Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of Cultural Values on Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s Dimensions to Korean Public Relations Practitioners

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and public relations practitioners’ perceptions of corporate social respon- sibility (CSR) in South Korea. The survey on Korean public relations practitioners revealed that, although Hofstede’s dimensions significantly affect public relations practitioners’ perceptions of CSR, social traditionalism values had more explanatory power than cultural dimensions in explaining CSR attitudes. The results suggest that practitioners’ fundamental ideas about the corporation’s role in society seem to be more important than their cultural values to understand public relations practitioners’ CSR attitudes in Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkowitza, D., & Lee, J. (2004). Media Relations in Korea: Cheong Between Journalist and Public Relations Practitioner. Public Relations Review, 30(4), 431–437. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, J.G., Lu, L.-C., Rose, G.M., & Vitell, S.J. (2001). Ethical Sensitivity to Stakeholder Interests: A Cross-cultural Comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 190–202. doi:10.1177/03079459994551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, C.M., & Kato, H.K. (2003). The Confucian Roots of Business Kyosei. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 317–333. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005799.31770.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, L.A. (2002). Professionalism and Social Responsibility: Foundations of Public Relations Ethics. Communication Yearbook, 26, 230–265. doi:10.1207/s15567419cy2601_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P. M., I. G. Kwon, P. A. Stoeberl and R. Baumhart: 2003, ‹A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers. India, Korea and the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(3), 263–287. doi:10.1023/A:1025501426590

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C.E. (2000). Differences between Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis. Public Relations Review, 26(3), 363–380. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00053-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culture and Religion Vital to Middle East CSR Model: 2007, Business & the Environment with ISO 14000 Updates 18(1), 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutlip, S.M., Center, A.H., & Broom, G.M., 1985 Effective Public Relations, 6th edition. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, K. (2000). Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It. Business & Society 39(2), 210. doi:10.1177/000765030003900205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esrock, S.L., & Leichty, G.B. (1998). Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-presentation or Agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.C. 2006, Corporation, Be Good!: The Story of Corporate Social Responsibility (Dog Ear Publishing, Indianapolis, IN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (Pitman, Boston, MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13

  • Fukuyama, F. 1995, Trust (The Free Press, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L.V. 1976, Survey of Interpersonal Values-revised Manual (Science R esearch Associates, Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J.E., & Hunt, T. 1984, Managing Public Relations (Rinehart and Winston, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haruta, A., & Hallahan, K. (2003). Cultural Issues in Airline Crisis Communications. Asian Journal of Communication, 13(2), 122–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1984, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Abbreviated edition (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)

  • Hofstede, G. 1991, Culture and Organization: Software of the Mind (McGraw Hill, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2001, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edition (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Bond, M.H. (1988). The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.J., 2005 Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2nd edition (McGraw Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, S., & Kim, Y. (2004). Media or Personal Relations? Exploring Media Relations Dimensions in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 292–306

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O.P., & Benet-Martinez, V., 2000 ‹Measurement: Reliability, Construct, Validation, and Scale Construction’. in Reis and Judd (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY) pp. 339-369

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, B.E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311. doi:10.1023/A:1021237420663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, L.R. (1989). Credibility, Public Relations and Social Responsibility. Public Relations Review, 15(2), 34–40. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(89)80052-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just Good Business: A Special Report on Corporate Social Responsibility (2008, January 19). The Economist

  • Kim, Y. (2003). Ethical Standards and Ideology among Korean Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 209–223. doi:10.1023/A:1022281507601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Cha, H., & Kim, J. (2008). Developing a Crisis Management Index: Applications in South Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(3), 328–355. doi:10.1080/10627260801962962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Hon, L.C. (1998). Craft and Professional Models of Public Relations and Their Relation to Job Satisfaction among Korean Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(3), 155–175. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-Y., & Reber, B.H. (2008). ‹Public Relations’ Place in Corporate Social Responsibility: Practitioners Define Their Role’. Public Relations Review, 34, 337–342. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Etang, J. 2006. ‹Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Ethics’, in L’Etang and Pieczka (eds.), Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice (LEA, NJ), pp. 405-421

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. (2001). ‹Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-cultural Comparison’. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57–72. doi:10.1023/A:1006433928640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.N., & Nakayama, T.K., 2000 Intercultural Communication in Contexts. (Mayfield, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. 2006. ‹Why do Companies Engage in Corporate Social Responsibility? Background, Reasons and Basic Concepts’, in Hennigfeld, Pohl and Tolhurst (eds.), The ICCA Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex), pp. 3-46

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. (2002). ‹Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith – A Failure of Analysis’. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkin, R. 2005, ‹Measuring Culture: The Utility of Verifying Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions’, in Starosta and Chen (eds.), International and Intercultural Annual (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), pp. 257-274

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Y., & Franke, G.R. (2000). ‹Cultural Influences on Agency Practitioners’ Ethical Perceptions: A Comparison of Korea and the U.S.’. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 51–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrack, P. (2007). Individual Personality Factors that Affect Normative Beliefs about the Rightness of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 46(1), 33–62. doi:10.1177/0007650306290312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R.W. (1975). Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39(6), 607–619. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. 1994, Psychometric Theory, 3rd edition (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, M. 2006. ‹Corporate Culture and Csr – How They Interrelate and Consequences for Successful Implementation’, in Hennigfeld, Pohl and Tolhurst (eds.), The ICCA Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex), pp. 47-59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, Y. (2002). Global Public Relations: A Cross-cultural Study of the Excellence Theory in South Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(3), 159–184. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1403_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D.P., & Reidenbach, R.E. (1987). Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap between Concept and Application. Journal of Marketing, 51, 44–58. doi:10.2307/1251143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (1986). ‹Public Relations Practitioners’ Views of Corporate Social Responsibility’. The Journalism Quarterly, 63(4), 740–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. J.: 2006 Analysis of the Perception and Reality of Integrated Communications (IMC) in Corporate Public Relations: A Study of South Korea, unpublished master’s thesis (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL)

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S.J., & Leelakulthanit, O. (1994). A Cross-cultural Study of Moral Philosophies, Ethical Perceptions and Judgments: A Comparison of American and Thai Marketers. International Marketing Review, 11(6), 65–78. doi:10.1108/02651339410073015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriramesh, K., & White, J., 1992 ‹Societal Culture and Public Relations’. in J. E. Grunig (ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. (Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ), pp. 597-614

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, S. (2006). Cultural Differences in Determining the Ethical Perception and Decision-making of Future Accounting Professionals: A Comparison between Accounting Students from Taiwan and the United States. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(1), 147–158

    Google Scholar 

  • The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-free Dimensions of Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143–164. doi:10.1177/0022002187018002002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, G.M., & Taylor, M. (1999). What Cultural Values Influence American Public Relations Practitioners? Public Relations Review, 25(4), 433–449. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)00030-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., Nwachukwu, S.L., & Barnes, J.H. (1993). ‹The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-making: An Application of Hofstede’s Typology’. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 753–760. doi:10.1007/BF00881307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., Paolillo, J.G.P., & Thomas, J.L. (2003). The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Study of Marketing Professionals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 63–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Voich, D. 1995, ‹Comparative Empirical Analysis of Cultural Values and Perceptions of PoliticalEconomy Issues’, (Praeger Press, Westport, CT)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C.: 1996, ‹Overcoming the Separation Thesis: The Need for a Reconsideration of Business and Society Research’, Business and Society 35(1), 89–118

  • Williamson, D. (2002). ‹Forward from a Critique of Hofstede’s Model of National Culture’. Human Relations, 55(11), 1373–1395

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Taylor, M., & Chen, M. (2001). Exploring Societal and Cultural Influences on Taiwanese Public Relations. Public Relations Review, 27, 317–336. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00089-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S., 1994 ‹Collectivism among the Japanese: A Perspective from the Self’. in Kim, Triandis, Kagitcibasi, Choi and Yoon (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications. (Sage Publications, London), pp. 175-188

    Google Scholar 

  • Yum, J.O. 1987. ‹Korean Philosophy and Communication’, in D. L. Kincaid (ed.), Communications Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives (Academic Press, San Diego, CA), pp. 71-86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yungwook Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Kim, SY. The Influence of Cultural Values on Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s Dimensions to Korean Public Relations Practitioners. J Bus Ethics 91, 485–500 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0095-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0095-z

Key words

Navigation