of complex and intangible resources, mimetic processes are slow, rare and discretionary.

Keywords

sustainable development multinational corporations business strategy resource-based view institutional theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. and Hambrick, D. C.: 1997, ‘Attentional homogeneity in industries: The effect of discretion’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(7), 513-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansoff, H.: 1979, The changing shape of the strategic problem. In: D. E. Schendel and C. W. Hofer (eds), Strategic Management. A New View of Business Policy and Planning. Little, Brown & Company, Boston, pp. 23-44.Google Scholar
  3. Arora, S. and Cason, T.: 1995, ‘An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in epa’s 33/50 program’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 271-286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansal, P. (2005) Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26(3):197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, G., G. Smith, F. Vacas, E. Swingholm, R. Yuill and M. Aleman: 1997, ‘Managing Nontechnical Risks Associated with Seismic Operations in the Tropical Rain Forest of Ecuador’, Oil & Gas Journal 95(16), 50–60.Google Scholar
  6. Barney, J. B.: 1991, ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barney, J.: 2001, ‘Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten year retrospective on the resource-based view’, Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barney, J.: 2002, Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (Prentice Hall: New Jersey).Google Scholar
  9. Barrera-Hernandez, L., Lucas, A., McCoy, E. and McCready, J.: 2000, Energy and environmental law in latin america & the caribbean: Legislative inventory & analysis.. (OLADE, University of Calgary, CIDA: Quito).Google Scholar
  10. Barret, S.: 1991, ‘Environmental regulation for competitive advantage’, Business Strategy Review, 2(1), 1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beardsley, T.: 1988, ‘Winds of change’, Scientific American, 259(3), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bettman, J. R. and Weitz, B. A.: 1983, ‘Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 165-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buysse, K. and Verbeke, A.: 2003, ‘Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective’, Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, A.: 1979, ‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaffee, E. E.: 1985, ‘Three models of strategy’, Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, M. J. and Hambrick, D.: 1995, ‘Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453-482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christmann, P.: 2000, ‘Effects of “Best practices” Of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarkson, M. E.: 1995, ‘A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collis, D. and Montgomery, C.: 1995, ‘Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s.’, Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118-130.Google Scholar
  20. Cormier, D., I. Gordon and M. Magnan: 2004, Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management’s perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 143-165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dierickx, I. and Cool, K.: 1989, ‘Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage: Reply’, Management Science, 35(12), 1514-1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W.: 1983, ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dirsmith, M. W. and Covaleski, M. A.: 1983, ‘Strategy, external communication and environmental context’, Strategic Management Journal, 4(2), 137-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duriau, V., Reger, R. and Pfarrer, M.: 2007, ‘A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements’, Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elkington J. (1998) Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society, Stony Creek, CT.Google Scholar
  26. ENDS: 2008, ‘EU Makes Economic Case to Halt ‘Unprecedented’ Rate of Biodiversity Loss’, ENDS (Environmental Data Services), (401), 54–56.Google Scholar
  27. Fiol, M.: 1995, ‘Corporate communications: Comparing executives’ private and public statements’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 522-537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foreign Affairs: 2008, ‘Winds of change’, Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 8-9.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, R., E: 1984, Strategic management: Stakeholder approach (Pitman: Boston).Google Scholar
  30. Gjertsen, H. and Barrett, C. B.: 2004, ‘Context-dependent biodiversity conservation management regimes: Theory and simulation’, Land Economics, 80(3), 323-339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J. and Krause, T.-S.: 1995, ‘Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research’, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874-907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grant, R.: 1991, ‘The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation’, California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.Google Scholar
  33. Grigg, A.: 2007, ‘Biodiversity and the Extractive Industry: Innovative Practices and Remaining Challenges’, Greener Management International, (52), 63–76.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, R.: 1992, ‘The strategic analysis of intangible resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall, R.: 1993, ‘A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 14(13), 607-618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall, J. and Vredenburg, H.: 2003, ‘The challenges of sustainable development innovation’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 61-68.Google Scholar
  37. Hart, S.: 1995, ‘A natural resource-based-view of the firm’, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hart, S.: 1997, ‘Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world’, Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66-76.Google Scholar
  39. Hart, S. and Ahuja, G.: 1996, ‘Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hart, S. and Milstein, M.: 2003, ‘Creating sustainable value’, Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56-69.Google Scholar
  41. Hart, S. and Sharma, S.: 2004, ‘Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination’, Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7-18.Google Scholar
  42. Hawken, P. (1994) The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. HarperBusiness, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  43. Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P.: 1996, ‘The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P.: 1999, ‘The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance’, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hinings, B. and Greenwood, R.: 1988,The normative prescription of organizations, in Zucker, Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  46. Higginson, N. and H. Vredenburg: 2010, `Collaborating for Sustainability: Strategic Knowledge Networks, Natural Resource Management and Regional Development', International Journal of Sustainable Economy 2(3), 334–352.Google Scholar
  47. Hoffman A. (2001) From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. Stanford Business Books, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  48. Idahosa, P.: 2002, ‘Business ethics and development in conflict (zones): The case of talisman oil’, Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 227-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. International Energy Agency: 2005, Key World Energy Statistics: International Energy Agency Google Scholar
  50. International Organization for Standardization: 2009, Iso Survey 2008Principal Findings (ISO, Geneva), www.Iso.Org/iso/survey2008.Pdf. Accessed 16 April 2010.
  51. Jauch, L., Osborn, R. and Martin, T.: 1980, ‘Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method for organizational research’, The Academy of Management Review 5(4), 517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kabanoff, B. and Brown, S. (2008) Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders: Content, structure, stability, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. King, A. and Lenox, M.: 2000, ‘Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698-716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Klassen, R. and McLaughin, C., P: 1996, ‘The impact of environmental management on firm performance’, Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Knott, D.: 1997, ‘Royal Dutch/Shell Reinventing Itself as Total Energy Company’, Oil & Gas Journal 95(97), 29–36.Google Scholar
  56. Kolk A., Walhain S., Wateringen, S. v. d.: 2001, ‘Environmental reporting by the fortune global 250: Exploring the influence of nationality and sector’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kondra, A. and Hinings, C.: 1998, ‘Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory’, Organization Studies, 19(5), 743-767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Konrad, A., Steurer, R., Langer, M. and Martinuzzi, A.: 2006, ‘Empirical findings on business–society relations in Europe’, Journal of Business Ethics, 63(1), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Krauss, C. and J. A. D. Mouawad: 2009, ‘Oil Industry is Stressing Cooperation on Climate’, New York Times, p. 3.Google Scholar
  60. LaGrega, M., P. Buckingham, J. Evans (1994). Hazardous Waste Management. McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  61. Loza, J.: 2004, ‘Business-community partnerships: The case for community organization capacity building’, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Madsen, B. T.: 2000, ‘Energy’s wind of change’, UNESCO Courier, 53(3), 9-10.Google Scholar
  63. Mascaenhas, B. and Aaker, D.: 1989, ‘Mobility barriers and strategic groups’, Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 475-585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McGee, J. and Thomas, H.: 1986, ‘Strategic groups: Theory, research and taxonomy’, Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 141-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McPhail, K. and A. Davy: 1998, ‘Integrating Social Concerns into Private Sector Decisionmaking. A Review of Corporate Practices in the Mining, Oil, and Gas Sectors’, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 384.Google Scholar
  66. Meyer, J. and Rowan, B.: 1977, ‘Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Miller, D. and Chen, M.-J.: 1996, ‘The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis’, Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 419-439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. MintGlobal database – MintGlobal Bureau van Dijk: 2008, Retrieved June 4, 2009Google Scholar
  69. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J.: 1998, Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. The Free Press: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  70. Moser, T.: 2001, ‘Mncs and sustainable business practice: The case of the colombian and peruvian petroleum industries’, World Development, 29(2), 291-309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K. and Rangaswami, M. R.: 2009, ‘Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation’, Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56-64.Google Scholar
  72. Offstein, E. and Gnyawali, D.: 2005, ‘Firm competitive behavior as a determinant of CEO pay: Empirical evidence from the us pharmaceutical industry’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(5/6), 335-354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Oliver, C.: 1991, ‘Strategic response to institutional processes’, Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 145-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Osborne, J. D., Charles, I. S. and Arkalgud, R.: 2001, ‘Strategic groups and competitive enactment: A study of dynamic relationships between mental models and performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Payne, D. and Raiborn, C.: 2001, ‘Sustainable development: The ethics support the economics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 157-168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pearce, D.: 2005, ‘Paradoxes in biodiversity conservation’, World Economics, 6(3), 57-69.Google Scholar
  77. Petersen, H. and Vredenburg, H.: 2009, ‘Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pettus, M.: 2001, ‘The resource-based view as a developmental growth process: Evidence from the deregulated trucking industry’, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 878-895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Porter, M. and van der Linde, C.: 1995, ‘Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate’, Harvard Business Review, 73(5): 120-134.Google Scholar
  80. Prahalad, C. and Hamel, G.: 1990, ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68(3):91-97.Google Scholar
  81. Raisch, S. and von Krogh, G.: 2007, ‘Navigating a path to smart growth’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(3), 65-72.Google Scholar
  82. Rajagopalan, N. and Spreitzer, G. M.: 1997, ‘Torward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework’, The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 48-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rajvanshi, A.: 2005, ‘Strengthening biodiversity conservation through community-oriented development projects: Environmental review of the india ecodevelopment project’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 7(2), 299-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Redclift, M.: 1987, Sustainable development. Exploring the contradiction (Methuen: London and New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reinhardt, F.: 1998, ‘Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy’, California Management Review, 40(4), 43-73.Google Scholar
  86. Roberts, D.: 2007, ‘China: Wind Power’s New Force’, Business Week Online, p. 22.Google Scholar
  87. Rugman, A. and Verbeke, A.: 1998a, ‘Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 363-375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rugman, A. and Verbeke, A.: 1998b, ‘Corporate strategy and international environmental policy’, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 819-833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Salancik, G. R. and Meindl, J. R.: 1984, ‘Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(2), 238-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sharma, S. and Henriques, I.: 2005, ‘Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the canadian forest products industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sharma, S. and Vredenburg, H.: 1998, ‘Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(18), 729-753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H. and Westley, F.: 1994, ‘Strategic bridging: A role for the multinational corporation in third world development’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(4), 458-476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shrivastava, P.: 1995b, ‘Environmental technologies and competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Shrivastava, P. and Hart, S.: 1995, ‘Creating sustainable corporations’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 4(3), 154-165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stead, J. and Stead, E.: 2000, ‘Eco-enterprise strategy: Standing for sustainability’, Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4), 313-329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Steurer, R., Langer, M., Konrad, A. and Martinuzzi, A.: 2005, ‘Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development i: A theoretical exploration of business–society relations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sweeney, L. and Coughlan, J.: 2008, ‘Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory’, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. The Economist: 2008, ‘Winds of change’, Economist, 389(8609), 22-25.Google Scholar
  99. The World Bank: 2000, Greening industry: New roles for communities, markets and governments. (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
  100. Ugochukwu, C. N. C. and Ertel, J. r.: 2008, ‘Negative impacts of oil exploration on biodiversity management in the niger delta area of nigeria’, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, 26(2), 139-147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. United Nations: 1992, World investment report (United Nations Publications: New York).Google Scholar
  102. van Marrewijk, M. and Werre, M.: 2003, ‘Multiple levels of corporate sustainability’, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2-3), 107-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vredenburg, H. and F. Westley: 2002, Sustainable Development Leadership in Three Contexts: Managing For Global Competitiveness. In P. N. Nemetz (eds), Bringing Business on Board: Sustainable Development and the B-School Curriculum. JBA Press, Vancouver, pp. 239–259.Google Scholar
  104. Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W.: 1996, Our ecological footprint (New Society Bublishers: Gabriola Island).Google Scholar
  105. Wasserstorm, R. and Reider, S.: 1997a, ‘Lessons from conoco’s experiences in ecuador’s rain forest’, Oil & Gas Journal, 95(33), 24-25.Google Scholar
  106. Wasserstorm, R. and Reider, S.: 1997b, ‘Oil firms in environmentally sensitive areas learing to balance stakholder interests’, Oil & Gas Journal, 95(33), 23-27.Google Scholar
  107. Weber R. (1990) Basic content analysis. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  108. Wernerfelt, B.: 1984, ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Westley, F. and Vredenburg, H.: 1991, ‘Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalist and business in the marketing of green products’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 65-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Westley, F. and Vredenburg, H.: 1996, ‘Sustainability and the corporation. Criteria for aligning economic practice with environmental protection’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2), 104-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Westley, F. and Vredenburg, H.: 1997, ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity’, Organization Science, 8(4), 381-403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Westney, D. E.: (1993). Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. In S. Ghoshal and E. D. Westney (eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. St. Martin’s Press, New York.Google Scholar
  113. World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our common future (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
  114. World Resources Institute: 2002, Emerging Environmental Risks and Shareholder Value in the Oil and Gas Industry Google Scholar
  115. Zucker, L.: 1987, ‘Institutional theories of organizations’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management, University of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada
  2. 2.Haskayne School of Business, University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations