Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite their ethical intentions, ethically minded consumers rarely purchase ethical products (Auger and Devinney: 2007, Journal of Business Ethics 76, 361–383). This intentions–behaviour gap is important to researchers and industry, yet poorly understood (Belk et al.: 2005, Consumption, Markets and Culture 8(3), 275–289). In order to push the understanding of ethical consumption forward, we draw on what is known about the intention–behaviour gap from the social psychology and consumer behaviour literatures and apply these insights to ethical consumerism. We bring together three separate insights – implementation intentions (Gollwitzer: 1999, American Psychologist 54(7), 493–503), actual behavioural control (ABC) (Ajzen and Madden: 1986, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22, 453–474; Sheeran et al.: 2003, Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 393–410) and situational context (SC) (Belk: 1975, Journal of Consumer Research 2, 157–164) – to construct an integrated, holistic conceptual model of the intention–behaviour gap of ethically minded consumers. This holistic conceptual model addresses significant limitations within the ethical consumerism literature, and moves the understanding of ethical consumer behaviour forward. Further, the operationalisation of this model offers insight and strategic direction for marketing managers attempting to bridge the intention–behaviour gap of the ethically minded consumer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behaviour. Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2002a). Percieved Behavioural Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2002b). Residual Effects of Past on Later Behaviour: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 107-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I.: 2006, Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Retrieved September 20, 2009.

  • Ajzen, I., Brown, T. C., & Carvajal, F. (2004). Explaining the Discrepancy Between Intentions and Actions: The case of Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 30(9), 1108-1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and percieved behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areni, C. and I. Black: 2008, Why Consumers Don’t Do as They Say: Hyperbolic Discounting vs. Temporal Construal Theory. Paper Presented at the International Centre For Anti-Consumption Research Symposium, Sydney, Australia

  • Armitage, C. J. and M. Conner: 1999, ‘The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Assessment of Predictive Validity and ‘Percieved Control’’, British Journal of Social Psychology 38, 35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M., Lampila, P., Saba, A., Lahteenmaki, R., et al. (2008). Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite, 50, 443-454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of PReferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. (1993). On the neglect of volition in consumer research: A critique and proposal. Psychology and Marketing, 10, 215-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. (2000). The Poverty of Economic Explanations of Consumption and an Action Theory Alternative. Managerial and decision economics, 21, 95-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R., & Dholakia, U. M. (1999). Goal Setting and Goal Striving in Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Marketing 63, 19-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13, 623-649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. (1975). Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 157-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R., Devinney, T. M., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer Ethics Across Cultures. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8(3), 275-289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 355-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer - do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., Szmigin, I., & Wright, J. (2004). Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(6), 401-417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why People Don’t Take their Concerns about Fair Trade to the Supermarket: The Role of Neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 89-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Shaw, D. (2006). Identifying fair trade in consumption choice. Journal of strategic marketing, 14, 353-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitiative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the Intention-Behaviour Mythology: An Integrated Model of Recycling. Marketing Theory, 2(1), 29-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2007). A Model for Fair Trade Buying Behaviour: The Role of Perceived Quantity and QUality of Information and Product-specific Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 361-380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R., & Gopinath, M. (2007). How Formulating Implementation Plans and Remembering Past Actions Facilitate the Enactment of Effortful Decisions. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 20, 343-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological Fit in Management Field Research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155-1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, R., & Jankel-Elliot, N. (2003). Using Ethnography in Strategic Consumer Research. Qualitative Market Reserach: An International Journal, 6(4), 215-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairtrade, F. L. O. I. (2007). Annual Report 2007: An Inspiration for Change (Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, Bonn, DE).

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison - Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behavior: a test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723-746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (1993). A Behaviourist Perspective on Purchase and Consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 27(8), 7-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, O., & McGoldrick, P. (2008). Motivations of the Ethical Consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 445-467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K. (2003). A Theoretical Review of Business and Consumer Ethics Research: Normative and Descriptive Approaches. The Marketing Review, 3, 381-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futerra, S. C. L. (2005). The Rules of the Game: The Principals of Climate Change Communication. London, UK: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal Achievement: The role of intentions (Vol. 4). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in experiemental social psychology, 38, 69-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, K. (2006). Environmental psychology and the geographies of ethical and sustainable consumption: aligning, triangulating, challenging? Area, 38(3), 292-300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 5-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. (2006). The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Revision and Three Questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T.: 2005, Motivating Sustainable Consump- tion—A Review of Models of Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change. A Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. London: Policy Studies Institute

  • Kidwell, B., & Jewell, R. D. (2003). An Examination of Percieved Behavioral Control: Internal and External Influences on Intention. Psycology & Marketing, 20(7), 625-642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, P., Rise, J., Sutton, S., & Roysamb, E. (2005). Percieved difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: Perceived behavioural control or affective attitude?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 479-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, M. G., M. J. A. Schroder, J. Willock, J. Whitelock and R. Mason: 2007, ‘Exploring Ethical Brand Extensions and Consumer Buying Behaviour: The RSPCA and the “Freedom Food” Brand’, Journal of Product & Brand Management 16(3), 168–177

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1994). Methodology Matters: Doing Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, V. G., Johnson, E., & Schmittlein, D. (1993). Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 46-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz, V. G., Steckel, J. H., & Gupta, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 347-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T. (2005). Case Studying Ethical Consumers’ Projects and Strategies. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm & D. Shaw (Eds.), The Ethical Consumer. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6, 253-270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, W. (2003). ‘After-the-fact causality’: a different direction for cultural geography. Area, 35(4), 418-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notani, A. S. (1998). Moderators of Percieved Behavioural Control’s Predictiveness in the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 247-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcaglar-Toulouse, N., Shui, E., & Shaw, D. (2006). In search of fair trade: ethical consumer decision making in France. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 502-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, M., & Conner, M. (2000). Predicting and understanding behavioral volitions: the interplay between goals and behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 705-731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, H. (1993). How customers actually shop:customer interaction with the point of sale. Journal of the Market Research Society, 35(1), 51-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J. (1995). A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 10(3), 29-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M., & Gross, M. (2004). Ability of Experience Design Elements to Elicit Emotions and Loyalty Behaviours. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 551-578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis)

  • Shaw, D., & Clarke, I. (1999). Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: an exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 17(2), 109-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Connolly, J. (2006). Identifying fair trade in consumption choice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 353-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006). Consumption as voting: an exploration of consumer empowerment. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9), 1049-1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., E. Shiu and I. Clarke: 2000, ‘The Contribution of Ethical Obligation and Self-Identity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour: An Exploration of Ethical Consumers’, Journal of Marketing Management 16, 879–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., Bekin, C., & Hogg, G. (2007). Intending To Be Ethical: An Examination of Consumer Choice in Sweatshop Avoidance. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 31-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Shui, E. (2002). An assessment of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer decision-making: a structural equaiton modelling approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26(4), 286-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, P., Trafimow, D., & Armitage, C. J. (2003). Predicting behaviour from percieved behavioural control: Tests of the accuracy assumption of the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 393-410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherant Theory of Environmentally Significant Behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and Explaining Intentions and Behavior: How Well Are We Doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1317-1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trafimow, D., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Finlay, K. (2002). Evidence that percieved behavioural control is a multidimensional construct: Perceived control and perceived difficulty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 101-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turley, L., & Milliman, R. (2000). Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behaviour: A Review of the Experiemental Evidence. Journal of Business Research, 49, 193-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P., & Sarasin, C. (1995). Facing Public Interest: The Ethical Challenge to Business Policy and Corportate Communications. London: Kluwer Academic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2007). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of Planned Behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64, 542-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. (2003). Consumer Ethics Research: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 33-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T., & Sheeran, P. (2007). How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 295-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. R., DeSarbo, W. S., & Morwitz, V. G. (1998). The Stochastic Modeling of Purchase Intentions and Behaviour. Management Science, 44(2), 188-202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G.: 2003, How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Michal J. Carrington, Benjamin A. Neville & Gregory J. Whitwell

Authors
  1. Michal J. Carrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin A. Neville
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregory J. Whitwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal J. Carrington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A. & Whitwell, G.J. Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers. J Bus Ethics 97, 139–158 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation