Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although risk and uncertainty are inevitable aspects of the sustainability problem, they are often neglected in the sustainability discourse, especially in the economic analysis of sustainable development. We argue that this deprives the sustainability discourse of interesting connections to risk management. We show that defining sustainability as the obligation to limit the risk of harming future individuals provides a framework in which tools from risk management, like mean-variance analysis, can be employed to analyze planning decisions and to calculate a risk-minimizing policy mix. Furthermore, we discuss whether such a notion of sustainability can be an ethically tenable sustainability concept and how a positive probability of harming future individuals might be defended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asheim, G. B. and K. A. Brekke: 2002, ‹Sustainability When Capital Management has Stochastic Consequences’, Social Choice and Welfare 19, 921–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayong Le Kama, A.: 2001, ‹Preservation and Uncertain Future Preferences’, Economic Theory 8, 745–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayong Le Kama, A. and K. Schubert: 2004, ‹Growth, Environment and Uncertain Future Preferences’, Environmental and Resource Economics 28, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G.: 2000, ‹An Axiomatic Approach to Choice under Uncertainty with Catastrophic Risks’, Resource and Energy Economics 22, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornia, G. A. and F. Stewart: 1995, ‹Two Errors of Targeting’, in D. van de Walle and K. Nead (eds.), Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore), pp. 350–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R.: 1981a, ‹What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 10, 185–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R.: 1981b, ‹What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 10, 283–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D.: 1967, ‹Resource Allocation and the Public Sector’, Yale Economic Essays 7, 45–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1986, Morals by Agreement (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. M., G. Chichilnisky and A. Beltratti: 1998, ‹Uncertain Future Preferences and Conservation’, in G. Chichilnisky and A. Vercelli (eds.), Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht), pp. 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysiak, F. C. and D. Krysiak: 2006, ‹Sustainability with Uncertain Future Preferences’, Environmental and Resource Economics 33, 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M.: 1952, ‹Portfolio Selection’, The Journal of Finance 7, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. and G. P. Todd: 1987, Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naga, R. A.: 2003, ‹The Allocation of Benefits under Uncertainty: A Decision Theoretic Framework’, Economic Modelling 20, 873–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.: 2004, ‹Squaring the Circle? Some Thoughts on the Idea of Sustainable Development’, Ecological Economics 48, 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. E.: 1996, Theories of Distributive Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and J. E. Stiglitz: 1970, Increasing Risk. 1. Definition, Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K.: 1982, Choice, Welfare, and Measurement (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K.: 1995, ‹The Political Economy of Targeting’, in D. van de Walle and K. Nead (eds.), Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore), pp. 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K.: 1999, Commodities and Capabilities (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: 1993, ‹The Contractarian Enterprise’, in D. Gauthier and R. Sugden (eds.), Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York), pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R.: 1975, ‹Distributive Justice, Welfare Economics, and the Theory of Fairness’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 10, 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. T.: 2000, ‹Sustainability as Intergenerational Fairness: Efficiency, Uncertainty, and Numerical Methods,’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82, 581–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editors of this special issue and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Basel, Peter Merian-Weg 6, 4002, Basel, Switzerland

    Frank C. Krysiak

Authors
  1. Frank C. Krysiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank C. Krysiak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krysiak, F.C. Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 3), 483–492 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0217-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0217-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation