Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Glass Houses? Market Reactions to Firms Joining the UN Global Compact

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine market reactions to publicly held multinational firms announcing their affiliation with the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC). The UNGC is a voluntary initiative to support four areas of United Nations viz. Human Rights, Labor, Environmental, and Anti-Corruption. Because firms must file annual Communication on Progress (COP) reports toward these initiatives, we argue this creates a differentiating transparency of interest to stakeholders. Using a sample of 175 global firms, we find support to the theory for joining the UNGC. Returns differ markedly, however, between multinational firms headquartered in the United States (negative) and Europe (positive). We also find that failing to complete the annual COP generates a negative market reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akerlof, G.A. (1970). ‹The market for ‹lemons’: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. doi:10.2307/1879431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annan, K. (1999). Business and the U.N. Vital Speeches of the Day, 65(9), 260–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J.J. (1998). The event study methodology since 1969. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 11(2), 111–137. doi:10.1023/A:1008295500105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacconiere, W.G., & Patten, D.M. (1994). Environmental Disclosures, Regulatory Costs, and Changes in Firm Value. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(3), 357–377. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N.E., & Werhane, P.H. 2005, Management Ethics. Blackwell, Malden, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, C. (2004). European perspectives on human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 14(4), 365–382. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The Public Disclosure of Environmental Performance Information—A Dual Test of Media Agenda Setting Theory and Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Business Review, 29, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Warner, J. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D., & Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of The United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 163–176. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9265-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A.: 2003, ‹21st Century Slaves’, National Geographic.com. Accessed 7 May 2007, http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0309/feature1/.

  • DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E.F. 1991, ‹Efficient capital markets: II’. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddersen, T.J., & Gilligan, W. (2001). Saints and markets: Activists and the supply of credence goods. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 149–171. doi:10.1162/105864001300122584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, W.J., Smith, K.G., & Grimm, C.M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement; A Study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 372–388. doi:10.2307/257009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., Carroll, G.R., & Hannan, M.T. (1983). The Liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710. doi:10.2307/2094928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., & McVae, J. 2001, ‹A stakeholder approach to strategic management’. in: M.A. Hitt, R.E. Freeman, and J.S. Harrison (eds.). Handbook of strategic management. 189-207, Malden MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting Auditing Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. doi:10.1108/09513579510146996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1990). Capital structure and the informational role of debt. The Journal of Finance, 45(2), 321–349. doi:10.2307/2328660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil, O., & Robertson, S. (1991). Toward a theory of competitive market signaling: A Research agenda. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 403–418. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M.C., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management team backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 1–25. doi:10.1002/smj.495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janney, J.J., & Folta, T.B. (2006). Moderating effects of investor experience on the signaling value of private equity placements. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 27–44. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G. (2005). The global compact; selected experiences and reflections. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1-2), 69–79. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3413-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G., & Levin, D. (2003). The global compact network: An historic experiment in learning and action. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 151–181. doi:10.1111/1467-8594.00159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E.L. (2003). The strange history of employer-sponsored child care: Interested actors, uncertainty, and the transformation of law in organizational fields. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 606–649. doi:10.1086/379631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The Case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81. doi:10.2307/259037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. E. and H. Pyle: 1977, `Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation', Journal of Finance 32(2), 371–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. K.: 1994, The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure. Presented at Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.

  • Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marple, D. (1982). Technological innovation and organizational survival: a Population ecology study of nineteenth-century American railroads. The Sociological Quarterly, 23(1), 107–116. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1982.tb02223.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (1997). Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 626–657. doi:10.2307/257056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A.S., Amburgey, T.L., & Stearns, T.M. (1990). Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 689–713. doi:10.2307/2393514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. doi:10.2307/258610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D.M. (1992). Intra–Industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A Note on legitimacy theory. Accounting Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90042-Q.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D.M. (2002). Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: An examination of the impact of tri data availability. Accounting Forum, 26(2), 152–171. doi:10.1111/1467-6303.t01-1-00007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D.M., & Trompeter, G. (2003). Corporate responses to political costs: An examination of the relation between environmental disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 83–94. doi:10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00087-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M.A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A Resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 458–483. doi:10.2307/2393299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. doi:10.2307/2393988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L. (2008). ‹A reluctant stakeholder? On the perception of corporate social responsibility among European trade unions’, Business Ethics. European Review Chichester, England, 17(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (1994). The Social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry 1895—1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 29–44. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G. (1985). The United States and the United Nations: Toward a new realism. International Organization, 39(2), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511. doi:10.2307/2392880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 1994, ‹Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches’, In W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer, (eds.) Institutional environment and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism, San Francisco, CA, Sage pp. 81-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A.L. 1965, ‹Social structures and Organizations’, In J.M. March, (ed.) Handbook of organizations, Chicago, Rand McNally, pp. 142-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T.E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R.C. (1999). ‹Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349. doi:10.2307/2666998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, A.K., & Inkpen, A.C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 350–363. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Global Compact: 2007, ‹Issues’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/issues. Accessed 17 March 2007.

  • United State Department of State Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons: 2007, ‹2007 Trafficking in Persons Report’, http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2007/. Accessed 7 May 2007.

  • Verrecchia, R. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(1), 179–194. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2004). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 313–327. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000025080.77652.a3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A Review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 443–454. doi:10.1002/smj.4250090505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W.H. (2004). ‹A beginner’s guide to event studies’. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 22(4), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, D., & Brittain, J. (1986). Organizational Ecology: Findings and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 534–533. doi:10.2307/258308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, O.F. (2005). The UN Global Compact: The challenge and the promise. St. Augustine Papers, 6(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Dayton, Dayton, U.S.A.

    Jay J. Janney & Victor Forlani

  2. University of Texas-Dallas, Dallas, U.S.A.

    Greg Dess

Authors
  1. Jay J. Janney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greg Dess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victor Forlani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay J. Janney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janney, J.J., Dess, G. & Forlani, V. Glass Houses? Market Reactions to Firms Joining the UN Global Compact. J Bus Ethics 90, 407–423 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0052-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0052-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation