Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Attitudes of Accounting Practitioners: Are Rank and Ethical Attitudes Related?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We address a previous finding in the business ethics literature in which accounting professionals in higher rank levels, i.e., “manager” or “partner” of auditing firms, appear to have lower moral reasoning ability than their junior counterparts. Prior investigations have relied upon a similar methodology for estimating ethical beliefs, namely testing “moral reasoning ability” using either the Moral Judgment Interview or Defining Issues Test. In the present study, we use a multiple vignettes approach to test for the existence of the inverse rank-ethical beliefs effect. With only 2 of the 30 vignettes resulting in both managers and partners being more accepting of the ethically charged behaviors, the results presented here using this alternative methodology are generally not supportive of the inverse rank-ethical beliefs phenomenon. We also use a multivariate analysis in order to control for demographic characteristics. Our results suggest that the most robust predictor of ethical attitudes among accounting practitioners is age, not rank within a firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, M. B.: 1987, ‹Moral Development and Accounting Education’, Journal of Accounting Education (Spring), 27–43. doi:10.1016/0748-5751(87)90036-4.

  • Armstrong, J.S., & Overton, T.S. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. doi:10.2307/3150783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.: 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables, (John Wiley and Sons: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. and Y. Ugras: 1998, ‹Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1117-1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, S.: 1990, ‹Is Gender Germane?’, Health Progress, 21–24.

  • Cavanaugh, G. F. and D. F. Fritzsche: 1985, ‹Using Vignettes in Business Ethics Research’, in Preston, L. E. (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Inc.: Greenwich, CN), 279-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.: 1966, Religion and the Moral Standards of American Businessmen, (South-Western Publishing Co.: Cincinnati).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A. and L. Kohlberg: 1987, The Measurement of Moral Judgment (Cambridge University Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, S. J. and T. L. N. Emerson: 2004, `Business Ethics and Religion: Religiosity as a Predictor of Ethical Awareness Among Students', Journal of Business Ethics 50(4), 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, S. J. and T. L. N. Emerson: 2006, `Changing Ethical Attitudes: The Case of Enron and ImClone Scandals', Social Science Quarterly 87(2), 395–410

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F.: 1991, ‹Scale Development: Theory and Applications’, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 26 (Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA).

  • Elias, R. Z: 2002, ‹Determinants of Earnings: Management Ethics Among Accountants’, Journal of Business Ethics, September, 40, 33-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T. L. N., S. J. Conroy and C. W. Stanley: 2007, `Ethical Attitudes of Accountants: Recent Evidence from a Practitioners' Survey', Journal of Business Ethics 71(1), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eynon, G., N. T. Hill and K. T. Stevens: 1997, ‹Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession’, Journal of Business Ethics 16 (September), 1297-1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. and H. Becker: 1982, ‹Business Ethics of Future Marketing Managers’, Journal of Marketing Education (Fall), 2–7.

  • Harris, J.: 1991, ‹Ethical Values and Decision Processes of Business and Non-Business Students: A Four-Group Study’, Journal of Legal Studies Education 9, 215-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S.: 1990, ‹Commentary on an Empirical Investigation of a General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18(2), 173-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., D. W. Massey and L. Thorne. 2003. ‹Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning: Insights from Past Research and Implications for the Future’, Journal of Accounting Literature 22, 45 – 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C. 1988, From a Broken Web: Separation, Sexism and Self. (Boston: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice (Harper & Row: San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1984, The Psychology of Moral Development : The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages (Harper & Row: San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, J. C. and D. W. Finn: 1992, ‹A Model of Auditors’ Ethical Decision Processes’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Supplement) 11, 33-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J. G., J. A. McKinney and C. W. Moore: 1989, ‹Ethics in Small Business’, Journal of Small Business Management (January), 27–31.

  • Maddala, G.: 1983, Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A.: 1990, ‹Ethical Judgments in Accounting: A Cognitive-Developmental Perspective’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 191-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A.: 1992, ‹Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(3/4), 239-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A. and D. R. L. Gabhart: 1993. Ethical Reasoning in Accounting and Auditing, (Canadian General Accountants’ Research Foundation: Vancouver, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A. and D. R. L. Gabhart: 1994, ‹Ethical Reasoning Research in the Accounting and Auditing Professions’, in Rest, J. R. and D. Narvaez (Eds.) Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Hillsdale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1979) Development in Judging Moral Issues. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M. K.: 1994, ‹An Analysis of the Association of Traditional Demographic Variables with the Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors’, Journal of Accounting Education 12(1), 1 – 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L. and E. F. Oakley: 1997, ‹Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 16: 37-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. T. and D. G. Fisher: 1998, ‹An Examination of the Validity of a New Measure of Moral Judgment’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 10, 138-158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Stephen J. Conroy or Tisha L. N. Emerson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conroy, S.J., Emerson, T.L.N. & Pons, F. Ethical Attitudes of Accounting Practitioners: Are Rank and Ethical Attitudes Related?. J Bus Ethics 91, 183–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0076-2

Keywords

Navigation