Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transnational Norm-Building Networks and the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the following article, we propose an analytical framework for the analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Standards based on the paradigmatic nexus of voice and entitlement. We follow the theory of decentration and present the concept of Transnational Norm-Building Networks (TNNs), which – as we argue – comprise a new nexus of voice and entitlement beyond the nation–state level. Furthermore, we apply the analytical framework to the ISO 26000 initiative and the Global Compact. We conclude the article with remarks on the legitimacy and the effectiveness of norms generated by TNNs. Through this, we aim to contribute a new theoretical foundation to the analysis of CSR standards, which enables us to undertake a more differentiated description of TNN structures which have hitherto been ignored in academic literature. Secondly, we will contribute to the practical debate on ISO 26000 and the Global Compact by proposing new perspectives on the conditions of their legitimacy and effectiveness based on the voice–entitlement nexus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrne, G. and Brunsson, N.: 2006, ‘Organizing the World’, in M.-L. Djelic and K.Sahlin-Andersson (eds.), Transnational Governance, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 74-94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aviram, A.: 2003, ‘Regulation by Networks’, Brigham Young University Law Review 4, 1179-1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, K. S., and Dilcher, G.: 1999, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte. Stadt und Land – Bürger und Bauer im alten Europa, (Springer, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassen, A., Jastram, S. and Meyer, K.: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. Eine Begriffserläuterung., Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 6 (2), 231-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S.: 1996, Reflexive Modernisierung. Eine Kontroverse, (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. and Lau, Ch. (eds.): 2004, Entgrenzung und Entscheidung, (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B.: 2004, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D. and Husoy, K.: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of The United Nations Global Compact’, Journal of Business Ethics 76 (2), 163-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen S. L.: 1997, ‘The New Federalism: Implications for the Legitimacy of Corporate Political Activity’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7, 81-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, H. A.: 1979, The Changing System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L. and Arato, A.: 1992, Civil Society and Political Theory, (The MIT Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. and Matten, D.: 2004, Business Ethics – A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship And Sustainability In The Age Of Globalization, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A.: 1997, Toward Democracy: A Journey. Reflections: 1940-1997, Vol. 1. Berkeley: (Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É.: 1930, La division du travail social, (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, D. and Rasche, A.: 2006, ‘From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability. Applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research’, Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3), 251-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, C.: 2005, ‘Rebuilding the Law of the Workplace in the Era of Self-Regulation’, Columbia Law Review 105, 319-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K.: 1998, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization 52 (4), 887-917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. U. and Rasche, A.: 2007, ‘Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability – The Ethics of SA 8000’, Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (2), 187-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D.U. and Rasche, A.: 2008, ‘Opportunities and Problems of Standardized Ethics Initiatives - A Stakeholder Theory Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3), 755-773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Compact: 2004, ‘The Global Compact Leaders Summit – Final Report’, Global Compact Office, New York.

  • Global Compact: 2007, ‘The Global Compact Leaders Summit 2007 – Facing Realities: Getting Down to Business’, Global Compact Office, New York.

  • Global Compact: 2008a, ‘Global Compact Governance’, Global Compact Office, New York.

  • Global Compact: 2008b, ‘Global Compact Homepage. Overview of the UN Global Compact’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/aboutthegc/index.html. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • Global Compact: 2008c, ‘Global Compact Homepage. The Ten Principles’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/aboutthegc/TheTenPrinciples/index.html. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • Global Compact: 2008d, ‘Un Global Compact Bulletin, December 2008’, Global Compact Office, New York.

  • Granovetter, M. S.: 1973, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1994, Faktizität und Geltung, (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A.: 1994, The Concept of Law, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F.: 1972, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, (Ullstein, Frankfurt a.M.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, T. A.: 2005, ‘The United Nations Global Compact’, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1, 303-316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilf, M. and Oeter, S.: 2005; ‘Perspektiven der Welthandelsordnung’, in: M. Hilf and S. Oeter (eds.), WTO-Recht (Nomos, Baden-Baden), pp. 701-713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O.: 1970, Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and State, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO: 2004, ‘ISO Advisory Group on Social Responsibility – Working Report on Social Responsibility’, ISO Central Secretariat, Geneva.

  • ISO: 2007, ‘Participating in the Future International Standard ISO 26000 on Social Responsibility’, ISO Central Secretariat, Geneva.

  • ISO: 2008a, ‘International Organisation for Standardization Homepage – About ISO’, http://www.iso.org/iso/about.htm. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • ISO: 2008b, ‘International Organisation for Standardization Homepage. Standards FAQs’, http://www.iso.org/iso/support/faqs/faqs_standards.htm. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • ISO: 2008c, ‘International Organisation for Standardization Homepage. General information on ISO’, http://www.iso.org/iso/support/faqs/faqs_general_information_on_iso.htm. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • ISO: 2008d, ‘International Organisation for Standardization Homepage. ISO Standards’, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • ISO: 2008e, ‘International Organisation for Standardization Homepage. Background’, http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/830949/3934883/3935096/07_gen_info/backg.html. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • ISO: 2008f, ‘ISO and Social Responsibility’, ISO Central Secretariat, Geneva.

  • ISO: 2008g, ‘International Organisation for Standardization Homepage. Time Frame’, http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/830949/3934883/3935096/07_gen_info/timefr.html. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • ISO: 2008h, ‘International Organisation for Standardization Homepage. Participants’, http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/830949/3934883/3935096/04_organization/participants.html. First Accessed Nov 2008.

  • ISO: 2008i, ‘Guidance on Social Responsibility’, Draft ISO 26000 WD4.2. ISO/TMB WG SR N 143. 2008-06-02, ISO Central Secretariat, Geneva.

  • Kant, I.: 1968, ‘Zum Ewigen Frieden. Ein Philosophischer Entwurf’, in W. Weischedel (ed.), Immanuel Kant Werke, (WBG, Darmstadt), pp.191-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein P. J.: 1996, The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K.: 1998, Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics, (Cornell University Press, Ithaca-London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G.: 2003, ‘The Global Compact. Origins, Operations, Progress, Challenges’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 11, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G. and D. Levin: 2003, ‘The Global Compact Network: An Historic Experiment in Learning and Action’, Business and Society Review 108(2), 151–181.

  • Kell, G.: 2005, ‘The Global Compact Selected Experiences and Reflections’, Journal of Business Ethics 59 (2), 69-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G., McIntosh, M. and Waddock, S.: 2004, Learning to Talk: Corporate Citizenship and the Development of the UN Global Compact, (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H.: 1925, Allgemeine Staatslehre, (Springer, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: 1962, ‘An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government’, in J. Locke (ed.), Two Treatises on Civil Government, (Dent, London), pp. 117-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1969, Legitimation durch Verfahren, (Luchterhand, Neuwied).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1972, Rechtsoziologie, (Rowohlt, Reinbek).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P.: 1998, ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’. International Organization 52 (4), 943-969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company: 2004, ‘Assessing the Global Compact’s Impact’, Global Compact Office, New York.

  • Merengo, M.: 1999, L’Europa delle città (Torino).

  • Mitchell, J. C.: 1969, Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analysis of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns, (Manchester University Press, Manchester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. C.: 1973, ‘Networks, Norms and Institutions’, in: J. Boissevain and J.C. Mitchell (eds.): Network Analysis Studies in Human Interaction (Mouton and Company, The Hague) pp. 15-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L.: 1934, Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations, (Nervous & Mental Disease Publishing, Washington, DC).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mückenberger, U.: 2004, Metronome des Alltags (edition Sigma, Berlin).

  • Mückenberger, U.: 2008a, ‘Alternative Mechanisms of Voice Representation’, in: B. Bercusson and C. Estlund (eds.): Regulating Labour in the Wake of Globalisation (Hart Publishing, London), pp. 227-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mückenberger, U.: 2008b, ‘Civilising Globalism: Transnational Norm-Building Networks – A Research Programme’, GIGA Working Papers. N° 90. October 2008, Hamburg.

  • Neumann, F.: 1967, ‘Der Funktionswandel des Gesetzes im Recht der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft’, in F. Neumann (ed.), Demokratischer und Autoritärer Staat (EVA, Frankfurt a. M.), pp. 31–81.

  • Pappi, F. U.: 1987, Methoden der Netzwerkanalyse, (Oldenbourg, München).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D.: 2000, ‘Democracy’, in: R. A. Dahl, I. Shapiro and J.A. Cheibub (eds.), The Democracy Sourcebook, (The MIT Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A.: 2007, ‘A Necessary Supplement – What the United Nations Global Compact Is and Is Not’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/NewsAndEvents/articles_and_papers/GlocalCompact_Supplement.pdf. First Accessed Dec 2008.

  • Richter, J.: 2001, Holding Corporations Accountable: Corporate Conduct, International Codes, and Citizen Action, (Zed Books, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau J. N.: 2003, Distant Proximities. Dynamics Beyond Globalization, (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G.: 2002, ‘The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact’, Journal of Corporate Citizenshi 5, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S.: 2003, ‘Globalization or Denationalisation?’, Review of International Political Economy 10, 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S.: 2006, Territory—Authority—Rights. From Medieval to Global Assemblages, (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G.: 2007, ‘Toward a Political Conception Of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen From a Habermasian Perspective’. Academy of Management Review, 32 (4), 1096-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. and Baumann, D.: 2006, ‘Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance’. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4), 505-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedeknecht, M. and J. Wieland: 2006, ‘ISO 26000 as a Stakeholder Dialogue – An Empirical Study’, KIeM Working Paper Nr. 24/2006, Konstanz.

  • Slaughter, A.-M.: 2004, A New World Order, (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamm Hallström, K.: 2005, ‘International Standardization Backstage – ISO Competing for Standard-Setting Space in the Social Responsibility (SR) Field’, Score, Stockholm, http://www.score.su.se/pdfs/EGOS.pdf. First Accessed Dec 2008.

  • Tamm Hallström, K.: 2006, ‘ISO Enters the Field of Social Responsibility (SR) – Construction and Tension of Global Governance’, in F. Schuppert (ed.), Contributions to Governance – Global Governance and the Role of Non-State Actors (Nomos, Berlin), pp. 117–156.

  • Tamm Hallström K.: 2008, ‘ISO expands its business into Social Responsibility (SR)’, in M. Boström and C. Garsten (eds), Organizing Transnational Accountability. Mobilization, Tools, Challenges, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Telò, M.: 2001, European Union and New Regionalism, (Ashgate, Aldershot).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C.: 2005, Trust and Rule, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C.: 2007, Democrac,. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappman, M., Hummel, H. J. and Sodeur, W.: 2005, Strukturanalyse sozialer Netzwerke, (VS Verlag, Wiesbaden).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1999, ‘Secretary-General Address to the World Economic Forum in Davos’, SG/SM/6881, Press Release, 1 Feb.

  • United Nations: 2008, ‘The Global Compact. A Network of Networks’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/network_paper.pdf. First Accessed Dec 2008.

  • Waddock, S.: 2002, ‘Learning from Experience: The UN Global Compact Learning Forum 2002’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/NewsAndEvents/event_archives/lf_berlin/waddock_rep.pdf. First Accessed Dec 2008.

  • Waddock, S.: 2004, ‘Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real’, Journal of Business Ethics 50, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 2005, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.).

  • Williams, O.F.: 2004, ‘The UN Global Compact: The Challenge and the Promise’, Business Ethics Quartely 14 (4), 755-774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbansen, P.: 2006, ‘Transnational Law’, in: J. Smits (ed.), Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, (Edward Elgar, Brookfield), pp. 738-754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M.: 1998, Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance, (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. and Joerges, Chr.: 2005, Law and Governance in Postnational Europe. Compliance beyond the Nation-State, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge),

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bremen University, 28334, Bremen, Germany

    Ulrich Mueckenberger

  2. Humboldt-University of Berlin, 10099, Berlin, Germany

    Sarah Jastram

Authors
  1. Ulrich Mueckenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Jastram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Jastram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueckenberger, U., Jastram, S. Transnational Norm-Building Networks and the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards. J Bus Ethics 97, 223–239 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0506-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0506-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation