Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 88, Supplement 4, pp 595–603 | Cite as

Corporate Social Responsibility and the “Divided Corporate Self”: The case of Chiquita in Colombia

Article

Abstract

This article employs Maak’s framework of the seven “Cs” of Corporate Integrity to assess the problems faced by Chiquita Brands in dealing with extortion by left-wing guerilla and right wing paramilitary groups in Colombia from 1989 to 2004. Both types of organizations used Chiquita payments to engage in terrorist activity in Colombia. The extended and systematic dealings with these groups were antithetical to the process of corporate responsibility to which the firm was committed during the timeframe of 1998–2004, revealing a “divided self” in which major corporate activities diverged dramatically from the core values of the firm. Maak’s framework provides a useful tool in analyzing the division and the potential for applying lessons from the case to our understanding of corporate social responsibility.

Keywords

corporate integrity corporate social responsibility corporate responsibility Chiquita Colombia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altschuller, S., D. Feldman, and L. Blecher: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, The International Lawyer 42(2), 489-500.Google Scholar
  2. Audi, R. and P.E. Murphy: 2006, ‘The Many Faces of Integrity’, Business Ethics Quarterly 16(1), 3-21.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, H., W. H. Camp and C. Hasler: February 2009, ‘Report of the Special Litigation Committee of Chiquita Brands International, Inc., In Re: Chiquita Brands International Inc. Alien Tort Statute and Shareholder Derivative Action, Doc 202 Case No.: 08-01916-MD, United States District Court for the Southern District of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, T.E.; 1998, ‘Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness’, Academy of Management Review 23(1), 154-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, M.T.: 2005, Corporate Integrity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, NY).Google Scholar
  6. Cahn, N. and A. Gambino.: 2008, ‘Towards of Typology of Corporate Responsibility in Different Governance Contexts: What to Do in the Absence of Responsible Country Governance?’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 39(4), 655-78.Google Scholar
  7. Calhoun, C.: 1995, ‘Standing for Something’, Journal of Philosophy 92(5), 235-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diperna, T.A..: 2008, ‘Small Arms and Light Weapons: Complicity “With a View” Toward Extended State Responsibility’, Florida Journal of International Law, 20(1), 25-77.Google Scholar
  9. Dunfee, T.W.: 1999, ‘Corporate Governance in a Market with Morality’, Law and Contemporary Problems 62: 129-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunfee, T.W.: 2000, ‘Tightening the Ties that Bind – Defending a Contractarian Approach to Business Ethics’, American Business Law Journal 37(3), 579-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunfee, T.W.: 2006, ‘A Critical Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Recurring Criticisms and the Next Generation Research Topics’, Journal of Business Ethics 68: 303-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garriga, E. and D. Mele 2004 ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory’. Journal of Business Ethics 53: 51-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez E 2002 ‘Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics 39:101-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe 2002 The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.Google Scholar
  15. Koehn, D.: 2005, ‘Integrity as a Business Asset’, Journal of Business Ethics 58, 125-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maak, Thomas.: 2008, ‘Undivided Corporate Responsibility: Towards a Theory of Corporate Integrity’, Journal of Business Ethics 82: 353-368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mayer, D.: 2001, ‘Community, Business Ethics, and Global Capitalism’, American Business Law Journal 38(2), 215-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayer, D.: 2007, ‘Corporate Citizenship and Trustworthy Capitalism: Cocreating a More Peaceful Planet’, American Business Law Journal 44(2), 237-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McFall, L.: 1987, ‘Integrity’, Ethics 98, 5-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paine, L. S.: 1994, ‘Managing for Organizational Integrity’, Harvard Business Review March–April, pp. 106–117Google Scholar
  21. Petrick, J. A. and J. F. Quinn: 2001, ‘The Challenge of Leadership Accountability for Integrity Capacity as a Strategic Asset’, Journal of Business Ethics 34, 331-343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shaw, B.: 2000, ‘Book Review: Ties That Bind (Donaldson, T. and T. W. Dunfee)’, American Business Law Journal 37(3), 563–578.Google Scholar
  23. Solomon, R.C.: 1993, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
  24. Solomon, R. C.: 1999, A Better Way to Think About Business: How Personal Integrity Leads to Corporate Success (Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
  25. Srivastva, S. and Associates (eds): 1988, Executive Integrity: The Search for High Human Values in Organizational Life (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA/London)Google Scholar
  26. Wempe, B.: 2008, ‗Four Design Criteria for any Future Contractarian Theory of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, 697-714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Werre, M.: 2003, ‗Implementing Corporate Responsibility – The Chiquita Case’, Journal of Business Ethics 44, 247-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Warrington College of Business AdministrationThe University of FloridaGainesvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations