Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 491–511 | Cite as

Discriminating Between ‘Meaningful Work’ and the ‘Management of Meaning’

  • Marjolein Lips-WiersmaEmail author
  • Lani Morris


The interest in meaningful work has significantly increased over the last two decades. Much of␣the associated managerial research has focused on researching ways to ‹provide and manage meaning’ through leadership or organizational culture. This stands in sharp contrast with the literature of the humanities which suggests that meaningfulness does not need to be provided, as the distinct feature of a human being is that␣he or she has an intrinsic ‹will to meaning’. The research that has been done based on the humanistic paradigm has been quite fragmented. This article aims to address these gaps through an action research project that actively involved participants in the process of affirming and uncovering the meaningfulness of their work. Our findings contribute to current organizational scholarship and practice as they (a) enable scholars to clearly distinguish ‹meaningful work’ from ‹the management of mean- ing’, (b) bring together the various sources of meaningful work in one framework and show their relationship with each other, (c) clearly show the importance of engaging with both the inspiration towards the ideal as well as the often less than perfect self and the organizational reality in which meaning gets expressed and (d) contribute to our understanding of how to engage individuals in conversations about meaningful work that are not prescriptive or exclusive, but that also show where meanings are commonly held.

Key words

action research management of meaning meaningful work meaningless work 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aktouf, O.: 1992, ‹Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism?’, Academy of Management Review 17(3), 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashforth, B. E., and D. Vaidyanath.: 2002, ‹Work organizations as secular religions’, Journal of Management Inquiry 11(4), 359 - 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayers, D. F., C. Miller-Dyce, and D. Carlone: 2008, ‹Security, dignity, caring relationships and meaningful work’, Community College Review 35(4), 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakan, D.: 1966, The duality of human Existence: Isolation and communion in Western man (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  5. Battlista, J., and R. Almond: 1973, ‹The development of meaning in life’, Psychiatry 36, 409–427.Google Scholar
  6. Bird, F. B., and J. A. Waters: 1989, ‹The moral muteness of managers’, California Management Review 32(1), 73–88.Google Scholar
  7. Bowie, N. E.: 1998, ‹A Kantian theory of meaningful work’, The Journal of Business Ethics 17(9/10), 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner, J.: 1990, Acts of Meaning (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA). .Google Scholar
  9. Casey, C.: 1999, ‹Come and join our family: Discipline and Integration in corporate organizational culture’, Human Relations 52(2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chisholm, R. F., and M. Elden: 1993, ‹Features of emerging action research’, Human Relations 46, 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciulla, J. B.: 1998, Leadership and the problem of bogus empowerment (Quorum Books, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
  12. Clark, J.: 2006, ‹A discussion paper about ‹meaning’ in the nursing literature on spirituality: An interpretation of meaning as ‹ultimate concern’ using the work of Paul Tillich’, International Journal of Nursing Studies 43(7), 915–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, D. E.: 1990, Existentialism: a reconstruction (Blackwell, Oxford).Google Scholar
  14. Costea, B., N. Crump, and K.Amiridis: 2008, ‹Managerialism, the therapeutic habitus and the self in contemporary organizing’, Human Relations 61(5), 661–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Driver, M.: 2007, ‹A spiritual turn in organizations: meaning making or meaningless?’, The Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion 4(1), 56–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fineman, S.: 1983, ‹Work meanings, non-work, and the taken-for-granted’, Journal of Management Studies 20(2), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frankl, V. E.: 1959, Man’s search for meaning (Pocket Books, New York).Google Scholar
  18. Frankl, V. E.: 1969, The will to meaning (New American Library, New York).Google Scholar
  19. Gardner, H.: 1993, Intelligence reframed, Multiple intelligences for the 21st century (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  20. Giacalone, R. A., and C. Jurkiewicz: 2003, ‹Toward a science of workplace spirituality’, in R. A. Giacalone and C. Jurkiewicz (eds.), Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
  21. Hodson, R.: 2001, Dignity at work (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  22. Hsing, Y.: 1998, Being good: Buddhist ethics for everyday life (Weatherhill, New York).Google Scholar
  23. Hymer, S.: 2004, ‹Being in the moment and shifting self-perspectives’, The American Journal of Psycholanalysis 64(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  25. Kekes, J.: 1986, ‹The informed will and the meaning of life’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, N.: 1998, ‹Template analysis’, in G. Symon and C. Cassell (eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  27. Klinger, E. (ed.): 1998, The search for meaning in evolutionary perspective and its clinical applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ). .Google Scholar
  28. Korotkov, D. L.: 1998, ‹The sense of coherence: Making sense out of chaos’, in P. T. P. Wong and P. Fry (eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ). pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
  29. Lamont, G.: 2002, The spirited business, success stories of soul friendly companies (Hodder and Stoughton, London).Google Scholar
  30. Langle, A.: 2003, ‹Burn-out. Existential meaning and possibilities of prevention’, European Psychotherapy 4(1), 129–143.Google Scholar
  31. Lips-Wiersma, M. S.: 2002a, ‹Analysing the career concerns of spiritually oriented people: lessons for contemporary organizations’, Career Development International 7(7), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lips-Wiersma, M. S.: 2002b, ‹The influence of spirituality on career behavior’, Journal of Management Development 21(7), 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luscher, L. S., and M. W. Lewis: 2008, ‹Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox’, The Academy of Management Journal 51(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
  34. Marshall, J.: 2001, ‹Self-reflective inquiry practices’, in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (Sage, London), pp. 433–439.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, M. W.: 2000, Meaningful work, Rethinking professional ethics (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  36. May, D. R., R. L. Gilson,, and L. M.Harter: 2004, ‹The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michaelson, C.: 2008, ‹Work and the most terrible life’, Journal of Business Ethics 77, 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitroff, I. I.: 2003, ‹Do not promote religion under the guise of spirituality’, Organization 10(2), 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muirhead, R.: 2004, Just Work (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  40. Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State & Utopia (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  41. Nyberg, D.: 2008, ‹The morality of everyday activities: Not the right, but the good thing to do’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parry, K. W., and A. Bryman: 2006, ‹Leadership in Organizations’, in S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence and W. R. Nord (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, second edition (Sage, London), pp. 447–468.Google Scholar
  43. Phelps, E. S.: 1997, Rewarding Work (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  44. Pines, M.: 2002, ‹The female entrepreneur: Burnout using a psychodynamic existential approach’, Clinical Case Studies 1(2), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pratt, M. G., and B. E. Ashforth: 2003, ‹Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work’, in K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton and R. E. Quinn (eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship (Berret-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco), pp. 309–327).Google Scholar
  46. Reason, P.: 2006, ‹Choice and quality in action research practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry 15(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reason, P., and H. Bradbury (eds.): 2001, Handbook of action research, Participative inquiry and practice (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  48. Reason, P., and B. C. Goodwin: 1999, ‹Toward a science of qualities in organizations: Lessons from complexity theory and postmodern biology’, Concepts and transformations 4(3), 281–317.Google Scholar
  49. Rifkin, J.: 1996, The End Of Work (Tarcher/Putnam, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Sennett, R.: 1998, The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  51. Sheldrake, P.: 1995, Spirituality and History (SPCK, London).Google Scholar
  52. Sievers, B.: 1994, Work, death and life itself: Essays on management and organization (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Google Scholar
  53. Singer, P.: 1995, How are we to live? (Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY).Google Scholar
  54. Spreitzer, G.: 1995, ‹Psychological empowerment in the work place: Dimensions, measurement, and validation’, Academy of Management Journal 38, 1442–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steingard, D. S.: 2005, ‹Spiritually-Informed Management Theory, Towards Profound Possibilites for Inquiry and Transformation’, Journal of Management Inquiry 14(3), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tillich, P. (ed.); 1987, Religion and secular culture (Collins, London).Google Scholar
  57. Torbert, B.: 2004, Action Inquiry, The secret of timely and transforming leadership (Berret-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  58. Wadsworth, Y.: 2001, ‹The mirror, the magnifying glass, the compass and the map: Facilitating participatory action research’, in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), The handbook of action research. Participative inquiry in practice (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  59. Watson, J.: 2005, ‹A meta reflection on reflective practice and where it leads’. in D. Freshwater and C. Johns (eds.), Transforming nursing through reflective practice. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 7-10.Google Scholar
  60. Willmott, H.: 1993, ‹Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations’, Journal of Management Studies 40(4), 515–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolfe, A.: 1997, ‹The Moral Meaning of Work’, Journal of Soci-Economics 26(6), 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wong, P. T. P., and P. Fry: 1998, The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  63. Woodhead, L., P. Fletcher,.H. Kawanami, and D. Smith: 2002, Religions in the modern world, Traditions and Transformations (Routledge, London).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Independent Leadership and Sustainability ConsultantNapierNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations