Skip to main content
Log in

Moralising the Market by Moralising the Firm

Towards a Firm-Oriented Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lack of consensus in stating what Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) exactly means has led some people to argue that the concept is too vague to offer guidance, while others suggest forgetting about theorising and instead focusing entirely on the development of practical applications such as codes of conduct, standards and reporting initiatives. This article argues that the discussion on CSR as a whole has reached this impasse because it ignores two major underlying problems. First, the fact that CSR is an ideological notion: the definition and use of ‘CSR’ depends on the moral and practical views of the people and organisations involved. Secondly, the debate on CSR lacks a thorough discussion about the nature and role of the firm, the main actor when it comes to accepting and implementing CSR. After explaining our standpoint, this article winds up with the implications of this reframing for the CSR debate, for the efforts to define it and for the efforts to apply it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., J.A Robinson, S. Johnson. (2000). The colonial origins of comparative development: an emprical investigation. Cambridge, USA/MA: MIT, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi, K.M. and B. Adi (2007). Reconstructing the corporate social responsibility construct in Utlish, Business Ethics: a European Review, 16 (1), 3-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1950). A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B., William Hesterly. (1999). Organizational Economics: understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In S. R. C. a. C. Hardy (Ed.), Studying Organisation: theory & method (pp. 109-141). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, E.D. (2006). The Origin of Wealth: evolution, complexity and the radical remaking of economics. Harvard: Harvard Business school Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1998a). The law of the Markets. Oxford Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1998b). The Embeddedness of economic markets in economics In M. Callon (Ed.), The Law of the Markets (pp. 1-57). Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., A.W. Lo, A.C. MacKinlay. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, The Academy of Management Review, 4 (4.), 497-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1937). The nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. The academy of Management Journal, 16 (2): 312-322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1979). Dependent Development: the alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: states & industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (2004). Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID), 38(4), 3-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, M., Kieran Healy. (2007). Moral Views of Market Society. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 285-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 2005, Rethinking the Social Responsibility of Business. A Reason Debate, Featuring Milton Friedman, Whole Foods’ John Mackey, and Cypress Semiconductor’s T.J. Rodgers, October, 1–10.

  • Garriga, E. and D. Melé (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology. In: N. Nohria and R. C. Eccles (eds), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (pp. 25-49). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S., Hart, O. (1986). The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: a theory of vertical integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691-719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse : ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, S. (2005). Toward a vocabulary for speaking of the engagement of things into discourse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 239-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The Passions and the Interests. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. (1993). Economics and Evolution: bringing life back Into economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., W Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketola, T. (2008). A Holistic Corporate Responsibility Model: Integrating Values, Discourses and Actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 419-435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. (1999). The Future of Economic Theory. In A. Kirman, Louis-André Gérard-Varet (Ed.), Economics beyond the Millennium (pp. 8-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koza, M.P., Jean-Claude Thoenig. (2003). Rethinking the Firm: organizational approaches. Organization Studies, 24(8), 1219-1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of the Nations. Brettenham: Little, Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R.E. (1991). The Market Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., Fabian Muniesa,Lucia Siu. (2007). Do Economists Make Markets?: On the performativity of economics: : Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. (2008). De eeuw van Azië: een onafwendbare mondiale machstverschuiving. Amsterdam: Nieuw Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K.: 1872, Het Kapitaal: een kritische beschouwing over de economie (I. Lipschits, Trans. 5e ed.) (De Haan, Bussum).

  • McCloskey, D. (2006). The Bourgeois Virtues: ethics in an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around Organisations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). Strategievorming. Tien scholen. Schiedam: Scriptum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R.: 2008, ‘The Economist Has No Clothes’, Scientific American, April 2008

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1994). Economic Performance Through Time. The American Economic Review, 84, 359-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (2000). Big Bills Left on the Sideway: Why Some Nations are Rich and Others Poor. In: M. Olson and S. Kähkönen (eds.), A Not So-Dismal Science: A Broader View of Economies and Societies (pp. 37-60). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. and C. van der Linde (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 97-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Haper & Brothers Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development. New York: Oxfrod University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2005). The Paradox of Choice. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (2004). The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1757). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In: E. Cannan (ed.). Compilation of An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sornette, D. (2003). Why Stockmarkets Crash: critical events in financial markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. and G.S. Becker (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. The American Economic Review, 67 (2), 76-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N.N. (2007). The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing Capitalism. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44 (2):95-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tulder, R. and A. van der Zwart: 2003, Reputaties op het spel. Maatschappelijk verantwoord ondernemen in een onderhandelingssamenleving (Uitgeverij Het Spectrum B.V., Utrecht), pp. 18–138.

  • Veblen, T. (1974). De theorie vande nietsdoende klasse. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Votaw, D.: 1972, `Genius Becomes Rare: A comment on the Doctrine of Social responsibility', California Management Review (pre-1986), 15(winter 1973), 25–31.

  • Wiggins, R.R., TW Ruefli. (2002). Sustained Competitive Advantage. Organization Science, 13(1), 81-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, R.R., TW Ruefli. (2005). Schumpeter’s Ghost: Is Hypercompetition Making the Best of Times Shorter? Strategic Management Journal, 26, 887-911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (2007). Pasts and Futures of Economic Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(8), 1056-1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin B. P. de Jong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knippenberg, L., de Jong, E.B.P. Moralising the Market by Moralising the Firm. J Bus Ethics 96, 17–31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0446-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0446-9

Key words

Navigation