Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Narrow Application of Rawls in Business Ethics: A Political Conception of Both Stakeholder Theory and the Morality of Markets

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that Rawls’ principles of justice provide a normative foundation for stakeholder theory. The principles articulate (at an abstract level) citizens’ rights; these rights create interests across all aspects of society, including in the space of economic activity; and therefore, stakeholders – as citizens – have legitimate interests in the space of economic activity. This approach to stakeholder theory suggests a political interpretation of Boatright’s Moral Market approach, one that emphasizes the rights/place of citizens. And this approach to stakeholder theory – in terms of citizens – raises a further question, what rights and obligations do economic agents have, beyond those attached to their roles as citizens? Rawls would reject additional rights and obligations of this sort for two reasons, one tied to freedom and one tied to pluralism. Rawls’ work therefore presses us to re-conceptualize the place of ethical claims in the economic context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, J. D.: 2008, ‘For-Profit corporations in a Just Society’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18(2), 191-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R. (1999) Does Business Ethics Rest on a Mistake?. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 583-591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. W. and A. M. Marcoux: 1999, ‘Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder Theory in the Original Position’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(2), 207-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A.: 2000, If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich? (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N.: 2003, ‘Democratic Equality: Rawls’s Complex Egalitarianism’, in S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, New York), 241-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, D.: 2005, “The Myth of CSR: The Problem with Assuming that Companies Can Do Well While also Doing Good is that Markets Don’t Really Work that Way’, Stanford Social Innovation Review (Fall issue), 22–29.

  • Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T.W.: 1999, Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreben, B. (2003) On Rawls and Political Liberalism. In: S. Freeman (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 316-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409-421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S.: 2003, ‘Introduction’, in S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, New York), 1-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S.: 2007, Rawls (Routledge, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., J. S. Harrison, and A. C. Wicks: 2007, Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation and Success (Yale University Press, New Haven).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine (September 13).

  • Hartman, E. M.: 2001, ‘Moral Philosophy, Political Philosophy, and Organizational Ethics: A Reply to Phillips and Margolis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11(4), 673-685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, N.: 2005, ‘Rawlsian Justice and Workplace Republicanism’, Social Theory and Practice 31(1), 115-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marens, R.: 2007, ‘Returning to Rawls: Social contracting, social justice, and transcending the limitations of Locke’, The Journal of Business Ethics 75(1), 63-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.: 2003, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. A. and J. D. Margolis: 1999, ‘Toward an Ethics of Organizations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4), 619-638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1999a, A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge) (original edition published in 1971).

  • Rawls, J.: 1999b, The Law of Peoples (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, E. Kelly (ed.) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

  • Reich, R. B.: 2008, Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (Alfred A. Knopf, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D.: 2005, ‘Moral Markets and Moral Managers Revisited’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 129-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollars, G.: 2002, ‘The Corporation as Actual Agreement’, Business Ethics Quarterly 12(3), 351-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank John Dienhart, Maria Derdevandis and Jeff Helmreich for many helpful suggestions and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc A. Cohen.

Additional information

Marc A. Cohen, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Management at Seattle University, where he holds a joint appointment in the Department of Philosophy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, M.A. The Narrow Application of Rawls in Business Ethics: A Political Conception of Both Stakeholder Theory and the Morality of Markets. J Bus Ethics 97, 563–579 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0525-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0525-y

Key words

Navigation