Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 207–221 | Cite as

Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs

  • Angeloantonio Russo
  • Francesco Perrini


The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been widely investigated, but a generally accepted theoretical framework does not yet exist. This paper argues that the idiosyncrasies of large firms and SMEs explains the different approaches to CSR, and that the notion of social capital is a more useful way of understanding the CSR approach of SMEs, whereas stakeholder theory more closely addresses the CSR approach of large firms. Based on the extant literature, we present a comparison of large firm and SME idiosyncrasies suggesting that both consolidated and emerging strategic orientations toward responsible behaviours exist. Idiosyncrasies of large firms and SMEs are also discussed to provide an assessment of the firm’s strategic CSR orientation, suggesting the key drivers upon which CSR strategies must be based. A twofold consideration emerges. First, the CSR–SME relationship could be better explained if the notion of social capital is taken into account, but this should also be accompanied by a stakeholder view of the SME; second, social capital and stakeholder theory should be taken as alternative ways of explaining CSR in both large firms and SMEs.


corporate social responsibility (CSR) idiosyncrasies small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) social capital stakeholder theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackerman, R. W. 1975, The Social Challenge to Business (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. doi: 10.2307/4134367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo, L., & Easton, G.1999. “A Relational Resource Perspective on Social Capital”, in R.T.A.J. Leenders and S.M. Gabbay (ed.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability (Kluwer, Boston, MA), pp. 68-87.Google Scholar
  4. Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361–379. doi: 10.2307/2098345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berle, A., & Means, G. 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, H.P. 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D., & King, J. (1982). Small Business Ethics: Influences and Perceptions. Journal of Small Business Management, 20(1), 11–26.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, R.S. 1992, Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. doi: 10.2307/257850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, C.R. (2000). Ethical Issues in International Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Dyadic Examination. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 191–208. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00016-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, C.R., & Jennings, M.M. (2002a). Social Responsibility and Supply Chain Relationships. Transportation Research, Part E, 38E(1), 37–52. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00008-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, C.R., & Jennings, M.M. (2002b). Logistics Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 145–180.Google Scholar
  13. CEC. 2001, Green Paper Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium).Google Scholar
  14. CEC.2002, European SMEs and Social and Environmental Responsibility (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium).Google Scholar
  15. CEC.2006, Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on CSR (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium).Google Scholar
  16. Clark, J.M. 1939, Social Control of Business (McGraw Hill, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 95–120. doi: 10.1086/228943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coleman, J.S. 1990, Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  19. Curran, J., & Blackburn, R.1994, Small Firms and Local Economic Networks: The Death of the Local Economy? (Paul Chapman, London, UK).Google Scholar
  20. Curran, J., Rutherfoord, R., & Lloyd Smith, S. (2000). Is There a Business Community?: Explaining the Non-Participation of Small Business in Local Economic Development. Local Economy, 15(2), 128–143. doi: 10.1080/02690940050122686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322. doi: 10.2307/255331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi: 10.2307/258887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunfee, T.W. (1991). Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 23–51. doi: 10.2307/3857591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunham, L., Freeman, R.E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42.Google Scholar
  25. Enderle, G. (2004). “Global Competition and Corporate Responsibilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 14(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, E.R. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  27. Friedman, M. 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  28. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glaeser, E. L., D. Laibson and B. Sacerdote: 2000, The Economic Approach to Social Capital. NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA, p. 7728.Google Scholar
  30. Graafland, J., van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and Instruments for Organising CSR by Small and Large Businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 45–60. doi: 10.1023/A:1026240912016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic-Action and Social-Structure – the Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grayson, D. 2004, “How CSR Contribute to the Competitiveness of Europe in a More Sustainable World”, The World Bank Institute and the CSR Resource Centre (Netherlands), 1-5.Google Scholar
  33. Greening, D.W., & Turban, D.B. (2000). Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254–280. doi: 10.1177/000765030003900302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Habisch, A., H.P. Meister and R. Schmidpeter: 2001, Corporate Citizenship as Investing in Social Capital (Logos-Verlag, Berlin, Germany).Google Scholar
  35. Hasnas, J. (1998). The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 19–42. doi: 10.2307/3857520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., & Dunfee, T.W. (2002). The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2), 110–125.Google Scholar
  37. Jenkins, H. (2004). A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37–57.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, T.M. (1980). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67.Google Scholar
  39. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility. Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  40. Kreps, T.J. 1940, Measurement of the Social Performance of Business (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  41. Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 251–273. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9183-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maloni, M.J., & Brown, M.E. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9038-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manne, H.G., & Wallich, H.C.1972, The Modern Corporation and Social Responsibility (American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  44. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‹Implicit’ and ‹Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.Google Scholar
  45. Murillo, D., & Lozano, J.M. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in Their Own Words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227–240. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9181-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ortiz Avram, D., & Kühne, S. (2008). Implementing Responsible Business Behavior from a Strategic Management Perspective: Developing a Framework for Austrian SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 463–475. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9897-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paldam, M. (2000). Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(5), 629–653. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perrini, F., A. Russo and A. Tencati: 2007, ‹CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(3), 285-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perrini, F. and A. Russo: 2008, ‹Illycaffè: Value Creation through Responsible Supplier Relationships’, Journal of Business Ethics Education 5(Special Issue), 83-114.Google Scholar
  50. Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder Legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
  51. Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  52. Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S.2002a, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  53. Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S. (2002b). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.Google Scholar
  54. Preston, L.E., & Post, J.E. 1975, Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  55. Putnam, R. 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, NJ).Google Scholar
  56. Putnam, R. 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  57. Pyke, F., Becattini, G., & Sengenberger, W. 1990, Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  58. Roberts, S., Lawson, R., & Nicholls, J. (2006). Generating Regional-Scale Improvements in SME Corporate Responsibility Performance: Lessons from Responsibility Northwest. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 275–286. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9184-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Russo, A. and A. Tencati: 2009, ‹Formal Vs. Informal CSR Strategies. Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(Supplement 2), 339-353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spence, L.J. (1999). “Does Size Matter? The State of the Art in Small Business Ethics”, Business Ethics. A European Review 8(3), 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spence, L.J., Habisch, A., & Schmidpeter, R. 2004, Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, UK/New York, NY).Google Scholar
  62. Spence, L.J., Jeurissen, R., & Rutherfoord, R. (2000). Small Business and the Environment in the Uk and the Netherlands: Toward Stakeholder Cooperation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(4), 945–965. doi: 10.2307/3857841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spence, L.J., & Lozano, J.F. (2000). Communicating About Ethics with Small Firms: Experiences from the U.K. And Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1), 43–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1006417425446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spence, L.J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1023/A:1026205109290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spence, L.J., & Schmidpeter, R. (2003). SMEs, Social Capital and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1-2), 93–108. doi: 10.1023/A:1024176613469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Spence, L.J., Schmidpeter, R., & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Germany and the Uk. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1023/A:1026284727037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tencati, A., A. Russo and V. Quaglia: 2008, ‹Unintended Consequences of CSR: Protectionism and Collateral Damage in Global Supply Chains: The Case of Vietnam’, Corporate Governance. The International Journal of Business in Society 8(4), 518-531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tilley, F. (2000). “Small Firm Environmental Ethics: How Deep Do They Go?”, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 9(1), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van de Ven, B., & Jeurissen, R. (2005). Competing Responsibly. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 299–317.Google Scholar
  70. Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett, D. (1997). Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behaviour in Small Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 1625–1636. doi: 10.1023/A:1022452502299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Welsh, J.A., & White, J.F. (1981). A Small Business Is Not a Little Big Business. Harvard Business Review, 59(4), 18–32.Google Scholar
  72. Wilson, E. (1980). Social Responsibility of Business: What Are the Small Business Perspectives? Journal of Small Business Management, 18(July), 17–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Parthenope UniversityNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Bocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations