Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Human Rights and the New Corporate Accountability: Learning from Recent Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 3rd Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations appears to have generated significant consensus around its approach to business and human rights. This state of harmony relies mainly upon a narrow mandate limiting the endeavour largely to a mapping exercise. It also relies upon a process of ‘operationalisation’ that is yet to be undertaken despite the recent release of a 4th Report. After a brief presentation of the main parameters of the framework proposed by the 3rd Report and of its precarious advantage over other similar initiatives, this article takes a close look at the main link that needs to be operationalised: i.e. the link between corporate responsibility for human rights and the concept of legal and criminal responsibility. The article then addresses the constitutive elements of the concept of responsibility to shed light upon the responsibility of business organisations in a human rights law context. It looks at the innovative ways in which the concept of corporate criminal responsibility has been dealt with in various domestic jurisdictions and at the new paradigms of corporate agency resulting in the process. Building on this inquiry, the analysis focusses on the way in which the legal discourse acquires new dimensions of corporate responsibility by moving away from an individualistic perspective. On the basis of this, the article suggests conceptual tools that can become instrumental in the process of the operationalisation of the 3rd Report, albeit at the likely cost of rendering the consensus around it more fragile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backer, L. C.,: 2006, ‘Multinational Corporations, Transnational Law: The United Nations’ Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations as a Harbinger of Corporate Social Responsibility in International Law’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 37, 287-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, A.: 2002, ‘Corporate Killing as a Corporate Governance Issue’, Corporate Governance 10(1), 47-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T.: 2007, ‘The Normative Grounding of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Human Rights Approach’, in D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu and T. Campbell (eds), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 529-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernic, L. C.: 2008, ‘Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights’, Libertas Working Paper, No. 1/2008 (June 27, 2008). Available at http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1152354.

  • Commonwealth Criminal Law Act (1995), Available at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/cca1995115/sch1.html.

  • Decreto Legislativo 231: 2001, ‘Disciplina della responsabilita amministrativa delle persone giuridiche, delle societa e delle associazioni anche prive di personalita giuridica’, published in Gazzetta Ufficiale No. 140 (19 June 2001).

  • Economic Offences Act, s.15, Staatsblad K. 258 (22 June 1950).

  • Ferguson, G.: 1999, ‘The Basis for Criminal Responsibility of Collective Entities in Canada’ in A. Eser, G. Heine and B. Huber (eds.), Criminal Responsibility of Legal and Collective Entities (Ed. Iuscrim, Freiburg im Breisgau), pp. 165-173.

  • Field, S. and Jorg, N.: 1991, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability and Manslaughter: Should We Be Going Dutch?’, Criminal Law Review, (March) 156–171.

  • Fisse, B. and Braithwaite, J.: 1991, Corporations, Crime and Accountability, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. P.: 1978, Rethinking Criminal Law (Little, Brown: Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, N. H. D.: 2005, ‘The Theoretical Background: The Nature of the Actors in Corporate Social Responsibility’, in S. Tully (ed), A Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility, (Edward Elgar Publishing, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P.: 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility, (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glinski, C.: 2007, ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct: Moral or Legal Obligations?’ in D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu and T. Campbell (eds), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, F.: 2002, ‘Towards Understanding Globalisation and Control of Corporate Harm: A Preliminary Criminological Analysis’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 12(2), 166-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine G. H.: 2000, ‘Criminal Responsibility of Legal Persons in Civil Law Jurisdictions’ (paper prepared for OECD Anti-Corruption Unit, Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (DAFFE/IME/BR(2000)23).

  • Hill, J.: 2003, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in Australia: An Evolving Corporate Governance Technique?’, Vanderbilt University Law School, Law & Economics Working Paper No. 03–10.

  • ICJ (International Commission of Jurists): 2008a, Report of the International Commission of Jurists Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability, Volume 1, ‘Facing the Facts and Charting a Legal Path’, Geneva. Available at http://www.icj.org/news.php3?id_article=4405.

  • ICJ (International Commission of Jurists): 2008b, Report of the International Commission of Jurists Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability, Volume 2, ‘Criminal Law and International Crimes’, Geneva. Available at http://www.icj.org/news.php3?id_article=4405.

  • Kinley, D. and Chambers, R.: 2007, ‘The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of Public International Law’. Human Rights Law Review 6(3), 447-497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, L.: 2007, ‘Nuova disciplina sulla responsabilità amministrativa delle società ed enti’, Diritto & Diritti – Electronic Law Review. Available at http://www.diritto.it/materiali/civile/lombardo.html.

  • May, L.: 1992, Sharing Responsibility, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcbarnet, D. and Schmidt, P.: 2007, ‘Corporate Accountability through Creative Enforcement: Human Rights, the Alien Tort Claims Act and the Limits of Legal Impunity’, in D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu and T. Campbell (eds), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale, R. and Simons, P.: 2007, ‘Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law’, Modern Law Review 70(4), 598-625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. S.: 1997, Placing Blame: A Theory of Criminal Law. (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrie, A.: 2000, Punishment, Responsibility and Justice, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrie, A.: 2001, Crime, Reason and History, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C.: 2007, ‘Meta-regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu and T. Campbell (eds), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 207–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D.: 2006, ‘Dworkin on the Semantics of Legal and Political Concepts’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26(3), 545–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R.: 2003, ‘Une responsabilité sans culpabilité: L’entreprise, la “faute d’organisation” et le droit pénal’, L’Expert-comptable Suisse spéciale: La punissabilité de l’entreprise (June–July03) 18–19.

  • Ruggie, J.: 2006, Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Business and Human Rights, Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. UN Doc E/CN.4/2006/97 (22 February 2006).

  • Ruggie, J.: 2007, Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Business and Human Rights, Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts, UN Doc A/HRC/4/35 (9 February 2007).

  • Ruggie, J.: 2008a, ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General On the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc A/HRC/8/5 (7 April 2008).

  • Ruggie, J.: 2008b, ‘Statement to United Nations Human Rights Council: Mandate Review’, Geneva (5 June 2008). Available at: http://www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-statement-mandate-review-5-Jun-2008.doc.

  • Ruggie, J.: 2009, ‘Business and human rights: Towards Operationalising the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General On the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, UN Doc A/HRC/11/13 (22 April 2009).

  • Schrage, E.: 2003, ‘Emerging Threat: Human Rights Claims’, Harvard Business Review 81(8), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P.: 1994, ‘Self-Regulation and the Theory of Institutions’, in G. Teubner, L. Farmer and D. Murphy, (eds.), Environmental Law and Ecological Responsibility: The Concept and Practice of Self-Organization, (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester), pp.396-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, D.: 2006, ‘Collective Responsibility, Corporate Responsibility and Moral Taint’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30(1), 269-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, C.: 2003, ‘Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(2) 143-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, B.: 2002, ‘The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights’, Berkeley Journal International Law 20(1), 45-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, L. A.: 2004, ‘On the Nature of Corporations’, Deakin Law Review 9(2), 775-789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stressens, G.: 1994, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Perspective’, International and Corporative Law Quarterly 43, 493-520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. I.: 2004, ‘Nationalizing International Criminal Law: The International Criminal Court as a Roving Mixed Court’, Stanford Journal of International Law 41(3), 1-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): 2003, Sub-Commission on Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2 (Aug 26, 2003). Available at: http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/E.CN.4.Sub.2.2003.12.Rev.2.En.

  • Unated Nations Commission on Human Rights: 2004, Report to the Economic and Social Council on the Sixtieth Session of the Commission, Resolution UN Doc E/CN.4/2004/L.11/Add.7. Available at http:// www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/e06a5300f90fa0238025668700518ca4/169143c3c1009015c1256e 830058c441/$FILE/G0413976.pdf.

  • Velasquez, M.: 1991, Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do?’ in L. May and S. Hoffmann (eds.). Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Savage, Md.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervaele, J. A. E.: 1998, ‘La responsabilidad penal de y en el seno de la persona jurídica en Holanda: Matrimonio entre pragmatismo y dogmática jurídica’, Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminologia 2(1), 153-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. and Elias, J.: 2003, ‘Catching the Conscience of the King: Corporate Players on the International Stage’, in P. Alston (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights: Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbrodt, D. and Kruger, M.: 2003, ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’, American Journal of International Law 97, 901-922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S.: 1991, ‘The Legal and Moral Responsibility of Organizations,’ in J. J. Brummer (ed.), Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis, (Greenwood Press, New York), pp. 165-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Development Movement: 1999, Making Investment Work for People: An International Framework for Regulating Corporations. (World Development Movement: London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Law, Westminster University, Little Titchfield Street, London, W1W 7UW, U.K.

    Aurora Voiculescu

Authors
  1. Aurora Voiculescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurora Voiculescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voiculescu, A. Human Rights and the New Corporate Accountability: Learning from Recent Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 2), 419–432 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0294-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0294-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation