Skip to main content
Log in

Limiting Laissez Faire Profits: The Financial Implications

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional corporate finance endorses the principle of stockholder wealth maximization as the purpose of business. In light of recent scandals and legislation, businesses are increasingly expected to use financial resources in a manner which benefits society and not just the owners of the firm. This imputation of a corporate soul will necessarily reduce investor returns, which has at least two major financial implications for the firm and the economy. The first is that it may cause investors to change their required rates of return and thereby change the amount of capital available to firms (in␣particular), and the economy (in general). The second is that it may implicitly replace equity with debt in the capital structure of firms, with all that implies for financing and corporate governance. The purpose of this article is to examine these implications and evaluate their sometimes counterintuitive consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berle, A.A., & Means, G.C.(1932), The modern corporation and private property, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R.A., & Myers, S.C.(2000), Principles of corporate finance, (6th Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B.: 1995, ‹Best of Both Worlds: Milton Friedman Reminisces About his Career as an Economist and his Lifetime “Avocation” as a Spokesman for Freedom’, Interview with Reason Magazine, http://www.ideachannel.com/Friedman.htm. Accessed 7 June 2007

  • Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Company, 320 U.S., 591 (1944) at 603

  • Freeman, R.E. (1997). “A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation,” in T. Bauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), in Ethical Theory and Business, (5th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970), The social responsibility of business is to increase profits, The New York Times magazine, 33 (Sept. 13), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaccotto, C., Santerre, R., & Vernon, J.(2005), “Drug prices and r&d investment behavior in the pharmaceutical industry,” in Journal of Law and Economics 195, 214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitman, L. (2000), Principles of Managerial Finance. (9th Ed), Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havenner, A., T. Hazlett and Z. Leng: 2001, ‹The Effects␣of Rate Regulation on Mean Returns and Non-Diversifiable Risk: The Case of Cable Television’, Review of Industrial Organization 19, 149–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G.: 1953, ‹The Analysis of Economic Time Series, Part 1 Prices’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 96, 11–25. For a detailed discussion of market efficiency, see Megginson, W. L.: 1997, Corporate Finance Theory, Chap. 3 (Addison Wesley Longman, Boston)

  • Markowitz, H.M. (1952), “Portfolio selection,” in Journal of Finance 7, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W.L., & Smart, S.B.(2006), Introduction to Corporate Finance. Mason, Ohio: Thompson/South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1977). Debt and taxes. The Journal of Finance, 32, 261–276. doi:10.2307/2326758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeldt, V. (ed.): 1994, Webster's New World Dictionary, 3rd Edition (Prentice Hall, New York)

  • Rand, A.: 1957/1999, Atlas Shrugged (Penguin Group, New York)

  • Revera, N.: 2007, The Episcopal Voice, vol. 18 (Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, New York), 5:2

  • Smith, A.: 2007, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Library of Economics and Liberty), http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/Smith/smWN2.html. Accessed 7 June 2007

  • Warner, J.B. (1977). Bankruptcy costs: some evidence. The Journal of Finance, 26, 337–348. doi:10.2307/2326766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L.A. (1990). Bankruptcy resolution: direct costs and violation of priority of claims. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 285–314. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(90)90058-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, D.: 2006, California and the West; Healthcare Costs Spur Calls for Limits on Profits; State Officials Target Insurers’ use of Funds as the Debate Turns from Services to Finances, Chap. 1 (Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert Kierulff.

Additional information

The authors wish to express their appreciation to an anonymous reviewer who made several helpful comments on the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kierulff, H., Learned, G. Limiting Laissez Faire Profits: The Financial Implications. J Bus Ethics 90, 425–436 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0053-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0053-9

Key words

Navigation