Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of Internal and External Codes on CSR Practice: The Case of Companies Operating in Serbia

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, our aim is to examine the difference between the corporate social responsibility (CSR) practice of the multinational companies (MNCs) and of the domestic companies operating in Serbia, as well as the influence of internal self-regulations such as statements of corporate values and codes of conduct, and external self-regulations such as the implementation of the ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards on CSR practice. The CSR practice is observed in five CSR areas: employee relations, customer relations, environmental practice, community and social involvement, and transparency in business activity. The findings indicate that the CSR practice of the MNCs is significantly different in comparison to domestic companies only in the area of employee relations. Furthermore, the overall results suggest that internal self-regulations have more influence on CSR practice than the implementation of generic management system standards. However, the existence of transparent corporate values, codes of conduct and implemented management systems according to ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards does not prove to be strong predictors of CSR performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

CSR:

corporate social responsibility

MNCs:

multinational companies

QMSs:

Quality Management System standards

EMSs:

Environmental Management System standard

References

  • Adamovich, Lj. S.: 1997, ‘Trends in the Global Economy and Their Implications for Yugoslavia’, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society II(2), 283-299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agatiello, O.: 2008, ‘Ethical governance: beyond good practices and standards’, Management Decision 46(8), 1132-1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, M., Casadesus, M., Karapetrovic, S. and Heras, I. 2009, ‘How integrated are environmental, quality and other standardized management systems? - An empirical study’, Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 742–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castka P. and Balzarova M. A.: 2008, ‘The impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on standardisation of social responsibility—an inside perspective’, International Journal of Production Economics 113, 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W. and Moon, J.: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting’, Business & Society 44 (4), 415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleek M. A. and Leonard S. L.: 1998, ‘Can Corporate Codes of Ethics Influence Behaviour?’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewson, P.: 2008, ‘Applied Statistic Handbook: Coefficient for Measuring Association’, www.acastat.com/statbook/contents.htm.

  • Edwards, T., P. Marginson, P. Edwards, A. Ferner and O. Tregaskis: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Multinational Companies: Management Initiatives or Negotiated Agreements? (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, Switzerland), pp. 1-27. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/inst/publications/discussion/dp18507.pdf.

  • Egyedi, T. M. and S. Toffaletti: 2008, ‘Standardising Social Responsibility: Analysing ISO Representation Issues from SME Perspectives’, Proceedings of the 13th EURAS Workshop on Standardisation, Sweden (European Academy for Standardisation), pp. 121–135

  • Elms, H.: 2006, ‘Corporate (and stakeholder) responsibility in Central and Eastern Europe’, International Journal of Emerging Markets 1(3), 203-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Round Table of Industrialists (ERT): 2001, ERT Position on Corporate Social Responsibility and Response to Commission Green Paper ‘Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, http://www.ert.be/doc/0050.pdf.

  • Evan, W.M.: 1998, ‘International codes of conduct for multinational corporations’, in Duska R. E (eds.), Education, Leadership and Business Ethics (Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp 249-272.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Final Background Paper Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship in the Arab World (FBP CSR Cairo 2007): 2007, ‘Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship in the Arab World, Cairo, Egypt, 2007’, http://www.csr-weltweit.de/uploads/tx_jpdownloads/FinalBackgroundPaper_CSRConference_Cairo.pdf.

  • Gotzamani K. D.: 2005, ‘The implications of the new ISO 9000:2000 standards for certified organizations A review of anticipated benefits and implementation pitfalls’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54 (8), 645-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugler, P. and J. Y. J. Shi: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility for Developing Country Multinational Corporations: Lost War in Pertaining Global Competitiveness?’, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9801-5

  • Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J. and Anderson R.E.:2009, ‘Multivariate Data Analysis – a global perspective’ (Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, L.: 2005, The Essence of Multivariate Thinking – Basic Themes and Methods (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, New Jersey), 136 pp

  • Hillman, A.L.: 1994, ‘The transition from socialism: An overview from a political economy perspective’, European Journal of Political Economy 10, 191-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoven Stohs J. and Brannick T.: 1999, ‘Codes and Conduct: Predictors of Irish Managers’ Ethical Reasoning’, Journal of Business Ethics 22, 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Standardisation Organisation: 2004, ISO 14001:2004, Environmental Management Systems – Requirements with Guidance for Use, 5 pp

  • International Standardisation Organisation: 2005, ISO 9000:2005 Quality Management System – Fundamentals and Vocabulary, 13 pp

  • International Standardisation Organisation (ISO): 2009a, ‘Management System Standards – Cathalog’, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_standards/iso_9000_iso_14000/qmp/qmp-1.htm.

  • International Standardisation Organisation (ISO): 2009b, ‘Management System Standards Cathalog’, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_standards/iso_9000_iso_14000/business_benefits_of_iso_14001.htm.

  • ISO 26000 – Working Draft, Version 4.2 (WD4.2): 2008, The 6th Plenary Meeting of the ISO/TMB/WG SR (International Organization for Standardization/Technical Managing Board/Working Group for Social Responsibility), ISO/TMB/WG SR – IDTF N070 rev1 – Santiago WG Key Topics Discussion Document Santiago, September 2008

  • Karapetrovic, S. and Casadesu, M.: 2009, ‘Implementing environmental with other standardized management systems: Scope, sequence, time and integration’, Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 533–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilcullen, M. and Kooistra, J.O.: 1999, ‘At least do no harm: sources on the changing role of business ethics and corporate social responsibility’, Reference Services Review 27(2), 158-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J.: 2006, ‘Editorial: are sustainability science research societies strategic?’, Progress in Industrial Ecology - An International Journal 3(5), 409-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuljic, T.: 2003, `Yugoslavia's Workers Self-Management', http://www.republicart.net/disc/aeas/

  • Levis J.: 2006, ‘Adoption of corporate social responsibility codes by multinational companies’, Journal of Asian Economic 17, 50-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nargundkar, R.: 2004, Marketing Research: Text and Cases (Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi), 205 pp

  • O’Dwyer, B. and Madden G.: 2006, ‘Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A Survey of Code of Content and Enforcement Procedures’, Journal of Business Ethics 63, 217-236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan L. and Fairbrass J.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue’, Journal of Business Ethics 83, 745-758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panapanaan, V.M., L. Linnaned, M. Karvonen and V.H. Phan: 2003, ‘Roadmapping Corporate Social Responsibility in Finnish Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 44, 133-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, J.: 2006, ‘Viewpoint – Corporate responsibility in the global economy: a business case’, Society and Business Review 1 (2), 184-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M.: 2001,’The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour’, Journal of Business Ethics 32, 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., S. Kundu and W. Foster: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: MNCs to SMEs’, Working Paper, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, NY

  • Somers M.J.: 2001, ‘Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the Relationship Between Codes of Conduct, Employee Behaviour and Organizational Values’, Journal of Business Ethics 30, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan R.: 2005, ‘Code Integration: Alignment or Conflict?’, Journal of Business Ethics 59, 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson G. and Wood G.: 2008, ‘International standards of business conduct: framework and illustration’, European Business Review 20(3), 260-274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricker, R. and B. Sherring-Lucas: 2001, ISO 9001:2000 in Brief (Butterworth-Heinemann, Great Britain), 15 pp

  • UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs: 2007, ‘CSR and Developing Countries – What Scope for Government Action?’, Sustainable Development Inno- vations Briefs

  • Upchurch, M. and Cicmil, S.: 2004, ‘The political economy of management ‘knowledge transfer: Some insights from experience in Serbia and Montenegro’, South-East Europe Review 2, 101 - 120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing countries’, In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon & D. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp 473-479.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G.: 2002, `A Partnership Model of Corporate Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 40, 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. and M. Rimmer: 2003. Codes of Ethics: What are they Really and What Should they be?. International Journal of Value-Based Management 16:181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD): 2000, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense’, www.wbcsdch.org.

  • Wotruba T. R., Chonko L. B. and Terry W. L.: 2001, ‘The Impact of Ethics Code Familiarity on Manager Behaviour’, Journal of Business Ethics 33, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S.X., Shi, J. J. and Lou G.X.: 2007, ‘A synergetic model for implementing an integrated management system: an empirical study in China’, Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 1760-1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivana S. Mijatovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mijatovic, I.S., Stokic, D. The Influence of Internal and External Codes on CSR Practice: The Case of Companies Operating in Serbia. J Bus Ethics 94, 533–552 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0280-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0280-0

Keywords

Navigation