Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of the Views of Management Teams in Large Companies

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In light of the many corporate scandals, social and ethical commitment of society has increased considerably, which puts pressure on companies to communicate information related to corporate social responsibility (CSR). The reasons underlying the decision by management teams to engage in ethical communication are scarcely focussed on. Thus, grounded on legitimacy and stakeholder theory, this study analyses the views management teams in large listed companies have on communication of CSR. The focus is on aspects on interest, motives/reasons, users and problems related to corporate communication of CSR information. A questionnaire survey and in-depth interviews confirm that there is a distinct trend shift towards more focus on CSR in corporate communication. Whilst this trend shift started as a reactive approach initiated by the many corporate scandals, the trend shift is now argued to be of a proactive nature focussed at preventing legitimacy concerns to arise. These findings are significant and interesting, implying that we are witnessing a transit period between two legitimacy strategies. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the way respondents argue when it comes to CSR activities coincides with consequentialism or utilitarianism, i.e. companies engage in CSR activities to avoid negative impacts instead of being driven by a will to make a social betterment or acting in accordance with what is fundamentally believed to be right to do. This provides new input to the ongoing debate about business ethics. The findings should alert national and international policy makers to the need both to increase the vigilance and capacity of the regulatory and judicial systems in the CSR context and to increase institutional pressure to enhance CSR adoption and CSR communication. Furthermore, stakeholders need to be careful in assuming that CSR communication is an evidence of a CSR commitment influencing corporate behaviour and increasing business ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAA (The American Accounting Association). 1936, Statement on corporate accounting standards, (Ohio, AAA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, R. W. and R. Bauer (eds.): 1976, Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemma. (Reston, Reston, VA).

  • Adams, C. A., Hill, W-Y. and Roberts, C. B.: 1998, ‘Corporate social reporting practices in western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour?’, British Accounting Review, 30, 1-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artsberg K. (1992) Normbildning och redovisningsförändring: Värderingar vid val av mätprinciper inom svensk redovisning. Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson, S.: 2003, Demand and Supply of Information on Intangibles: The Case of Knowledge-Intense Companies. PhD dissertation, Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Sweden.

  • Arvidsson, S.: 2009, Non-Financial Information and the Annual Report. Working Paper, Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Sweden.

  • Ashforth, B. E. and Gibbs, B. W.: 1989, ‘The double-edge of organizational legitimation’, Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M. E., Kasznik, R. and McNichols, M. F. (2001) ‘Analyst coverage and intangible assets’, Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 1-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birth, G., Illia, L., Lurati, F. and Zamparini, A.: 2008, ‘Communicating CSR: Practices among Switzerland’s top 300 companies’, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 13(2), 182-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borglund, T.: 2009, ‘CSR-kommunikation (CSR communication)’, in: T. Borglund., H. De Geer, H. and M. Hallvarsson (Eds.), Värdeskapande CSR – Hur företag tar socialt ansvar, (Norstedts Akademiska Förlag, Sweden), p. 111-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. and Rodrigues, L. L.: 2006, ‘Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective’,. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brytting, T.: 2005, Företagsetik [Business Ethics]. (Liber, Sweden).

  • Bukh, P. N., Nielsen, C., Mouritsen, J. and Gormsen, P.: 2006, ‘Disclosure of information on intellectual capital in Danish IPO prospectuses’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 713-732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Geer, H.: 2007, Från svenska modellen till svenskt näringsliv [From the Swedish Model to the Swedish business society] (Ratio, Sweden).

  • De Geer, H.: 2009, ‘CSR-begreppet och dess utveckling (The CSR-concept and its development)’, in T. Borglund., H. De Geer, H. and M. Hallvarsson (Eds.), Värdeskapande CSR – Hur företag tar socialt ansvar, (Norstedts Akademiska Förlag, Sweden), p. 13-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C.: 2002, ‘Introduction – The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – A theoretical foundation’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (3), 282-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J.: 1975, ‘Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior’, The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Herz, R. H., Keegan, E. M. and D. M. H. Phillips. (2001) The value reporting revolution: Moving beyond the earnings game, (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerup Nielsen A., Thomsen C. (2007) ‘Reporting CSR What and how to say it?’. Corporate Communication: An International Journal 12(1):25-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: 2001, Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (European Commission, Luxembourg).

  • Fan, Y.: 2005, ‘Ethical branding and corporate reputation’, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 10(4), 341-350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board): 2001, Business and Financial Reporting, Challenges from the New Economy (special report). (FASB, New York).

  • Frankental, P. (2001) ‘Corporate social responsibility – A pr invention?’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 18-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1994, ‘From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society though’, Business & Society, 33(2), 150-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic management – A stakeholder approach, (Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 33, 122-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. L. and S. Miles: 2001, ‘Socially Responsible Investment and Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting in the U.K.: An Exploratory Study’, British Accounting Review 33, 523-548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S.: 2005, ‘Bad management theories are destroying good management practices’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. B.: 2009, ‘Introduction: Corporate communication and strategic adaptation’, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 14(3), 225-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, K. R., Frieder, L. A. and Clark, G. W.: 2005, Corporate scandals – The many faces of greed, (St. Paul, MN: Paragon House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallvarsson, M.: 2009, Rimliga Ambitioner med CSR? (Reasonable ambitions with CSR?), in T. Borglund., H. De Geer. H. and M. Hallvarsson (Eds.), Värdeskapande CSR – Hur företag tar socialt ansvar, (Norstedts Akademiska Förlag, Sweden), p. 145-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R.: 2005, ‘Debunking the Social Myth’, Business Strategy Review: Special Report: Corporate Social Responsibility, 16(2), 71-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M. and Palepu, K. G. (2001) ‘Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 405-440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H&H Webranking: 2008, CSR Spotlight Report (Hallvarsson & Hallvarsson, Stockholm).

  • Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J., Nath, L. and Wood, D.: 2008, ‘A survey of governance disclosures among U.S. firms’, Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 543-563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihlen, Ø.: 2008, ‘Mapping the environment for corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, publics and the public sphere’, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 13(2), 135-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2001) ‘Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function’, European Financial Management, 7(3), 297-317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. A.: 2000, The end of shareholder value – Corporations at the crossroad,. Cambridge, (MA: Perseus Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG: 2005, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005 (KPMG Global Sustainability Services, Amsterdam).

  • Lantos, G. P. (2001) ‘The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Consumer Market, 18(7), 595-630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., McDonald, B. and Yun, H.: 2009, ‘A wolf in sheep’s clothing: The use of ethics-related terms in 10-K reports’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 39-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., and Ferrell, L:. 2005, ‘A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility in marketing’, European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 956-977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C. and Hult, G. T. M.: 1999, ‘Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D. and Walsh J. P.: 2003, ‘Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A. and Schneeweis, T.: 1988, Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance, Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle. B. R. and Wood, D. J.: 1997, ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. and Schultz, M.: 2006, ‘Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu, D., Warsame, D. and Pedwell, K.: 1998, ‘Managing public impression: Environmental disclosures in annual reports’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, G.: 2002, ‘Environmental disclosures in the annual report – Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, D., Surroca, J. and Tribó, J. A.: 2008, ‘Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationships between earnings management and corporate social responsbility’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 160-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework’, California Management Review, 17(1), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Investment Forum.: 2006, 2006 report in socially responsible investing trends in the United States, (SIF, Washington, D.C).

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU (2004:46): 2004a, The Swedish Code of Corporate Governance (SOU, Stockholm).

  • SOU (2004:47): 2004b, Näringslivet och Förtroendet [Business Society and Trust] (SOU, Stockholm).

  • Sutantoputra, A. W.: 2009, ‘Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms’ CSR reports’, Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 14(1), 34-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Beurden, P. and Gössling, T.: 2008, ‘The worth of values – A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance’, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407-427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Staden, C. J. and Hooks, J.: 2007, ‘A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness’, The British Accounting Review, 39, 197-210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B.: 1997, ‘The corporate social performance – Financial performance link’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, P. and Edwards, T.: 2008, ‘Socially responsible investment: Explaining its uneven development and human resource management consequences’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 135-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windell, K.: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility Under Construction: Ideas, Translations, and Institutional Change. Doctoral Thesis No. 123, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Uppsala.

  • Woodward, D. Edwards, P., and Birkin, F. (2001) ‘Some evidence on executives’ views of corporate social responsibility’, British Accounting Review, 33, 357-397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, Lund School of Economics and Management, Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, Lund, 220 07, Sweden

    Susanne Arvidsson

Authors
  1. Susanne Arvidsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Arvidsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arvidsson, S. Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of the Views of Management Teams in Large Companies. J Bus Ethics 96, 339–354 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0469-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0469-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation