Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diffusion of Corporate Responsibility Practices to Companies: The Experience of the Forest Sector

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This qualitative study indentifies how corporate responsibility (CR) practices are diffused to companies, as well as the factors that influence this diffusion process. Forest companies, industry associations, non-governmental organizations, and academics in Brazil, Canada, and the United States participated in this interview-based study. Data emerging from a grounded theory approach revealed three factors influencing the diffusion of CR practices to companies: (1) external contextual characteristics, (2) connectors, and (3) experts and expert organizations. These three factors influence each other, meaning that the diffusion process of CR practices is somewhat cyclic. These interactions are usually manifested by companies and expert organizations influencing each other’s actions, being influenced by the external environment, and contributing to the CR trends that are observed in the external environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adizes, I. and Weston, J. F. (1973). Comparative models of social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 112-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. H. (1970). Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 267-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, L. R. and Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C. J. and Kirsch, D. A. (2001). International diffusion of ISO 14000 certification. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2007). Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R. and Daily, C. M. (1991). The constituents of corporate responsibility: Separate, but not separable, interests? Business Horizons, 34(4), 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore corporate social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1967). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle. Business Horizons, 10(4), 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal (pre-1986), 16(2), 312–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1982) Corporations and morality. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliff, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W. (2000). Précis for ties that bind. Business and Society, 105(Winter), 436–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilbirt, H. and Parket, I. R. (1973). The current status of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 16(4), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. M. (1987). The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review, 29(3), 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (1995). Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 444-473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. and Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations. New York, NY: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1977). Population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A.J. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses - the diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization Environment, 14(2), 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, H. (2004). A collective lack of memory. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO: 2007, The ISO Survey of Certifications 2007. http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1178. Retrieved 2 June 2009.

  • Johnson, H. (1971). Business in contemporary society: Framework and issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1983). An integrating framework for research in business and society: A step toward the elusive paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juslin, H. and Hansen, E. 2002. Strategic marketing in the global forest industries. 1st Edition, Corvallis, OR: Authors Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loew, T., Ankele, K., Braun, S., and Clausen, J. 2004. Significance of CSR debate for sustainability and the requirements for companies: summary. Munster, Berlin: Future e.V. and Institute for Ecological Economy Research GmbH (IÖW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilakanta, S. and Scamell, R. W. (1990). The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment. Management Science, 36(1), 24-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (Fifth Edition). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (1982). Organizational structure and the institutional environment: The case of public schools. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(2), 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAAS: 2008, Certified Facilities List. http://www.saasaccreditation.org/certfacilitieslist.htm. Retrieved 2 June 2009.

  • Scott, W. R. (1990). Innovation in medical care organizations: A synthetic review. Medical Care Research and Review, 47(2), 165-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. and Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (1983). A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, D. and Meyer, J.W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487-551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, D. and Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact. (2009). United Nations global compact annual review 2008. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, N.G. and Kozak, R.A. (2008). The recent evolution of corporate responsibility practices in the forestry sector. International Forestry Review, 10(1), 1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potentials and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297-326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2005). Fade, integrate or transform? The future of CSR. San Francisco, CA: Business for Social Responsibility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Toward improving corporate social performance. Business Horizons, 34(4), 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Natalia G. Vidal, Gary Q. Bull & Robert A. Kozak

Authors
  1. Natalia G. Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gary Q. Bull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert A. Kozak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia G. Vidal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vidal, N.G., Bull, G.Q. & Kozak, R.A. Diffusion of Corporate Responsibility Practices to Companies: The Experience of the Forest Sector. J Bus Ethics 94, 553–567 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0281-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0281-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation