Fair Trade Consumption: In Support of the Out-Group
Two sets of self-transcendence values – universalism and benevolence – act as a source of motivation for the promotion of the welfare of the other rather than the self. This article sought to determine the exact nature of the interaction between these sets of values and the consumption of fair trade products. In an earlier study, universalism values were found to have a significant influence on fair trade consumption whereas benevolence values did not, despite their shared goal and values theory. Additionally, there was supporting evidence in the extant literature that benevolence values should influence fair trade consumption behavior. This study took a closer look at the individual values that make up the value categories universalism and benevolence to better understand and describe this universalism–benevolence distinction in fair trade consumption. It was established that perhaps group membership has an influence on the decision to buy fair trade products. Specifically, it seems that an overriding sense of responsibility to one’s own group – the in-group – prevents some consumers from identifying with, empathizing with, and subsequently sharing resources with fair trade producers; members of out-groups in far-flung corners of the globe. It appears that the universalism–benevolence distinction in fair trade consumption might also be described as an in-group–out-group distinction.
Keywordsfair trade ethical consumption SVS values Schwartz values theory out-group activism benevolence universalism
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bond, M. H. and V. M.-Y. Chi: 1997, ‘Values and moral behavior’, Psychologia, 40, 251–264.Google Scholar
- Boote, A. S. (1981) ‘Market segmentation by personal values and salient product attributes: demographics only tell part of the story’. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(1): 29–35. Retrieved May 22, 2006, from Business Source Premier Database.Google Scholar
- Borshuk, C.: 2004, ‘An interpretive investigation into motivations for out-group activism’, The Qualitative Report, 9(2), 300-319.Google Scholar
- FLO: n.d., ‘FAQ’. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from http://www.fairtrade.net/figures.html?and2000=.
- Hudson, I. and Hudson, M.: 2003, How Alternative is Alternative Trade?: Alternative Trade Coffee in the Chiapas Region of Mexico. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://fairtraderesource.org/-HowAlternIsAlternTrade.pdf#search=%22%22.
- Kahle, L. R. (Ed.). :1983, Social Values and Social Change: Adaptation to Life in America, (Praeger, New York).Google Scholar
- Littrell, M. A. and M. A. Dickson: 1997, ‘Alternative trading organizations: Shifting paradigm in a culture of social responsibility’, Human Organization, 56(3), 344–351. Retrieved October 6, 2002, from ABI/INFORM Global database.Google Scholar
- Madrigal, R. (1995) ‘Personal values, traveler personality type, and leisure travel style’. Journal of Leisure Research 27(2):125. Retrieved May 26, 2006, from ABI/INFORM Global database.Google Scholar
- Maietta, O. W.: 2003, The Hedonic Price of Fair-Trade Coffee for the Italian Consumer. Paper Presented at the Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO, Capri, Italy. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from http://www.ecostat.unical.it/2003agtradeconf/Contributed%20papers/Maietta.pdf.
- McCarty, J. A. and L. J. Shrum: 1993, ‘The role of personal values and demographics in predicting television viewing behavior: Implications for theory and application’, Journal of Advertising, 22(4), 77–101. Retrieved April 14, 2006, from Business Source Premier database.Google Scholar
- Mitias, M. H.: 2003, ‘Universalism as a path the dialogue between civilizations’, Dialogue and Universalism, 13(5), 47–60. Retrieved September 9, 2007 from Academic Search Premier database.Google Scholar
- Renard, M.-C.: 2001, “Alternativeness” of Fair Trade: Risks and Challenges. Paper Presented at International Perspectives on Alternative Agro-Food Networks: Quality, Embededness, Bio-Politics, Santa Cruz, CA. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www2.ucsc.edu/globalinterns/cpapers/Renard_paper.pdf#search = %22%22Renard%22%20%22Alternativeness%20*%20Fair%20Trade%22%22
- Rokeach, M.: 1973, The Nature of Human Values, (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992) Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Content of Human Values?. in: M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, Academic, Orlando, FL, pp. 1-65.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S.H., M. Verkasalo, A. Antonovsky, and L. Sagiv : 1997, ‘Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style”. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 3–18.Google Scholar
- Shean, G. D. and T. Shei: 1995, ‘The values of student environmentalists’, Journal of Psychology, 129(5), 559–564. Retrieved October 16, 2006, from Academic Search Premier Database.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H: 1981, Human Groups and Social Categories, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
- TransFair: 2006, Fair Trade Almanac: Transfair USA. Retrieved September 2006, from http://www.transfairusa.org/pdfs/2005FTAlmanac3.17.06.pdf.